A Pilot Open-Label Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Acceptability of the IntegriMedical® Needle Free Injection System versus a Conventional Needle-Based System in Healthy Volunteers, Using Normal Saline as a Placebo.
{"title":"A Pilot Open-Label Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Acceptability of the IntegriMedical® Needle Free Injection System versus a Conventional Needle-Based System in Healthy Volunteers, Using Normal Saline as a Placebo.","authors":"Almas Pathan, Kavitha Shetty Narasimha, Ankur Naik, Arati Ranade","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S491883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and acceptability of the IntegriMedical® Needle Free Injection System (IM-NFIS) compared to conventional hypodermic needle injections (CHN) in healthy adult subjects across multiple injection sites.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Thirty healthy male subjects aged 18-45 years were enrolled in this open-label study. Each subject received both NF and CHN injections at five different sites (forearm, abdomen, thigh, buttocks, and arm). In the study, participants in the forearm cohort received 0.1 mL of saline, whereas, for all other injection sites, 0.5 mL of saline was administered. Both needle-free and hypodermic needle injections were used at the designated sites, with a 5- to 10-minute interval between each injection. Since no active drug was used, saline served as a placebo in both methods. Safety assessments included local and systemic reactions, pain scores using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and acceptability questionnaires. The study adhered to ethical guidelines and was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NF injections demonstrated significantly lower pain scores compared to CHN injections (mean VAS score 0.23 vs 1.07, p < 0.01). Local site reactions were minimal and similar between NF and CHN injections, with no significant differences observed at 20-30 minutes post-injection. Systemic reactions were absent in both groups throughout the study period. The NF injection system was highly acceptable, with a majority of subjects reporting reduced anxiety and pain compared to CHN injections (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IM-NFIS proved to be safe, well tolerated, and highly acceptable for delivering pharmaceuticals compared to conventional needle and syringe injections. This needle-free technology offers potential advantages in improving patient compliance and reducing injection-related anxieties, suggesting its promising role in future medical practices, including pediatric vaccinations and frequent medication administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"525-536"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11687312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S491883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The study aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and acceptability of the IntegriMedical® Needle Free Injection System (IM-NFIS) compared to conventional hypodermic needle injections (CHN) in healthy adult subjects across multiple injection sites.
Patients and methods: Thirty healthy male subjects aged 18-45 years were enrolled in this open-label study. Each subject received both NF and CHN injections at five different sites (forearm, abdomen, thigh, buttocks, and arm). In the study, participants in the forearm cohort received 0.1 mL of saline, whereas, for all other injection sites, 0.5 mL of saline was administered. Both needle-free and hypodermic needle injections were used at the designated sites, with a 5- to 10-minute interval between each injection. Since no active drug was used, saline served as a placebo in both methods. Safety assessments included local and systemic reactions, pain scores using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and acceptability questionnaires. The study adhered to ethical guidelines and was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee.
Results: NF injections demonstrated significantly lower pain scores compared to CHN injections (mean VAS score 0.23 vs 1.07, p < 0.01). Local site reactions were minimal and similar between NF and CHN injections, with no significant differences observed at 20-30 minutes post-injection. Systemic reactions were absent in both groups throughout the study period. The NF injection system was highly acceptable, with a majority of subjects reporting reduced anxiety and pain compared to CHN injections (p < 0.01).
Conclusion: IM-NFIS proved to be safe, well tolerated, and highly acceptable for delivering pharmaceuticals compared to conventional needle and syringe injections. This needle-free technology offers potential advantages in improving patient compliance and reducing injection-related anxieties, suggesting its promising role in future medical practices, including pediatric vaccinations and frequent medication administration.
目的:本研究旨在评估IntegriMedical®无针注射系统(IM-NFIS)在健康成人多个注射部位与传统皮下针注射(CHN)相比的安全性、耐受性和可接受性。患者和方法:30名年龄在18-45岁的健康男性受试者参加了这项开放标签研究。每位受试者在五个不同部位(前臂、腹部、大腿、臀部和手臂)注射NF和CHN。在这项研究中,前臂队列的参与者接受0.1 mL生理盐水,而对于所有其他注射部位,给予0.5 mL生理盐水。在指定部位使用无针和皮下针注射,每次注射间隔5至10分钟。由于没有使用有效药物,在两种方法中,生理盐水作为安慰剂。安全性评估包括局部和全身反应,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行疼痛评分,以及可接受性问卷。这项研究遵循了伦理准则,并得到了机构伦理委员会的批准。结果:NF注射组疼痛评分明显低于CHN注射组(VAS平均评分0.23 vs 1.07, p < 0.01)。注射NF和CHN之间的局部反应最小且相似,注射后20-30分钟未观察到显著差异。两组患者在整个研究期间均未出现全身反应。NF注射系统是高度可接受的,与CHN注射相比,大多数受试者报告焦虑和疼痛减轻(p < 0.01)。结论:与传统的针头和注射器注射相比,IM-NFIS被证明是安全的,耐受性良好,并且高度可接受。这种无针技术在提高患者依从性和减少注射相关焦虑方面具有潜在的优势,这表明它在未来的医疗实践中有前景,包括儿科疫苗接种和频繁的药物管理。