In Situ Detection of Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 and Programmed Death Ligand 1 Interactions as a Functional Predictor for Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in NSCLC
Amanda Lindberg MSc , Lars Muhl PhD , Hui Yu MSc , Louise Hellberg BSc , Rebecca Artursson MSc , Jakob Friedrich MD , Max Backman MD, PhD , Neda Hekmati MSc , Johanna Mattsson PhD , Cecilia Lindskog PhD , Hans Brunnström MD, PhD , Johan Botling MD, PhD , Artur Mezheyeuski MD, PhD , Erika Broström MD , Miklos Gulyas MD, PhD , Klas Kärre MD, PhD , Johan Isaksson MD, PhD , Patrick Micke MD, PhD , Carina Strell PhD
{"title":"In Situ Detection of Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 and Programmed Death Ligand 1 Interactions as a Functional Predictor for Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in NSCLC","authors":"Amanda Lindberg MSc , Lars Muhl PhD , Hui Yu MSc , Louise Hellberg BSc , Rebecca Artursson MSc , Jakob Friedrich MD , Max Backman MD, PhD , Neda Hekmati MSc , Johanna Mattsson PhD , Cecilia Lindskog PhD , Hans Brunnström MD, PhD , Johan Botling MD, PhD , Artur Mezheyeuski MD, PhD , Erika Broström MD , Miklos Gulyas MD, PhD , Klas Kärre MD, PhD , Johan Isaksson MD, PhD , Patrick Micke MD, PhD , Carina Strell PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtho.2024.12.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed lung cancer treatment, yet their effectiveness seem restricted to certain patient subsets. Current clinical stratification on the basis of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression offers limited predictive value. Given the mechanism of action, directly detecting spatial programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1)–PD-L1 interactions might yield more precise insights into immune responses and treatment outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We applied a second-generation in situ proximity ligation assay to detect PD1–PD-L1 interactions in diagnostic tissue samples from 16 different cancer types, a tissue microarray with surgically resected early-stage NSCLC, and finally diagnostic biopsies from 140 patients with advanced NSCLC with and without ICI treatment. RNA sequencing analysis was used to identify potential resistance mechanisms.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the early-stage NSCLC, only approximately half of the cases with detectable PD-L1 and PD1 expression exhibited PD1–PD-L1 interactions, with significantly lower levels in EGFR-mutated tumors. Interaction levels varied across cancer types, aligning with reported ICI response rates. In ICI-treated patients with NSCLC, higher PD1–PD-L1 interactions were linked to complete responses and longer survival, outperforming standard PD-L1 expression assays. Patients who did not respond to ICIs despite high PD1–PD-L1 interactions exhibited additional expression of stromal immune mediators (<em>EOMES, HAVCR1</em>/TIM-1, <em>JAML, FCRL1</em>).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study proposes a diagnostic shift from static biomarker quantification to assessing active immune pathways, providing more precise ICI treatment. This functional concept applies to tiny lung biopsies and can be extended to further immune checkpoints. Accordingly, our results indicate concerted ICI resistance mechanisms, highlighting the need for combination diagnostics and therapies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17515,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic Oncology","volume":"20 5","pages":"Pages 625-640"},"PeriodicalIF":20.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556086424025474","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed lung cancer treatment, yet their effectiveness seem restricted to certain patient subsets. Current clinical stratification on the basis of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression offers limited predictive value. Given the mechanism of action, directly detecting spatial programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1)–PD-L1 interactions might yield more precise insights into immune responses and treatment outcomes.
Methods
We applied a second-generation in situ proximity ligation assay to detect PD1–PD-L1 interactions in diagnostic tissue samples from 16 different cancer types, a tissue microarray with surgically resected early-stage NSCLC, and finally diagnostic biopsies from 140 patients with advanced NSCLC with and without ICI treatment. RNA sequencing analysis was used to identify potential resistance mechanisms.
Results
In the early-stage NSCLC, only approximately half of the cases with detectable PD-L1 and PD1 expression exhibited PD1–PD-L1 interactions, with significantly lower levels in EGFR-mutated tumors. Interaction levels varied across cancer types, aligning with reported ICI response rates. In ICI-treated patients with NSCLC, higher PD1–PD-L1 interactions were linked to complete responses and longer survival, outperforming standard PD-L1 expression assays. Patients who did not respond to ICIs despite high PD1–PD-L1 interactions exhibited additional expression of stromal immune mediators (EOMES, HAVCR1/TIM-1, JAML, FCRL1).
Conclusion
Our study proposes a diagnostic shift from static biomarker quantification to assessing active immune pathways, providing more precise ICI treatment. This functional concept applies to tiny lung biopsies and can be extended to further immune checkpoints. Accordingly, our results indicate concerted ICI resistance mechanisms, highlighting the need for combination diagnostics and therapies.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Thoracic Oncology (JTO), the official journal of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer,is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to the prevention, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of all thoracic malignancies.The readship includes epidemiologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, thoracic surgeons, pulmonologists, radiologists, pathologists, nuclear medicine physicians, and research scientists with a special interest in thoracic oncology.