Interlaboratory assays from the fungal PCR Initiative and the Modimucor Study Group to improve qPCR detection of Mucorales DNA in serum: one more step toward standardization.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Journal of Clinical Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-02-19 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1128/jcm.01525-24
Steffi Rocchi, Emeline Scherer, P Lewis White, Audrey Guitton, Alexandre Alanio, Françoise Botterel, Marie Elisabeth Bougnoux, Maria José Buitrago, Massimo Cogliati, Marjorie Cornu, Celine Damiani, Julie Denis, Damien Dupont, Stefan Fuchs, Rebecca Gorton, Pieter-Jan Haas, Ferry Hagen, Rasmus Hare, Xavier Iriart, Corné H W Klaassen, Michaela Lackner, Martina Lengerova, Willem J G Melchers, Florent Morio, Philippe Poirier, Jan Springer, Stephane Valot, Birgit Willinger, Cristina Mazzi, Mario Cruciani, Rosemary Barnes, J Peter Donnelly, Jürgen Loeffler, Laurence Millon
{"title":"Interlaboratory assays from the fungal PCR Initiative and the Modimucor Study Group to improve qPCR detection of Mucorales DNA in serum: one more step toward standardization.","authors":"Steffi Rocchi, Emeline Scherer, P Lewis White, Audrey Guitton, Alexandre Alanio, Françoise Botterel, Marie Elisabeth Bougnoux, Maria José Buitrago, Massimo Cogliati, Marjorie Cornu, Celine Damiani, Julie Denis, Damien Dupont, Stefan Fuchs, Rebecca Gorton, Pieter-Jan Haas, Ferry Hagen, Rasmus Hare, Xavier Iriart, Corné H W Klaassen, Michaela Lackner, Martina Lengerova, Willem J G Melchers, Florent Morio, Philippe Poirier, Jan Springer, Stephane Valot, Birgit Willinger, Cristina Mazzi, Mario Cruciani, Rosemary Barnes, J Peter Donnelly, Jürgen Loeffler, Laurence Millon","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01525-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to identify parameters influencing DNA extraction and PCR amplification efficiencies in an attempt to standardize Mucorales qPCR. The Fungal PCR Initiative Mucorales Laboratory Working Group distributed two panels of simulated samples to 26 laboratories: Panel A (six sera spiked with Mucorales DNA and one negative control serum) and Panel B (six Mucorales DNA extracts). Panel A underwent DNA extraction in each laboratory according to the local procedure and were sent to a central laboratory for testing using three different qPCR techniques: one in-house qPCR assay and two commercial assays (MucorGenius and Fungiplex). Panel B DNA extracts were PCR amplified in each laboratory using local procedures: nine in-house qPCR assays and two commercial kits (MucorGenius and MycoGENIE). All data were compiled and anonymously analyzed at the central laboratory. For Panel A, a total of six different automated platforms and five manual extraction methods were used. Positive rates were 64%, 70%, and 89%, for the MucorGenius, Fungiplex, and the in-house qPCR assay, respectively. Using a large volume of serum for DNA extraction provided the highest analytical sensitivity (82.5% for 1 mL compared with 62.7% for smaller volumes, <i>P</i> < 0.01). For Panel B, five in-house qPCR assays and two commercial kits had >78% positivity. Using larger PCR input volumes (≥7 µL) was associated with the highest sensitivity at 95.5% compared to 58.3% when lower input volumes were used (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Using larger sample volumes for nucleic acid extraction and DNA template volumes for PCR amplification significantly improves the performance of Mucorales qPCR when testing serum.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Mucormycosis is a life-threatening mold infection affecting immunosuppressed patients but also other patients with diabetes or trauma. Better survival is linked to shorter delays in diagnosis and treatment initiation. Detection of Mucorales-free DNA in serum or plasma using quantitative PCR allows a prompt diagnosis and earlier treatment. Several techniques and protocols of quantitative Mucorales PCR are used in Europe, and improving performance remains a common objective of laboratories participating in the fungal PCR Initiative Working Group. This study, which combined results from 26 laboratories in Europe, showed that the main parameters underpinning sensitivity are the preanalytical variables (volume of serum used for DNA extraction and DNA template volume), irrespective of the extraction platforms and qPCR assay/platform.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0152524"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837492/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01525-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify parameters influencing DNA extraction and PCR amplification efficiencies in an attempt to standardize Mucorales qPCR. The Fungal PCR Initiative Mucorales Laboratory Working Group distributed two panels of simulated samples to 26 laboratories: Panel A (six sera spiked with Mucorales DNA and one negative control serum) and Panel B (six Mucorales DNA extracts). Panel A underwent DNA extraction in each laboratory according to the local procedure and were sent to a central laboratory for testing using three different qPCR techniques: one in-house qPCR assay and two commercial assays (MucorGenius and Fungiplex). Panel B DNA extracts were PCR amplified in each laboratory using local procedures: nine in-house qPCR assays and two commercial kits (MucorGenius and MycoGENIE). All data were compiled and anonymously analyzed at the central laboratory. For Panel A, a total of six different automated platforms and five manual extraction methods were used. Positive rates were 64%, 70%, and 89%, for the MucorGenius, Fungiplex, and the in-house qPCR assay, respectively. Using a large volume of serum for DNA extraction provided the highest analytical sensitivity (82.5% for 1 mL compared with 62.7% for smaller volumes, P < 0.01). For Panel B, five in-house qPCR assays and two commercial kits had >78% positivity. Using larger PCR input volumes (≥7 µL) was associated with the highest sensitivity at 95.5% compared to 58.3% when lower input volumes were used (P < 0.01). Using larger sample volumes for nucleic acid extraction and DNA template volumes for PCR amplification significantly improves the performance of Mucorales qPCR when testing serum.

Importance: Mucormycosis is a life-threatening mold infection affecting immunosuppressed patients but also other patients with diabetes or trauma. Better survival is linked to shorter delays in diagnosis and treatment initiation. Detection of Mucorales-free DNA in serum or plasma using quantitative PCR allows a prompt diagnosis and earlier treatment. Several techniques and protocols of quantitative Mucorales PCR are used in Europe, and improving performance remains a common objective of laboratories participating in the fungal PCR Initiative Working Group. This study, which combined results from 26 laboratories in Europe, showed that the main parameters underpinning sensitivity are the preanalytical variables (volume of serum used for DNA extraction and DNA template volume), irrespective of the extraction platforms and qPCR assay/platform.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自真菌PCR倡议和Modimucor研究组的实验室间分析,以改进血清中Mucorales DNA的qPCR检测:朝着标准化又迈出了一步。
本研究的目的是确定影响DNA提取和PCR扩增效率的参数,试图标准化Mucorales qPCR。真菌PCR倡议Mucorales实验室工作组向26个实验室分发了两组模拟样本:A组(六份含有Mucorales DNA的血清和一份阴性对照血清)和B组(六份Mucorales DNA提取物)。A组在每个实验室根据当地程序进行DNA提取,并被送到中心实验室使用三种不同的qPCR技术进行检测:一种内部qPCR检测和两种商业检测(MucorGenius和Fungiplex)。每个实验室使用本地程序对B组DNA提取物进行PCR扩增:9个内部qPCR检测和2个商业试剂盒(MucorGenius和MycoGENIE)。所有数据均在中心实验室进行匿名汇编和分析。对于A组,总共使用了6种不同的自动化平台和5种人工提取方法。MucorGenius、Fungiplex和内部qPCR检测的阳性率分别为64%、70%和89%。使用大体积的血清提取DNA具有最高的分析灵敏度(1ml为82.5%,小体积为62.7%,P < 0.01)。对于B组,5个内部qPCR检测和2个商业试剂盒的阳性率为0.78%。使用较大的PCR输入量(≥7µL)与最高的灵敏度相关,为95.5%,而使用较小的输入量时为58.3% (P < 0.01)。使用更大的样品体积进行核酸提取和DNA模板体积进行PCR扩增,显著提高了Mucorales qPCR检测血清的性能。重要性:毛霉病是一种危及生命的霉菌感染,影响免疫抑制患者,但也影响其他糖尿病或创伤患者。较好的生存率与较短的诊断和开始治疗延误有关。使用定量PCR检测血清或血浆中无粘膜菌的DNA可以及时诊断和早期治疗。欧洲使用了几种定量Mucorales PCR的技术和方案,提高性能仍然是参与真菌PCR倡议工作组的实验室的共同目标。这项研究结合了欧洲26个实验室的结果,表明支持灵敏度的主要参数是分析前变量(用于DNA提取的血清体积和DNA模板体积),而与提取平台和qPCR检测/平台无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
347
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
Nanopore sequencing for precise detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and drug resistance: a retrospective multicenter study in China. External quality assessment of molecular detection and variant typing of SARS-CoV-2 in European expert laboratories in 2023. Lipid fingerprinting by MALDI Biotyper Sirius instrument fails to differentiate the three subspecies of the Mycobacterium abscessus complex. The impact of FDA-cleared molecular solutions for BK polyomavirus quantitation. A rapid and simple MALDI-TOF MS lipid profiling method for differentiating Mycobacterium ulcerans from Mycobacterium marinum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1