Cerebral Microbleeds and Their Association With Inflammation and Blood-Brain Barrier Leakage in Small Vessel Disease.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Stroke Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048974
Lupei Cai, Daniel J Tozer, Hugh S Markus
{"title":"Cerebral Microbleeds and Their Association With Inflammation and Blood-Brain Barrier Leakage in Small Vessel Disease.","authors":"Lupei Cai, Daniel J Tozer, Hugh S Markus","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>How cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are formed, and how they cause tissue damage is not fully understood, but it has been suggested they are associated with inflammation, and they could also be related to increased blood-brain barrier (BBB) leakage. We investigated the relationship of CMBs with inflammation and BBB leakage in cerebral small vessel disease, and in particular, whether these 2 processes were increased in the vicinity of CMBs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 54 patients with sporadic cerebral small vessel disease presenting with lacunar stroke, we simultaneously assessed microglial activation using the positron emission tomography ligand [11C]PK11195 and BBB leakage using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, on a positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging system. To assess local inflammation and BBB leakage, 3 one-voxel concentric shells were generated around each CMB on susceptibility-weighted imaging and resampled to positron emission tomography and T1 mapping images, respectively. In these 3 shells, we calculated the mean of PK11195 nondisplaceable binding potential (BPND) as a marker of microglial activation, as well as the mean influx rate as a marker of BBB leakage. In addition, 93 blood biomarkers related to cardiovascular disease, inflammation, and endothelial activation were measured to quantify systemic inflammation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant associations were found between the number of CMBs and the measures for microglial activation (<i>β</i>=2.6×10<sup>-5</sup>, <i>P</i>=0.050) and BBB leakage (<i>β</i>=-0.0001, <i>P</i>=0.400) in the white matter. There was no difference in measures of microglial activation (<i>P</i>=0.403) or BBB leakage (<i>P</i>=0.423) across the 3 shells surrounding the CMBs. Furthermore, after correcting for multiple comparisons, no associations were observed between systemic inflammation biomarkers and the number of CMBs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no evidence that CMBs are associated with either microglial activation assessed by [11]CPK11195 positron emission tomography or BBB leakage assessed by dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, either globally or locally, in sporadic cerebral small vessel disease. There was also no association with markers of systemic inflammation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"427-436"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048974","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: How cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are formed, and how they cause tissue damage is not fully understood, but it has been suggested they are associated with inflammation, and they could also be related to increased blood-brain barrier (BBB) leakage. We investigated the relationship of CMBs with inflammation and BBB leakage in cerebral small vessel disease, and in particular, whether these 2 processes were increased in the vicinity of CMBs.

Methods: In 54 patients with sporadic cerebral small vessel disease presenting with lacunar stroke, we simultaneously assessed microglial activation using the positron emission tomography ligand [11C]PK11195 and BBB leakage using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, on a positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging system. To assess local inflammation and BBB leakage, 3 one-voxel concentric shells were generated around each CMB on susceptibility-weighted imaging and resampled to positron emission tomography and T1 mapping images, respectively. In these 3 shells, we calculated the mean of PK11195 nondisplaceable binding potential (BPND) as a marker of microglial activation, as well as the mean influx rate as a marker of BBB leakage. In addition, 93 blood biomarkers related to cardiovascular disease, inflammation, and endothelial activation were measured to quantify systemic inflammation.

Results: No significant associations were found between the number of CMBs and the measures for microglial activation (β=2.6×10-5, P=0.050) and BBB leakage (β=-0.0001, P=0.400) in the white matter. There was no difference in measures of microglial activation (P=0.403) or BBB leakage (P=0.423) across the 3 shells surrounding the CMBs. Furthermore, after correcting for multiple comparisons, no associations were observed between systemic inflammation biomarkers and the number of CMBs.

Conclusions: We found no evidence that CMBs are associated with either microglial activation assessed by [11]CPK11195 positron emission tomography or BBB leakage assessed by dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, either globally or locally, in sporadic cerebral small vessel disease. There was also no association with markers of systemic inflammation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑血管疾病的脑微出血及其与炎症和血脑屏障渗漏的关系
背景:脑微出血(CMBs)是如何形成的,以及它们是如何引起组织损伤的尚不完全清楚,但已有研究表明它们与炎症有关,也可能与血脑屏障(BBB)渗漏增加有关。我们研究了CMBs与脑血管病炎症和血脑屏障渗漏的关系,特别是这两个过程是否在CMBs附近增加。方法:在54例以腔隙性卒中为表现的散发性脑血管疾病患者中,我们在正电子发射断层扫描配体[11C]PK11195上同时评估了小胶质细胞的激活,并在正电子发射断层扫描-磁共振成像系统上使用动态对比增强磁共振成像评估了血脑屏障泄漏。为了评估局部炎症和血脑屏障渗漏,在敏感性加权成像上在每个CMB周围生成3个一体素同心壳,并分别重新采样到正电子发射断层扫描和T1映射图像上。在这3个壳中,我们计算了PK11195不可置换结合电位(BPND)的平均值,作为小胶质细胞激活的标志,以及平均内流率,作为血脑屏障渗漏的标志。此外,研究人员还测量了93种与心血管疾病、炎症和内皮细胞活化相关的血液生物标志物,以量化全身炎症。结果:CMBs数量与脑白质小胶质细胞活化(β=2.6×10-5, P=0.050)和血脑屏障渗漏(β=-0.0001, P=0.400)无显著相关性。小胶质细胞激活(P=0.403)或血脑屏障泄漏(P=0.423)在CMBs周围的3个外壳上没有差异。此外,在校正多重比较后,未观察到全身炎症生物标志物与CMBs数量之间的关联。结论:我们没有发现证据表明,在散发性脑血管病中,CMBs与[11]CPK11195正电子发射断层扫描评估的小胶质细胞激活或动态对比增强磁共振成像评估的BBB泄漏有关,无论是整体还是局部。也与全身性炎症标志物无关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
期刊最新文献
Strategies to Advance Stroke Care in Women: An International Conversation. Sex Differences in Prescription Patterns and Medication Adherence to Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Among Patients With Ischemic Stroke. Preparing for (and Making the Most of) Your Next Scientific Conference. Immunothrombosis in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Sex Differences in the Pre- and In-Hospital Setting of Patients With Stroke Are Driven by Higher Age and Stroke Severity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1