Similar prognosis, different decisions: understanding parents about the possibility of termination of pregnancy due to fetal anomalies.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Women & Health Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1080/03630242.2024.2448516
Ezgi Başaran, Atakan Tanaçan, Nihat Farisoğullari, Zahid Ağaoğlu, Refaettin Şahin, Betül Akgün Aktaş, Dilek Şahin
{"title":"Similar prognosis, different decisions: understanding parents about the possibility of termination of pregnancy due to fetal anomalies.","authors":"Ezgi Başaran, Atakan Tanaçan, Nihat Farisoğullari, Zahid Ağaoğlu, Refaettin Şahin, Betül Akgün Aktaş, Dilek Şahin","doi":"10.1080/03630242.2024.2448516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we investigated the factors that influence families' decision-making processes about whether to carry a pregnancy to term or to terminate it in cases of fetal anomalies. A questionnaire was administered to 25 participants who chose to terminate their pregnancy and 25 participants who chose to carry their pregnancy to term. Among the sociodemographic characteristics investigated, only monthly income significantly differed between the groups (<i>p</i> = .044), being higher in the termination group. The participants in the non-termination group decided to proceed in a shorter time (<i>p</i> = .014). The majority of the participants in this group made this decision for religious reasons (56 percent), while in the other group, the decision was mostly based on baby-centered or parent-centered factors (48 percent and 52 percent, respectively) (<i>p</i> < .001). In the non-termination group, there was a significantly higher number of participants who expressed that their religious beliefs played an influential role in their decision (<i>p</i> = .002). In contrast, in the termination group, higher number of participants indicated that the information provided by their doctor was very effective in shaping their decisions (<i>p</i> < .001). According to the results of our study, social, cultural, and religious reasons seem to be the most important factors affecting participants' decisions related to pregnancy termination.</p>","PeriodicalId":23972,"journal":{"name":"Women & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2024.2448516","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the factors that influence families' decision-making processes about whether to carry a pregnancy to term or to terminate it in cases of fetal anomalies. A questionnaire was administered to 25 participants who chose to terminate their pregnancy and 25 participants who chose to carry their pregnancy to term. Among the sociodemographic characteristics investigated, only monthly income significantly differed between the groups (p = .044), being higher in the termination group. The participants in the non-termination group decided to proceed in a shorter time (p = .014). The majority of the participants in this group made this decision for religious reasons (56 percent), while in the other group, the decision was mostly based on baby-centered or parent-centered factors (48 percent and 52 percent, respectively) (p < .001). In the non-termination group, there was a significantly higher number of participants who expressed that their religious beliefs played an influential role in their decision (p = .002). In contrast, in the termination group, higher number of participants indicated that the information provided by their doctor was very effective in shaping their decisions (p < .001). According to the results of our study, social, cultural, and religious reasons seem to be the most important factors affecting participants' decisions related to pregnancy termination.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
相似的预后,不同的决定:了解父母因胎儿异常而终止妊娠的可能性。
在这项研究中,我们调查了在胎儿异常的情况下,影响家庭决策过程的因素,即是否将妊娠进行到足月或终止妊娠。研究人员对25名选择终止妊娠的参与者和25名选择妊娠至足月的参与者进行了问卷调查。在调查的社会人口学特征中,只有月收入在两组之间有显著差异(p = 0.044),终止组的月收入更高。非终止组的参与者决定在较短的时间内继续进行(p = .014)。这一组中的大多数参与者做出这个决定是出于宗教原因(56%),而在另一组中,这个决定主要是基于以婴儿为中心或以父母为中心的因素(分别为48%和52%)(p p = 0.002)。相反,在终止妊娠组中,更多的参与者表示医生提供的信息对他们的决定非常有效
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Women & Health
Women & Health Multiple-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Women & Health publishes original papers and critical reviews containing highly useful information for researchers, policy planners, and all providers of health care for women. These papers cover findings from studies concerning health and illness and physical and psychological well-being of women, as well as the environmental, lifestyle and sociocultural factors that are associated with health and disease, which have implications for prevention, early detection and treatment, limitation of disability and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Health experience for pregnant stay-behind women in rural India: A study on NFHS-5 survey data. National institutes of health: Analysis of gender differences in anesthesiology research funding. Prevalence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and chronic hypertension increased throughout the COVID-19 pandemic in South Carolina (2015-2021). Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Community Pharmacists in Qatar Towards Contraceptives: A Cross-Sectional Study. Factors associated with menstrual-related disturbances following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: a Spanish retrospective observational study in formerly menstruating women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1