Clinicopathological presentation of liver abscesses and hydatid liver disease from two South African tertiary hospitals.

IF 2.5 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY World Journal of Hepatology Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.4254/wjh.v16.i12.1417
Krevosha Pillay, Zafar Ahmed Khan, Ekene Emmanuel Nweke, Jones Omoshoro-Jones
{"title":"Clinicopathological presentation of liver abscesses and hydatid liver disease from two South African tertiary hospitals.","authors":"Krevosha Pillay, Zafar Ahmed Khan, Ekene Emmanuel Nweke, Jones Omoshoro-Jones","doi":"10.4254/wjh.v16.i12.1417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatic abscesses represent infections of the liver parenchyma from bacteria, fungi, and parasitic organisms. Trends in both abscess microbiology and management of abscesses (infective collections) have changed over the past decade. There is a paucity of published data regarding the clinicopathological features of liver abscesses in sub-Saharan Africa and other low-income and middle-income countries.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the clinical presentations of liver abscesses and hydatid liver disease at two South African tertiary-level hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Information accessed from electronic discharge summaries of patients from two South African referral hospitals in Johannesburg, South Africa from January 2016 to December 2020 were reviewed and analyzed. All patients older than 13 years presenting with infective liver collections (pyogenic, amoebic) and hydatid disease were included. Clinical findings and laboratory, microbiology, and radiology results and outcomes were collated and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 222 patients were included. There were 123 males (55.41%) and 99 females (44.59%), with a median age of 48 years. Comorbidities included HIV (24.23%), hypertension (20.57%), and diabetes mellitus (16.83%). The majority (74.77%) of abscesses were pyogenic, while amoebic and hydatid abscesses represented 16.22% and 9.01%, respectively. The predominant etiology of the pyogenic liver abscesses (PLA) was biliary-related disease. WBC and C-reactive protein were significantly higher in the pyogenic group (<i>P</i> < 0.0002 and <i>P</i> < 0.007, respectively) when compared to the amoebic and hydatid groups. In patients with PLAs, organisms were cultured on blood in 17.58% and abscess fluid in 56.60%. <i>Klebsiella</i>, <i>Escherichia coli</i> and <i>Streptococci</i> were the most cultured organisms. Sixteen percent of the cultures were polymicrobial. In the overall group, 76.00% (<i>n</i> = 169) of patients requiring drainage had a percutaneous transhepatic catheter drain placed, while 8.76% (<i>n</i> = 19) had open surgery. The median length of hospital stay was 13 days. The mortality rate was 3.02%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, the most common type of liver abscess was PLAs of biliary origin in middle-aged males. The microbiology was similar to those described in Asian populations, and non-surgical management <i>via</i> percutaneous drainage was sufficient in the majority of cases with acceptable morbidity and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":23687,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Hepatology","volume":"16 12","pages":"1417-1428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11686533/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v16.i12.1417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hepatic abscesses represent infections of the liver parenchyma from bacteria, fungi, and parasitic organisms. Trends in both abscess microbiology and management of abscesses (infective collections) have changed over the past decade. There is a paucity of published data regarding the clinicopathological features of liver abscesses in sub-Saharan Africa and other low-income and middle-income countries.

Aim: To evaluate the clinical presentations of liver abscesses and hydatid liver disease at two South African tertiary-level hospitals.

Methods: Information accessed from electronic discharge summaries of patients from two South African referral hospitals in Johannesburg, South Africa from January 2016 to December 2020 were reviewed and analyzed. All patients older than 13 years presenting with infective liver collections (pyogenic, amoebic) and hydatid disease were included. Clinical findings and laboratory, microbiology, and radiology results and outcomes were collated and analyzed.

Results: In total, 222 patients were included. There were 123 males (55.41%) and 99 females (44.59%), with a median age of 48 years. Comorbidities included HIV (24.23%), hypertension (20.57%), and diabetes mellitus (16.83%). The majority (74.77%) of abscesses were pyogenic, while amoebic and hydatid abscesses represented 16.22% and 9.01%, respectively. The predominant etiology of the pyogenic liver abscesses (PLA) was biliary-related disease. WBC and C-reactive protein were significantly higher in the pyogenic group (P < 0.0002 and P < 0.007, respectively) when compared to the amoebic and hydatid groups. In patients with PLAs, organisms were cultured on blood in 17.58% and abscess fluid in 56.60%. Klebsiella, Escherichia coli and Streptococci were the most cultured organisms. Sixteen percent of the cultures were polymicrobial. In the overall group, 76.00% (n = 169) of patients requiring drainage had a percutaneous transhepatic catheter drain placed, while 8.76% (n = 19) had open surgery. The median length of hospital stay was 13 days. The mortality rate was 3.02%.

Conclusion: In this study, the most common type of liver abscess was PLAs of biliary origin in middle-aged males. The microbiology was similar to those described in Asian populations, and non-surgical management via percutaneous drainage was sufficient in the majority of cases with acceptable morbidity and mortality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两家南非三级医院肝脓肿和包虫病的临床病理表现。
背景:肝脓肿是由细菌、真菌和寄生生物引起的肝实质感染。在过去的十年中,脓肿微生物学和脓肿管理(感染性收集)的趋势发生了变化。关于撒哈拉以南非洲和其他低收入和中等收入国家肝脓肿的临床病理特征的公开数据缺乏。目的:评价南非两家三级医院肝脓肿和包虫病的临床表现。方法:对2016年1月至2020年12月南非约翰内斯堡两家南非转诊医院患者电子出院摘要信息进行回顾分析。所有年龄大于13岁的患者均伴有感染性肝脏积液(化脓性、阿米巴性)和包虫病。对临床表现、实验室、微生物学和放射学结果进行整理和分析。结果:共纳入222例患者。男性123例(55.41%),女性99例(44.59%),中位年龄48岁。合并症包括HIV(24.23%)、高血压(20.57%)和糖尿病(16.83%)。脓肿以化脓性为主(74.77%),阿米巴脓肿和包虫脓肿分别占16.22%和9.01%。化脓性肝脓肿(PLA)的主要病因是胆道相关疾病。与阿米巴和包虫组相比,化脓性组WBC和c反应蛋白显著升高(P < 0.0002和P < 0.007)。在plaas患者中,17.58%的人在血液中培养,56.60%的人在脓肿液中培养。克雷伯菌、大肠杆菌和链球菌是培养最多的细菌。16%的培养物是多微生物。在整个组中,76.00% (n = 169)的患者需要经皮经肝导管引流,8.76% (n = 19)的患者需要开腹手术。住院时间中位数为13天。死亡率为3.02%。结论:在本研究中,中年男性中最常见的肝脓肿类型为胆道源性肝脓肿。微生物学与亚洲人群相似,大多数病例的发病率和死亡率都可以接受,通过经皮引流的非手术治疗就足够了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Hepatology
World Journal of Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
172
期刊最新文献
Helicobacter pylori infection as a contributing factor to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: A population-based insight. Advances and challenges in molecular understanding, early detection, and targeted treatment of liver cancer. Clinical features of abnormal α-fetoprotein in 15 patients with chronic viral hepatitis B after treatment with antiviral drugs. Effectiveness of RESET care program: A real-world-evidence on managing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease through digital health interventions. Gut microbiome composition in patients with liver cirrhosis with and without hepatic encephalopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1