Differences in metabolite genotoxicity test results of rat liver S9 microsomes treated with various microsomal enzyme inducers.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1080/15376516.2024.2443543
Shigeru Igaki, Kiyohiro Hashimoto, Toshikatsu Matsui, Tadahiro Shinozawa
{"title":"Differences in metabolite genotoxicity test results of rat liver S9 microsomes treated with various microsomal enzyme inducers.","authors":"Shigeru Igaki, Kiyohiro Hashimoto, Toshikatsu Matsui, Tadahiro Shinozawa","doi":"10.1080/15376516.2024.2443543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rat S9 microsome fraction is commonly used to assess compound metabolite formation during <i>in vitro</i> genotoxicity assessments. However, methods using S9 have not been standardized for genotoxicity studies, and different experimental methods are used at various facilities. Therefore, this study investigated whether the differences between the two experimental conditions (1) S9 inducers, phenobarbital + beta-naphthoflavones vs. Aroclor 1254 and (2) the plate incubation vs. preincubation method) in the micro-Ames test would affect the results. Nitrosamine and in-house genotoxicity-positive compounds were used with benzopyrene and 2-aminofluorene as positive control compounds. No differences were observed in the genotoxicity results in the groups treated with the positive control. However, the S9 fraction induced by Aroclor 1254 showed higher cytochrome P450 activity than the fraction induced by phenobarbital and beta-naphthoflavone. The incubation method also affected the results; the nitrosamine compounds showed different genotoxicity activity between the plate incorporation method and preincubation method. In-house aminomethyl quinoline compounds also showed different results depending on the S9 type. These results suggest that different inducers and methods induce various metabolic enzyme activities, which may lead to differences in genotoxicity through distinct metabolite production.</p>","PeriodicalId":23177,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15376516.2024.2443543","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rat S9 microsome fraction is commonly used to assess compound metabolite formation during in vitro genotoxicity assessments. However, methods using S9 have not been standardized for genotoxicity studies, and different experimental methods are used at various facilities. Therefore, this study investigated whether the differences between the two experimental conditions (1) S9 inducers, phenobarbital + beta-naphthoflavones vs. Aroclor 1254 and (2) the plate incubation vs. preincubation method) in the micro-Ames test would affect the results. Nitrosamine and in-house genotoxicity-positive compounds were used with benzopyrene and 2-aminofluorene as positive control compounds. No differences were observed in the genotoxicity results in the groups treated with the positive control. However, the S9 fraction induced by Aroclor 1254 showed higher cytochrome P450 activity than the fraction induced by phenobarbital and beta-naphthoflavone. The incubation method also affected the results; the nitrosamine compounds showed different genotoxicity activity between the plate incorporation method and preincubation method. In-house aminomethyl quinoline compounds also showed different results depending on the S9 type. These results suggest that different inducers and methods induce various metabolic enzyme activities, which may lead to differences in genotoxicity through distinct metabolite production.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同微粒体酶诱导剂处理大鼠肝脏S9微粒体代谢物遗传毒性试验结果的差异。
在体外遗传毒性评估中,大鼠S9微粒体通常用于评估化合物代谢物的形成。然而,使用S9的方法尚未标准化用于遗传毒性研究,在不同的设施中使用不同的实验方法。因此,本研究考察了两种实验条件(1)S9诱诱剂,苯巴比妥+ β -萘黄酮与Aroclor 1254,(2)平板培养法与预培养法)在微ames实验中的差异是否会影响结果。亚硝胺和内部基因毒性阳性化合物与苯并芘和2-氨基芴作为阳性对照化合物。阳性对照处理组的遗传毒性结果无差异。而Aroclor 1254诱导的S9部位细胞色素P450活性高于苯巴比妥和-萘黄酮诱导的S9部位。孵育方法对结果也有影响;亚硝胺类化合物在平板掺入法和预孵育法中表现出不同的遗传毒性活性。内部氨基甲基喹啉化合物根据S9类型也显示出不同的结果。这些结果表明,不同的诱导剂和方法诱导不同的代谢酶活性,可能通过不同的代谢物产生不同的遗传毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods is a peer-reviewed journal whose aim is twofold. Firstly, the journal contains original research on subjects dealing with the mechanisms by which foreign chemicals cause toxic tissue injury. Chemical substances of interest include industrial compounds, environmental pollutants, hazardous wastes, drugs, pesticides, and chemical warfare agents. The scope of the journal spans from molecular and cellular mechanisms of action to the consideration of mechanistic evidence in establishing regulatory policy. Secondly, the journal addresses aspects of the development, validation, and application of new and existing laboratory methods, techniques, and equipment.
期刊最新文献
Integrated transcriptomic and proteomic analyses reveal the effects of chronic benzene exposure on the central nervous system in mice. Evaluation and comparison of DNA alkylation and oxidative damage in e-cigarette and heated tobacco users. Chronic ethanol exposure induces cardiac fibroblast transdifferentiation via ceramide accumulation and oxidative stress. Insights into mitochondrial creatine kinase: examining preventive role of creatine supplement in doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Leveraging new approach methodologies: ecotoxicological modelling of endocrine disrupting chemicals to Danio rerio through machine learning and toxicity studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1