MRI-derived radiomics and end-to-end deep learning models for predicting glioma ATRX status: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies
Amir Mahmoud Ahmadzadeh , Nima Broomand Lomer , Mohammad Amin Ashoobi , Girish Bathla , Houman Sotoudeh
{"title":"MRI-derived radiomics and end-to-end deep learning models for predicting glioma ATRX status: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies","authors":"Amir Mahmoud Ahmadzadeh , Nima Broomand Lomer , Mohammad Amin Ashoobi , Girish Bathla , Houman Sotoudeh","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived radiomics/end-to-end deep learning (DL) models in predicting glioma alpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked (ATRX) status. We conducted a comprehensive search across four major databases—Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. All the studies that assessed the performance of radiomics and/or end-to-end DL models for predicting glioma ATRX status were included. Quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) criteria and the METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS). Pooled estimates for performance metrics were calculated. I-squared was used to assess heterogeneity, while subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to find its potential sources. Publication bias was assessed using Deeks' funnel plots. Seventeen and eleven studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, respectively. Most of the studies had a low risk of bias and low concern for applicability according to the QUADAS-2. Also, most of them had good quality according to the METRICS. Meta-analysis showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.80 (95%CI: 0.71–0.96), a specificity of 0.82 (95%CI: 0.67–0.93), a positive diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR) of 6.77 (95%CI: 4.67–9.82), a negative DLR of 0.15 (95%CI: 0.06–0.38), a diagnostic odds ratio of 30.36 (95%CI: 15.87–58.05), and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.92 (95%CI: 0.89–0.94). Subgroup analysis revealed significant intergroup differences based on several factors. Radiomics models can accurately predict ATRX status in gliomas, enhancing non-invasive tumor characterization and guiding treatment strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 110386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124003164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived radiomics/end-to-end deep learning (DL) models in predicting glioma alpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked (ATRX) status. We conducted a comprehensive search across four major databases—Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. All the studies that assessed the performance of radiomics and/or end-to-end DL models for predicting glioma ATRX status were included. Quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) criteria and the METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS). Pooled estimates for performance metrics were calculated. I-squared was used to assess heterogeneity, while subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to find its potential sources. Publication bias was assessed using Deeks' funnel plots. Seventeen and eleven studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, respectively. Most of the studies had a low risk of bias and low concern for applicability according to the QUADAS-2. Also, most of them had good quality according to the METRICS. Meta-analysis showed a pooled sensitivity of 0.80 (95%CI: 0.71–0.96), a specificity of 0.82 (95%CI: 0.67–0.93), a positive diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR) of 6.77 (95%CI: 4.67–9.82), a negative DLR of 0.15 (95%CI: 0.06–0.38), a diagnostic odds ratio of 30.36 (95%CI: 15.87–58.05), and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.92 (95%CI: 0.89–0.94). Subgroup analysis revealed significant intergroup differences based on several factors. Radiomics models can accurately predict ATRX status in gliomas, enhancing non-invasive tumor characterization and guiding treatment strategies.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include:
-Body Imaging-
Breast Imaging-
Cardiothoracic Imaging-
Imaging Physics and Informatics-
Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine-
Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging-
Neuroradiology-
Practice, Policy & Education-
Pediatric Imaging-
Vascular and Interventional Radiology