Chemotherapy plus immunotherapy as first line combination in older patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Seminars in oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.11.001
Valentina Bertaglia, Fausto Petrelli, Lorenzo Dottorini, Simona Carnio, Anna Maria Morelli, Alessandro Nepote, Antonio Maccioni, Mario Scartozzi, Cinzia Solinas, Silvia Novello
{"title":"Chemotherapy plus immunotherapy as first line combination in older patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Valentina Bertaglia, Fausto Petrelli, Lorenzo Dottorini, Simona Carnio, Anna Maria Morelli, Alessandro Nepote, Antonio Maccioni, Mario Scartozzi, Cinzia Solinas, Silvia Novello","doi":"10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 10%-15% of all lung cancers. At diagnosis, nearly two thirds of patients with SCLC have extensive stage (ES), with a median overall survival (OS) less than 12 months. The combination of protein-death-1/protein-death-ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with first-line platinum plus etoposide chemotherapy has changed the therapeutic landscape for ES-SCLC. Older adults represent most of the cancers diagnosed and deaths by age group, with an expected increase over the next decade. In the real-world setting, about 30%-40% of patients with a diagnosis of SCLC are reported to be over 70-years-old at the time of diagnosis. However, this subgroup of patients is underrepresented in clinical trials. Based on this evidence, we performed this systematic review to define the activity of ICIs plus chemotherapy in older patients with previously untreated ES-SCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was carried out in accordance with the statement in the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A systematic search on multiple electronic databases was conducted from inception to the end of April to identify randomized trials that prospectively evaluated chemotherapy ± PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs. When more than one report of the same study was available, the most recent data (with longer follow-up and/or higher number of patients) was considered. The primary endpoint of the study was efficacy, in terms of overall survival, progression-free survival, and disease control rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We selected six randomized clinical trials that enrolled 3396 patients in the meta-analysis. In the experimental arm, 670 patients were 65 years of age and older compared to 504 in the control arm. In the subgroup of patients ≥65 years, adding ICIs to chemotherapy led to a significant benefit in OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.90). There was moderate but not-significant heterogenity among the trials (I<sup>2</sup> = 47%, P = 0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review found that the combination of chemotherapy plus ICIs improved OS among older patients with ES-SCLC. Biomarker and comprehensive geriatric assessment are needed to improve the identification and selection of patients with cancer that are uniformly defined as older.</p>","PeriodicalId":21750,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.11.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 10%-15% of all lung cancers. At diagnosis, nearly two thirds of patients with SCLC have extensive stage (ES), with a median overall survival (OS) less than 12 months. The combination of protein-death-1/protein-death-ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with first-line platinum plus etoposide chemotherapy has changed the therapeutic landscape for ES-SCLC. Older adults represent most of the cancers diagnosed and deaths by age group, with an expected increase over the next decade. In the real-world setting, about 30%-40% of patients with a diagnosis of SCLC are reported to be over 70-years-old at the time of diagnosis. However, this subgroup of patients is underrepresented in clinical trials. Based on this evidence, we performed this systematic review to define the activity of ICIs plus chemotherapy in older patients with previously untreated ES-SCLC.

Methods: This systematic review was carried out in accordance with the statement in the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A systematic search on multiple electronic databases was conducted from inception to the end of April to identify randomized trials that prospectively evaluated chemotherapy ± PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs. When more than one report of the same study was available, the most recent data (with longer follow-up and/or higher number of patients) was considered. The primary endpoint of the study was efficacy, in terms of overall survival, progression-free survival, and disease control rate.

Results: We selected six randomized clinical trials that enrolled 3396 patients in the meta-analysis. In the experimental arm, 670 patients were 65 years of age and older compared to 504 in the control arm. In the subgroup of patients ≥65 years, adding ICIs to chemotherapy led to a significant benefit in OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.90). There was moderate but not-significant heterogenity among the trials (I2 = 47%, P = 0.07).

Conclusion: This systematic review found that the combination of chemotherapy plus ICIs improved OS among older patients with ES-SCLC. Biomarker and comprehensive geriatric assessment are needed to improve the identification and selection of patients with cancer that are uniformly defined as older.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化疗加免疫治疗作为广泛期小细胞肺癌老年患者的一线治疗方案:系统综述与荟萃分析。
背景:小细胞肺癌(SCLC)占所有肺癌的10%-15%。在诊断时,近三分之二的SCLC患者具有广泛分期(ES),中位总生存期(OS)小于12个月。蛋白-死亡-1/蛋白-死亡-配体-1 (PD-1/PD-L1)免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)联合一线铂+依托泊苷化疗改变了ES-SCLC的治疗前景。按年龄组划分的癌症确诊和死亡病例中,老年人占大多数,预计今后十年这一数字还会增加。在现实环境中,约30%-40%被诊断为SCLC的患者在诊断时年龄超过70岁。然而,这一亚组患者在临床试验中代表性不足。基于这一证据,我们进行了这项系统综述,以确定先前未经治疗的老年ES-SCLC患者的ICIs加化疗的活性。方法:本系统评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南中的声明进行。从开始到4月底,对多个电子数据库进行了系统检索,以确定前瞻性评价化疗±PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs的随机试验。当同一研究的多个报告可用时,考虑最新的数据(随访时间较长和/或患者人数较多)。该研究的主要终点是疗效,即总生存期、无进展生存期和疾病控制率。结果:我们在meta分析中选择了6项随机临床试验,共纳入3396例患者。在实验组中,670名患者年龄在65岁及以上,而对照组为504名。在≥65岁的患者亚组中,在化疗中加入ICIs可显著改善OS[风险比(HR) 0.80, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.72-0.90]。试验间存在中度但不显著的异质性(I2 = 47%,P = 0.07)。结论:本系统综述发现化疗联合ICIs可改善老年ES-SCLC患者的OS。需要生物标志物和全面的老年评估来改进对被统一定义为老年的癌症患者的识别和选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in oncology
Seminars in oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
104 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology brings you current, authoritative, and practical reviews of developments in the etiology, diagnosis and management of cancer. Each issue examines topics of clinical importance, with an emphasis on providing both the basic knowledge needed to better understand a topic as well as evidence-based opinions from leaders in the field. Seminars in Oncology also seeks to be a venue for sharing a diversity of opinions including those that might be considered "outside the box". We welcome a healthy and respectful exchange of opinions and urge you to approach us with your insights as well as suggestions of topics that you deem worthy of coverage. By helping the reader understand the basic biology and the therapy of cancer as they learn the nuances from experts, all in a journal that encourages the exchange of ideas we aim to help move the treatment of cancer forward.
期刊最新文献
The likelihood of being helped or harmed obtained from clinical trial results for cancer therapy: Can it really help? Chemotherapy plus immunotherapy as first line combination in older patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gender-Based Differences in the Efficacy of Anti-EGFR/BRAF/MEK Targeted Therapy in Patients with BRAF-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Outside front cover Masthead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1