Cesarean Delivery Upon Request in Pregnancies Following Vaginal Delivery: A Nationwide Study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Korean Medical Science Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e318
Young Mi Jung, Wonyoung Wi, Kyu-Dong Cho, Su Jung Hong, Min-Jeong Oh, Geum Joon Cho, Joong Shin Park
{"title":"Cesarean Delivery Upon Request in Pregnancies Following Vaginal Delivery: A Nationwide Study.","authors":"Young Mi Jung, Wonyoung Wi, Kyu-Dong Cho, Su Jung Hong, Min-Jeong Oh, Geum Joon Cho, Joong Shin Park","doi":"10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing rate of cesarean delivery (CD) is a significant concern in many societies worldwide. Vaginal delivery (VD) is preferred over CD for subsequent pregnancies after successful VD, for women with no specific obstetrical indications, primarily because of concerns about potential complications arising from the surgical procedure. However, the factors that influence the decision of requesting a CD have not yet been thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to examine the underlying reasons that lead mothers to choose CDs in subsequent pregnancies following a VD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included women who underwent VD in their first pregnancy between 2011 and 2020 and had a second pregnancy and childbirth within the study period. The analysis focused on women eligible for a trial of labor (TOL) in their second pregnancy, excluding those with conditions necessitating a CD. The study defined two groups: the TOL in second pregnancy (TOLS) group, consisting of women with one previous VD who attempted a VD in their subsequent pregnancy; and the CD on maternal request in second pregnancy (CDRS) group, comprising women with one past VD who opted for a CD in their second pregnancy without medical indication. The TOLS and CDRS groups were compared regarding obstetric and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 372,749 women met the inclusion criteria: 368,311 women in TOLS group and 4,438 women in CDRS group. In the regression analysis for the CDRS, several factors were identified as increasing the risk of choosing CD, including age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.07), interval between the first and second pregnancies (aOR, 1.32; 95% CI 1.29-1.35), a history of pre-existing hypertension (aOR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.17-2.65), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) during the first pregnancy (aOR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.36), hypertensive disease during pregnancy (HDP) (aOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.06-1.67), preterm labor during the first pregnancy (aOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.32-1.86), postpartum hemorrhage (aOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.21-1.47), traumatic event during delivery (aOR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.12-1.28), surgical VD (aOR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.19-1.40), and pregnancies with abortive outcomes between the first and second pregnancies (aOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.08-1.29). Additionally, women with pre-existing diabetes (aOR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.24-1.89), pre-existing hypertension (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.26-2.26), GDM (aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.11-1.37), or HDP (aOR, 2.57; 95% CI, 2.24-2.94) during the second pregnancy continued to exhibit an increased risk of opting for CD even after adjustment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CD after VD was more prevalent among women with certain demographic characteristics and obstetric histories. Investigating the factors influencing women to request CD can be helpful in making informed decisions about safe delivery methods and may also affect the CD rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":16249,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","volume":"39 50","pages":"e318"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11685277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e318","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The increasing rate of cesarean delivery (CD) is a significant concern in many societies worldwide. Vaginal delivery (VD) is preferred over CD for subsequent pregnancies after successful VD, for women with no specific obstetrical indications, primarily because of concerns about potential complications arising from the surgical procedure. However, the factors that influence the decision of requesting a CD have not yet been thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to examine the underlying reasons that lead mothers to choose CDs in subsequent pregnancies following a VD.

Methods: This retrospective study included women who underwent VD in their first pregnancy between 2011 and 2020 and had a second pregnancy and childbirth within the study period. The analysis focused on women eligible for a trial of labor (TOL) in their second pregnancy, excluding those with conditions necessitating a CD. The study defined two groups: the TOL in second pregnancy (TOLS) group, consisting of women with one previous VD who attempted a VD in their subsequent pregnancy; and the CD on maternal request in second pregnancy (CDRS) group, comprising women with one past VD who opted for a CD in their second pregnancy without medical indication. The TOLS and CDRS groups were compared regarding obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

Results: During the study period, 372,749 women met the inclusion criteria: 368,311 women in TOLS group and 4,438 women in CDRS group. In the regression analysis for the CDRS, several factors were identified as increasing the risk of choosing CD, including age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.07), interval between the first and second pregnancies (aOR, 1.32; 95% CI 1.29-1.35), a history of pre-existing hypertension (aOR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.17-2.65), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) during the first pregnancy (aOR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.36), hypertensive disease during pregnancy (HDP) (aOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.06-1.67), preterm labor during the first pregnancy (aOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.32-1.86), postpartum hemorrhage (aOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.21-1.47), traumatic event during delivery (aOR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.12-1.28), surgical VD (aOR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.19-1.40), and pregnancies with abortive outcomes between the first and second pregnancies (aOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.08-1.29). Additionally, women with pre-existing diabetes (aOR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.24-1.89), pre-existing hypertension (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.26-2.26), GDM (aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.11-1.37), or HDP (aOR, 2.57; 95% CI, 2.24-2.94) during the second pregnancy continued to exhibit an increased risk of opting for CD even after adjustment.

Conclusion: CD after VD was more prevalent among women with certain demographic characteristics and obstetric histories. Investigating the factors influencing women to request CD can be helpful in making informed decisions about safe delivery methods and may also affect the CD rate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阴道分娩后妊娠要求剖宫产:一项全国性研究。
背景:剖宫产率的上升是全世界许多社会关注的一个重要问题。对于没有特定产科指征的妇女,阴道分娩(VD)比CD更适合于VD成功后的后续妊娠,主要是因为担心手术过程中可能出现的并发症。但是,尚未对影响是否要求提供光盘的决定的因素进行彻底调查。本研究旨在探讨导致母亲在患VD后的妊娠中选择cd的潜在原因。方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了2011年至2020年间首次怀孕并在研究期间第二次怀孕和分娩的女性。分析的重点是有资格在第二次怀孕时进行分娩试验(TOL)的妇女,不包括那些需要CD的妇女。研究定义了两组:第二次怀孕时的TOL组,由先前患有VD的妇女组成,她们在随后的怀孕中尝试过VD;第二次妊娠中母亲要求的乳糜泻组(CDRS),包括有过一次VD的妇女,在没有医学指征的情况下在第二次妊娠中选择了乳糜泻。比较TOLS组和CDRS组的产科和新生儿结局。结果:在研究期间,372,749例妇女符合纳入标准:TOLS组368,311例,CDRS组4,438例。在CDRS的回归分析中,几个因素被确定为增加选择CD的风险,包括年龄(调整后的优势比[aOR], 1.06;95%可信区间[CI], 1.05-1.07),第一次和第二次怀孕之间的间隔(aOR, 1.32;95% CI 1.29-1.35),既往高血压史(aOR, 1.76;95% CI, 1.17-2.65),妊娠期糖尿病(GDM) (aOR, 1.19;95% CI, 1.05-1.36),妊娠期高血压疾病(HDP) (aOR, 1.33;95% CI, 1.06-1.67),首次妊娠早产(aOR, 1.57;95% CI, 1.32-1.86),产后出血(aOR, 1.33;95% CI, 1.21-1.47),分娩时创伤性事件(aOR, 1.19;95% CI, 1.12-1.28),手术VD (aOR, 1.29;95% CI, 1.19-1.40),以及第一次和第二次妊娠之间有流产结局的妊娠(aOR, 1.18;95% ci, 1.08-1.29)。此外,已有糖尿病的女性(aOR, 1.53;95% CI, 1.24-1.89),既往高血压(aOR, 1.69;95% CI, 1.26-2.26), GDM (aOR, 1.23;95% CI, 1.11-1.37)或HDP (aOR, 2.57;95% CI, 2.24-2.94)在第二次怀孕期间,即使在调整后,选择CD的风险仍然增加。结论:VD后CD在具有一定人口统计学特征和产科史的女性中更为普遍。调查影响妇女要求乳糜泻的因素有助于对安全分娩方法作出明智的决定,也可能影响乳糜泻率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Journal of Korean Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Medical Science (JKMS) is an international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal of medicine published weekly in English. The Journal’s publisher is the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMS), Korean Medical Association (KMA). JKMS aims to publish evidence-based, scientific research articles from various disciplines of the medical sciences. The Journal welcomes articles of general interest to medical researchers especially when they contain original information. Articles on the clinical evaluation of drugs and other therapies, epidemiologic studies of the general population, studies on pathogenic organisms and toxic materials, and the toxicities and adverse effects of therapeutics are welcome.
期刊最新文献
A Longitudinal Increase in Serum Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase Levels, but Not in Alanine Aminotransferase Levels, Improves the Prediction of Risk of Impaired Fasting Glucose in Male. Cost Utility Analysis of National Cancer Screening Program for Gastric Cancer in Korea: A Markov Model Analysis. Identification of Mutations of the RYR2 in Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. Physicians' Collective Actions in Response to Government Health Policies: A Scoping Review. In This Issue on 17-February-2025.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1