Residential Differences and Depression Among Older Adults With Dual Sensory Loss.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1001/jamaoto.2024.4488
Ethan B Wang, Emmanuel E Garcia Morales, Alden L Gross, Frank R Lin, Nicholas S Reed, Jennifer A Deal
{"title":"Residential Differences and Depression Among Older Adults With Dual Sensory Loss.","authors":"Ethan B Wang, Emmanuel E Garcia Morales, Alden L Gross, Frank R Lin, Nicholas S Reed, Jennifer A Deal","doi":"10.1001/jamaoto.2024.4488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Investigating rural-urban and regional differences in the association between dual sensory loss (concurrent hearing and vision loss) and depression may highlight gaps in sensory loss research and health care services, and by socioeconomic status. Whether urbanicity and region may modify associations between sensory loss and depression is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the rural-urban and regional differences in the association of dual sensory loss with depression among older adults.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cross-sectional study used data from wave 1 (April 2017-December 2019) of the population-based Longitudinal Aging Study in India (LASI). Participants were recruited from 35 states and union territories in India. LASI incorporated a multistage stratified area probability cluster sampling design to recruit participants 45 years and older and their spouses; 31 447 eligible participants 60 years of age or older were interviewed. Data analyses were conducted from May 17, 2022, to November 11, 2023.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Sensory loss (no sensory loss, hearing loss only, vision loss only, and dual sensory loss) was determined by respondents' self-reported perceived difficulty regarding hearing and vision function.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI-SF) scale was used to identify major episodic depression. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs of depression comparing participants with vs without sensory loss, adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates. Rural-urban and regional differences were assessed by including interaction terms between these variables and sensory loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study analysis included 27 927 participants (mean [SD] age, 68.0 [7.2] years; 14 477 [51%] females and 13 450 [49%] males). The fully adjusted models showed that the odds of depression with dual sensory loss (vs no loss) was higher in urban (OR, 3.16; 95% CI, 2.00-4.99) vs rural (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.31-2.29) residents and among residents in the West (OR, 5.10; 95% CI, 1.74-14.97) vs North (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.81-2.35) regions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>These findings indicate that sensory loss is associated with depression in older adults, with differences by urbanicity and region. Adults with sensory loss across multiple systems may be an important group to target for intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":14632,"journal":{"name":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2024.4488","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Investigating rural-urban and regional differences in the association between dual sensory loss (concurrent hearing and vision loss) and depression may highlight gaps in sensory loss research and health care services, and by socioeconomic status. Whether urbanicity and region may modify associations between sensory loss and depression is unknown.

Objective: To describe the rural-urban and regional differences in the association of dual sensory loss with depression among older adults.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study used data from wave 1 (April 2017-December 2019) of the population-based Longitudinal Aging Study in India (LASI). Participants were recruited from 35 states and union territories in India. LASI incorporated a multistage stratified area probability cluster sampling design to recruit participants 45 years and older and their spouses; 31 447 eligible participants 60 years of age or older were interviewed. Data analyses were conducted from May 17, 2022, to November 11, 2023.

Exposures: Sensory loss (no sensory loss, hearing loss only, vision loss only, and dual sensory loss) was determined by respondents' self-reported perceived difficulty regarding hearing and vision function.

Main outcomes and measures: The Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI-SF) scale was used to identify major episodic depression. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs of depression comparing participants with vs without sensory loss, adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates. Rural-urban and regional differences were assessed by including interaction terms between these variables and sensory loss.

Results: The study analysis included 27 927 participants (mean [SD] age, 68.0 [7.2] years; 14 477 [51%] females and 13 450 [49%] males). The fully adjusted models showed that the odds of depression with dual sensory loss (vs no loss) was higher in urban (OR, 3.16; 95% CI, 2.00-4.99) vs rural (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.31-2.29) residents and among residents in the West (OR, 5.10; 95% CI, 1.74-14.97) vs North (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.81-2.35) regions.

Conclusions and relevance: These findings indicate that sensory loss is associated with depression in older adults, with differences by urbanicity and region. Adults with sensory loss across multiple systems may be an important group to target for intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年双重感觉丧失患者的居住差异与抑郁。
重要性:调查双重感觉丧失(同时听力和视力丧失)与抑郁症之间关联的城乡和地区差异,可能会突出感觉丧失研究和卫生保健服务以及社会经济地位方面的差距。城市化和地域是否会改变感觉丧失和抑郁之间的联系尚不清楚。目的:探讨老年人双重感觉丧失与抑郁之间的城乡和地区差异。设计、环境和参与者:本横断面研究使用了印度基于人口的纵向老龄化研究(LASI)第一波(2017年4月- 2019年12月)的数据。参与者来自印度的35个邦和联邦属地。LASI采用多阶段分层区域概率整群抽样设计,招募45岁及以上的参与者及其配偶;31 对447名年龄在60岁及以上的合格参与者进行了访谈。数据分析时间为2022年5月17日至2023年11月11日。暴露:感觉丧失(无感觉丧失、仅听力丧失、仅视力丧失和双感觉丧失)由受访者自我报告的听力和视觉功能感知困难来确定。主要结果和测量方法:采用综合国际诊断访谈(CIDI-SF)量表来识别重度发作性抑郁症。采用Logistic回归来估计有感觉丧失与无感觉丧失的受试者抑郁的比值比(ORs)和95% ci,并对人口统计学和临床协变量进行调整。通过纳入这些变量和感觉丧失之间的相互作用项来评估城乡和区域差异。结果:研究分析纳入27名 927名参与者(平均[SD]年龄68.0[7.2]岁;14 477[51%]女性和13 450[49%]男性)。完全调整后的模型显示,在城市中,抑郁症合并双重感觉丧失(与无感觉丧失相比)的几率更高(OR, 3.16;95% CI, 2.00-4.99) vs农村(OR, 1.73;95% CI, 1.31-2.29)居民和西部居民(OR, 5.10;95% CI, 1.74-14.97) vs North (OR, 1.38;95% CI, 0.81-2.35)。结论和相关性:这些发现表明,老年人的感觉丧失与抑郁症有关,但因城市和地区而异。多系统感觉丧失的成年人可能是干预的重要目标群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
230
期刊介绍: JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery is a globally recognized and peer-reviewed medical journal dedicated to providing up-to-date information on diseases affecting the head and neck. It originated in 1925 as Archives of Otolaryngology and currently serves as the official publication for the American Head and Neck Society. As part of the prestigious JAMA Network, a collection of reputable general medical and specialty publications, it ensures the highest standards of research and expertise. Physicians and scientists worldwide rely on JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery for invaluable insights in this specialized field.
期刊最新文献
Back to the Workforce-An Important Marker of Survivorship. Concerns Regarding Mouth Closure and Airflow in Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Concerns Regarding Mouth Closure and Airflow in Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Reply. Errors in Table and Figures. Manual Therapy for Fibrosis-Related Late Effect Dysphagia in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors: The MANTLE Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1