Dermatologische Diagnostik bei Patient*innen mit „skin of color“ – Wie sicher fühlen sich deutsche Dermatolog*innen?

Can Alpagut , Christian Volberg , Michael Hertl , Lisa Krönig , Martin Gschnell
{"title":"Dermatologische Diagnostik bei Patient*innen mit „skin of color“ – Wie sicher fühlen sich deutsche Dermatolog*innen?","authors":"Can Alpagut ,&nbsp;Christian Volberg ,&nbsp;Michael Hertl ,&nbsp;Lisa Krönig ,&nbsp;Martin Gschnell","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2024.11.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Diagnosis in dermatology is primarily based on the assessment and description of the clinical appearance of the skin. The German medical literature focuses almost exclusively on white skin, so it is questionable whether this one-sided training is sufficient to do justice to all patients since the diversity of skin types increases.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Online survey among German dermatologists regarding training and experience in the diagnosis of dark skin, difficulties in recognizing dermatoses and the desire for training and further education in skin diseases of “skin of color”.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 236 responses were received. 65 % of participants felt unsure to very unsure about recognizing skin conditions in people with dark skin. Training in the recognition of skin types IV–VI was rated as poor to very poor by 76 %, and 73 % rated the current literature on the diagnosis of dark skin as poor to very poor. 89 % reported that they have difficulties in diagnosing skin diseases in dark skin in their daily practice.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is uncertainty among German dermatologists in the diagnosis of skin diseases in people with dark skin. This diagnostic uncertainty may lead to poorer treatment outcomes. More training opportunities should be offered to improve skills in the diagnosis and treatment of skin diseases in skin of color and the associated care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"192 ","pages":"Pages 28-35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921724002721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Diagnosis in dermatology is primarily based on the assessment and description of the clinical appearance of the skin. The German medical literature focuses almost exclusively on white skin, so it is questionable whether this one-sided training is sufficient to do justice to all patients since the diversity of skin types increases.

Methods

Online survey among German dermatologists regarding training and experience in the diagnosis of dark skin, difficulties in recognizing dermatoses and the desire for training and further education in skin diseases of “skin of color”.

Results

A total of 236 responses were received. 65 % of participants felt unsure to very unsure about recognizing skin conditions in people with dark skin. Training in the recognition of skin types IV–VI was rated as poor to very poor by 76 %, and 73 % rated the current literature on the diagnosis of dark skin as poor to very poor. 89 % reported that they have difficulties in diagnosing skin diseases in dark skin in their daily practice.

Conclusion

There is uncertainty among German dermatologists in the diagnosis of skin diseases in people with dark skin. This diagnostic uncertainty may lead to poorer treatment outcomes. More training opportunities should be offered to improve skills in the diagnosis and treatment of skin diseases in skin of color and the associated care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“有色皮肤”患者的皮肤科诊断——德国皮肤科医生有多自信?]
简介:皮肤科的诊断主要是基于对皮肤临床表现的评估和描述。德国医学文献几乎只关注白色皮肤,因此,由于皮肤类型的多样性增加,这种片面的训练是否足以公平对待所有患者,这是值得怀疑的。方法:对德国皮肤科医生进行在线调查,了解他们在深色皮肤诊断方面的培训和经验、识别皮肤病的困难以及对“有色皮肤”皮肤病培训和继续教育的愿望。结果:共收到236份回复。65%的参与者对识别深色皮肤的人的皮肤状况感到不确定或非常不确定。76%的人将识别皮肤类型IV-VI的培训评为差到非常差,73%的人将目前关于黑皮肤诊断的文献评为差到非常差。89%的人报告说,他们在日常实践中难以诊断深色皮肤的皮肤病。结论:德国皮肤科医生对深色皮肤人群皮肤病的诊断存在不确定性。这种诊断的不确定性可能导致较差的治疗结果。应提供更多的培训机会,以提高有色人种皮肤病的诊断和治疗技能以及相关护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
期刊最新文献
[Active involvement of patients in primary care research: Evaluation of the NRW.GPRN patient advisory board]. [Nursing through a child's eyes - A qualitative image analysis of children's drawings]. Barriers to opioid substitution therapy in primary care: A survey among general practitioners in Germany. [The KKS examiner course as a qualification measure for GP practices to participate in clinical research: A qualitative study with participants from the SaxoForN research practice network]. Reliability and validity of the German "Evidence-Based Practice Confidence (EPIC) Scale" for allied health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1