Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes after Local Flap Coverage versus Amputation for Complex Lower Extremity Trauma.

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-24 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1791741
Neel Bhagat, Connor Drake, Steven Dawson, Scott N Loewenstein, Kevin R Knox, Joshua M Adkinson, Aladdin H Hassanein, Ravinder Bamba
{"title":"Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes after Local Flap Coverage versus Amputation for Complex Lower Extremity Trauma.","authors":"Neel Bhagat, Connor Drake, Steven Dawson, Scott N Loewenstein, Kevin R Knox, Joshua M Adkinson, Aladdin H Hassanein, Ravinder Bamba","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1791741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  There is a paucity of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) data in lower extremity salvage. Limb salvage can often be achieved with the use of local muscle flaps or fasciocutaneous flaps. The purpose of this study was to compare PROs of patients who underwent lower extremity salvage using local fasciocutaneous flaps or muscle flaps to lower extremity amputation. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  The outcomes of 61 patients that underwent lower extremity local flap reconstruction ( <i>n</i>  = 33) or amputation ( <i>n</i>  = 28) between 2014 and 2020 were recorded. Chart reviews were performed to collect perioperative data. Patients were contacted via telephone for participation in the survey portion of our study. PROs were recorded utilizing both the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). <b>Results</b>  Surveys were completed by 61 patients (response rate 59.2%). The mean time of survey after flap reconstruction or amputation was 2.7 ± 1.4 years. Recent trauma (within 90 days) was the most common indication for local flap coverage ( <i>n</i>  = 23). LEFS score and SF-36 physical functioning scores were significantly lower in patients who underwent muscle flaps compared with fasciocutaneous flaps ( <i>p</i>  = 0.021 and <i>p</i>  = 0.022). Muscle flap patients had similar LEFS and SF-36 scores to amputation patients, while fasciocutaneous flap patients had significantly higher LEFS ( <i>p</i>  = 0.01), SF-36 physical functioning ( <i>p</i>  = 0.031), physical role functioning ( <i>p</i>  = 0.031), and emotional role functioning ( <i>p</i>  = 0.047) scores than amputation patients. <b>Conclusion</b>  Patients who underwent local fasciocutaneous flaps for limb salvage reported higher PRO scores than those undergoing amputation, while patients undergoing muscle flaps reported outcomes similar to those undergoing amputation. PROs for muscle flap patients were significantly lower than those of fasciocutaneous flap patients. These data suggest that while fasciocutaneous and muscle flaps are both useful limb salvage procedures, fasciocutaneous flaps may confer advantages that result in improved patient-perceived outcomes. Further study is needed to better characterize outcomes in limb salvage.</p>","PeriodicalId":47204,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":"57 Suppl 1","pages":"S36-S42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11684903/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1791741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background  There is a paucity of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) data in lower extremity salvage. Limb salvage can often be achieved with the use of local muscle flaps or fasciocutaneous flaps. The purpose of this study was to compare PROs of patients who underwent lower extremity salvage using local fasciocutaneous flaps or muscle flaps to lower extremity amputation. Materials and Methods  The outcomes of 61 patients that underwent lower extremity local flap reconstruction ( n  = 33) or amputation ( n  = 28) between 2014 and 2020 were recorded. Chart reviews were performed to collect perioperative data. Patients were contacted via telephone for participation in the survey portion of our study. PROs were recorded utilizing both the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Results  Surveys were completed by 61 patients (response rate 59.2%). The mean time of survey after flap reconstruction or amputation was 2.7 ± 1.4 years. Recent trauma (within 90 days) was the most common indication for local flap coverage ( n  = 23). LEFS score and SF-36 physical functioning scores were significantly lower in patients who underwent muscle flaps compared with fasciocutaneous flaps ( p  = 0.021 and p  = 0.022). Muscle flap patients had similar LEFS and SF-36 scores to amputation patients, while fasciocutaneous flap patients had significantly higher LEFS ( p  = 0.01), SF-36 physical functioning ( p  = 0.031), physical role functioning ( p  = 0.031), and emotional role functioning ( p  = 0.047) scores than amputation patients. Conclusion  Patients who underwent local fasciocutaneous flaps for limb salvage reported higher PRO scores than those undergoing amputation, while patients undergoing muscle flaps reported outcomes similar to those undergoing amputation. PROs for muscle flap patients were significantly lower than those of fasciocutaneous flap patients. These data suggest that while fasciocutaneous and muscle flaps are both useful limb salvage procedures, fasciocutaneous flaps may confer advantages that result in improved patient-perceived outcomes. Further study is needed to better characterize outcomes in limb salvage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部皮瓣覆盖与截肢治疗复杂下肢创伤患者报告结果的比较。
背景:在下肢抢救方面,缺乏患者报告的预后(PROs)数据。残肢通常可以通过使用局部肌肉瓣或筋膜皮瓣来实现。本研究的目的是比较使用局部筋膜皮瓣或肌肉皮瓣进行下肢截肢的患者的PROs。材料与方法回顾性分析2014 ~ 2020年行下肢局部皮瓣重建(33例)或截肢(28例)的61例患者的预后。进行图表回顾以收集围手术期数据。通过电话联系患者参与我们研究的调查部分。使用下肢功能量表(LEFS)和36项简短健康调查(SF-36)记录pro。结果61例患者完成问卷调查,有效率59.2%。皮瓣重建或截肢后的平均调查时间为2.7±1.4年。近期创伤(90天内)是局部皮瓣覆盖最常见的指征(n = 23)。与筋膜皮瓣相比,肌肉皮瓣患者的LEFS评分和SF-36身体功能评分显著降低(p = 0.021和p = 0.022)。肌肉瓣患者的LEFS和SF-36评分与截肢患者相似,筋膜皮瓣患者的LEFS (p = 0.01)、SF-36身体功能(p = 0.031)、身体角色功能(p = 0.031)和情绪角色功能(p = 0.047)评分均显著高于截肢患者。结论局部筋膜皮瓣保肢患者的PRO评分高于截肢患者,而肌肉皮瓣患者的预后与截肢患者相似。肌皮瓣组的PROs明显低于筋膜皮瓣组。这些数据表明,虽然筋膜皮瓣和肌肉皮瓣都是有用的肢体保留手术,但筋膜皮瓣可能具有改善患者感知结果的优势。需要进一步的研究来更好地描述肢体保留的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
64
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery (ISSN : 0970-0358) is biannual publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. Bibliographic listings: The journal is indexed with Bioline International, Caspur, DOAJ, EBSCO Publishing’s Electronic Databases, Expanded Academic ASAP, Genamics JournalSeek, Google Scholar, Health & Wellness Research Center, Health Reference Center Academic, Hinari, Index Copernicus, IndMed, OpenJGate, PubMed, Pubmed Central, Scimago Journal Ranking, SCOLOAR, SCOPUS, SIIC databases, SNEMB, Ulrich’s International Periodical Directory
期刊最新文献
A Decade of Transforming Journey with IJPS. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery in India Is Poised for Exponential Growth and Global Dominance. Correction of Gummy Smile: An Essential Procedure in Facial Aesthetics. Gynecomastia: The 4Dx technique. Students Have Changed; Medical Teachers Should Change Too.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1