Remote ischemic preconditioning on perioperative autonomic nervous system function and postoperative recovery in patients undergoing cholecystectomy.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00365521.2024.2440801
Siyu Chen, Yuwei Ma, Yue Liu, Jianrong Ye, Yutong Li, Yubao Ma, Yumiti Aili, Yan Ma
{"title":"Remote ischemic preconditioning on perioperative autonomic nervous system function and postoperative recovery in patients undergoing cholecystectomy.","authors":"Siyu Chen, Yuwei Ma, Yue Liu, Jianrong Ye, Yutong Li, Yubao Ma, Yumiti Aili, Yan Ma","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2024.2440801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cholecystectomy often disrupts autonomic balance, impacting recovery. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) may enhance ANS function and protect organs, but its role in cholecystectomy is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial, 80 patients aged 45 to 65 years, scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, were randomly assigned to either the RIPC group or the control group. The primary outcomes were mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate variability (HRV), and the low-frequency to high-frequency ratio (LF/HF) measured at various time points during the perioperative period. Secondary outcomes included liver and kidney function markers, postoperative hospital stay, and 30-day mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RIPC group significantly improved HRV compared to the control group at 5 minutes post-anesthesia induction (42.5 ± 9.8 ms vs. 36.4 ± 10.1 ms, <i>P</i> = 0.02) and at the end of surgery (44.8 ± 10.5 ms vs. 37.1 ± 9.3 ms, <i>P</i> = 0.01). The LF/HF ratio was significantly lower in the RIPC group at 30 minutes into surgery (1.25 ± 0.35 vs. 1.67 ± 0.42, <i>P</i> = 0.04) and at the end of surgery (1.19 ± 0.31 vs. 1.71 ± 0.39, <i>P</i> = 0.03), indicating improved autonomic balance. There were no significant differences in MAP, liver function markers (ALT), or kidney function (SCr) between groups at any time point.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RIPC may improve ANS function and MAP stability during cholecystectomy, as shown by better HRV and lower LF/HF ratios. Though the impact on recovery was not significant.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2440801","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cholecystectomy often disrupts autonomic balance, impacting recovery. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) may enhance ANS function and protect organs, but its role in cholecystectomy is unclear.

Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 80 patients aged 45 to 65 years, scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, were randomly assigned to either the RIPC group or the control group. The primary outcomes were mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate variability (HRV), and the low-frequency to high-frequency ratio (LF/HF) measured at various time points during the perioperative period. Secondary outcomes included liver and kidney function markers, postoperative hospital stay, and 30-day mortality rates.

Results: RIPC group significantly improved HRV compared to the control group at 5 minutes post-anesthesia induction (42.5 ± 9.8 ms vs. 36.4 ± 10.1 ms, P = 0.02) and at the end of surgery (44.8 ± 10.5 ms vs. 37.1 ± 9.3 ms, P = 0.01). The LF/HF ratio was significantly lower in the RIPC group at 30 minutes into surgery (1.25 ± 0.35 vs. 1.67 ± 0.42, P = 0.04) and at the end of surgery (1.19 ± 0.31 vs. 1.71 ± 0.39, P = 0.03), indicating improved autonomic balance. There were no significant differences in MAP, liver function markers (ALT), or kidney function (SCr) between groups at any time point.

Conclusions: RIPC may improve ANS function and MAP stability during cholecystectomy, as shown by better HRV and lower LF/HF ratios. Though the impact on recovery was not significant.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程缺血预处理对胆囊切除术患者围手术期自主神经系统功能及术后恢复的影响。
背景:胆囊切除术常破坏自主神经平衡,影响康复。远端缺血预处理(RIPC)可能增强ANS功能和保护器官,但其在胆囊切除术中的作用尚不清楚。方法:在这项随机对照试验中,80例年龄在45 ~ 65岁之间,计划择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者被随机分为RIPC组和对照组。主要结局是围手术期各时间点的平均动脉压(MAP)、心率变异性(HRV)和低频高频比(LF/HF)。次要结局包括肝肾功能指标、术后住院时间和30天死亡率。结果:RIPC组在麻醉诱导后5 min(42.5±9.8 ms比36.4±10.1 ms, P = 0.02)和手术结束时(44.8±10.5 ms比37.1±9.3 ms, P = 0.01) HRV较对照组显著改善。RIPC组的LF/HF比值在手术30分钟(1.25±0.35∶1.67±0.42,P = 0.04)和手术结束时(1.19±0.31∶1.71±0.39,P = 0.03)明显降低,表明自主神经平衡得到改善。各组在任何时间点的MAP、肝功能标志物(ALT)、肾功能(SCr)均无显著差异。结论:RIPC可通过改善HRV和降低LF/HF比值,改善胆囊切除术时ANS功能和MAP稳定性。虽然对经济复苏的影响并不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
期刊最新文献
Specialty laboratory testing for chronic abdominal pain in irritable bowel syndrome. Health-related quality of life at diagnosis and follow-up in Faroese and Danish patients with inflammatory bowel disease - a Faroese IBD cohort study. LncRNA MIR17HG drives cisplatin resistance partially via miR-138-5p/AKAP9 axis in cholangiocarcinoma. The impact of the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index as a prognostic factor in patients with early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Efficacy and safety of anticoagulation in asymptomatic cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1