Treatment outcomes of two surgical techniques in secondary reconstruction of unilateral cleft lip and ala nasi utilizing anthropometry assessment: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1186/s40902-024-00456-3
Ebrahim Humadi, Mawia Karkoutly, Zafin Kara Beit
{"title":"Treatment outcomes of two surgical techniques in secondary reconstruction of unilateral cleft lip and ala nasi utilizing anthropometry assessment: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Ebrahim Humadi, Mawia Karkoutly, Zafin Kara Beit","doi":"10.1186/s40902-024-00456-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An orofacial cleft significantly impacts the oral health-related quality of life of children and teenagers. Secondary reconstruction is a more complex procedure due to tissue deficiency and scarring. The study aimed to evaluate the use of Pfeifer's wave-line incision method and the rotational flap method in the secondary reconstruction of unilateral lip clefts in patients with unilateral cleft lip and ala nasi aged 5-25 years utilizing anthropometry assessment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It was a double-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled trial with two arms. Twenty-four patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1: Rotational flap method. Group 2: Control group, Pfeifer's wave-line incision method. The following anthropometric measurements were considered: Lb(X):En-En: The horizontal position of the center of the cupid's bow. Ch-Lt(l:r): The distance between the cheilion and the tip of the cupid's bow. Lt-Lb(l:r): The length of the cupid's bow. Lt(Y)(l:r): The size of the upper lip. Lt-Lt'(l:r): The height of the vermilion at the tip of the cupid's bow. Photographs were performed according to the follow-up periods: At the baseline and before surgery (t<sub>0</sub>). Immediately after surgery (t<sub>1</sub>). Two weeks after surgery (t<sub>2</sub>). Six months after surgery (t<sub>3</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rotational flap method did not outperform Pfeifer's method in the studied anthropometric measurements. In the rotational flap method group, there was a significant improvement in the mean value of Ch-Lt(l:r) from t<sub>0</sub> (1.156 ± 0.206) to t<sub>3</sub> (0.962 ± 0.098), and in the average value of Lt(Y)(l:r) from t<sub>0</sub> (0.944 ± 0.023) to t<sub>3</sub> (0.990 ± 0.011) (p < 0.05). In Pfeifer's method group, the mean value of Ch-Lt(l:r) was (1.141 ± 0.158) at t<sub>0</sub>, and then improved to become (1.007 ± 0.084) at t<sub>3</sub> (p < 0.05), the average value of Ch-Lt(l:r) at t<sub>0</sub> was (0.942 ± 0.026), which improved to (0.991 ± 0.012) at t<sub>3</sub>, and the average value of Lt-Lt'(l:r) increased from t<sub>0</sub> (1.308 ± 1.174) to t<sub>3</sub> (1.050 ± 0.054) (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pfeifer's wave-line incision and rotational flap methods achieve similar aesthetic results in the appearance of the lip or Cupid's bow after a 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN36320776, registered 06 November 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":18357,"journal":{"name":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"47 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695521/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-024-00456-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An orofacial cleft significantly impacts the oral health-related quality of life of children and teenagers. Secondary reconstruction is a more complex procedure due to tissue deficiency and scarring. The study aimed to evaluate the use of Pfeifer's wave-line incision method and the rotational flap method in the secondary reconstruction of unilateral lip clefts in patients with unilateral cleft lip and ala nasi aged 5-25 years utilizing anthropometry assessment.

Methods: It was a double-blinded, randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled trial with two arms. Twenty-four patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1: Rotational flap method. Group 2: Control group, Pfeifer's wave-line incision method. The following anthropometric measurements were considered: Lb(X):En-En: The horizontal position of the center of the cupid's bow. Ch-Lt(l:r): The distance between the cheilion and the tip of the cupid's bow. Lt-Lb(l:r): The length of the cupid's bow. Lt(Y)(l:r): The size of the upper lip. Lt-Lt'(l:r): The height of the vermilion at the tip of the cupid's bow. Photographs were performed according to the follow-up periods: At the baseline and before surgery (t0). Immediately after surgery (t1). Two weeks after surgery (t2). Six months after surgery (t3).

Results: The rotational flap method did not outperform Pfeifer's method in the studied anthropometric measurements. In the rotational flap method group, there was a significant improvement in the mean value of Ch-Lt(l:r) from t0 (1.156 ± 0.206) to t3 (0.962 ± 0.098), and in the average value of Lt(Y)(l:r) from t0 (0.944 ± 0.023) to t3 (0.990 ± 0.011) (p < 0.05). In Pfeifer's method group, the mean value of Ch-Lt(l:r) was (1.141 ± 0.158) at t0, and then improved to become (1.007 ± 0.084) at t3 (p < 0.05), the average value of Ch-Lt(l:r) at t0 was (0.942 ± 0.026), which improved to (0.991 ± 0.012) at t3, and the average value of Lt-Lt'(l:r) increased from t0 (1.308 ± 1.174) to t3 (1.050 ± 0.054) (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Pfeifer's wave-line incision and rotational flap methods achieve similar aesthetic results in the appearance of the lip or Cupid's bow after a 6-month follow-up.

Trial registration: ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN36320776, registered 06 November 2024.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用人体测量学评估单侧唇裂和鼻翼二次重建的两种手术技术的治疗效果:一项随机对照试验。
背景:口腔颌面部裂显著影响儿童和青少年口腔健康相关的生活质量。由于组织缺损和瘢痕,二次重建是一个更复杂的过程。本研究旨在利用人体测量学评估Pfeifer波浪线切口法和旋转皮瓣法在5-25岁单侧唇裂鼻翼患者的单侧唇裂二次重建中的应用。方法:双盲、随机、平行组、主动对照试验。24例患者随机分为两组。第一组:旋转皮瓣法。第二组:对照组,采用Pfeifer波浪线切口法。考虑了以下人体测量值:Lb(X):En-En:丘比特弓中心的水平位置。Ch-Lt(l:r):丘比特弓与丘比特弓尖之间的距离。Lt-Lb(l:r):丘比特弓的长度。Lt(Y)(l:r):上唇的大小。Lt-Lt'(l:r):丘比特弓尖朱红色的高度。根据随访时间进行拍照:基线时和术前(10)。术后即刻(t1)。术后2周(t2)。术后6个月(t3)。结果:旋转皮瓣法在研究的人体测量中没有优于Pfeifer法。旋转皮瓣法组,有显著改善的平均值Ch-Lt(左,右)从t0(1.156±0.206)t3(0.962±0.098),在Lt (Y)的平均值(左,右)从t0(0.944±0.023)t3(0.990±0.011)(p 0,然后改进成为(1.007±0.084)在t3 (p 0(0.942±0.026),提高在t3(0.991±0.012),和Lt-Lt的平均值(l: r)从t0(1.308±1.174)上升到t3(1.050±0.054)(p结论:Pfeifer的波浪线切口和旋转皮瓣方法在6个月的随访后,在嘴唇或丘比特弓的外观上取得了相似的美学结果。试验注册:ISRCTN注册中心,ISRCTN36320776,注册于2024年11月6日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Challenges in nasal reconstruction for facial clefts Tessier 3 bilateral and Tessier 0: a staged surgical approach case report. The three-dimensional finite element model of unilateral complete cleft lip and palate and mechanical analysis of the oral surfaces. Characteristics of masticatory behavior of patients with mandibular prognathism. Medial sural artery perforator free flap for small- to medium-sized defects in head and neck reconstruction: a suitable replacement for radial forearm free flap. The Tri-Lift suspension technique: a modified deep-plane lip lift for enhanced aesthetic outcomes-my personal approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1