Ryan B Rush, Westin Klein, Sloan W Rush, Robert M Reinauer
{"title":"Real-World Outcomes in Pre-Existing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Subjects Undergoing Avacincaptad Therapy for Geographic Atrophy.","authors":"Ryan B Rush, Westin Klein, Sloan W Rush, Robert M Reinauer","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S497678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate real-world outcomes in subjects with pre-existing neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) undergoing intravitreal avacincaptad pegol (IVA) treatment for geographic atrophy (GA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was undertaken as a retrospective, case-controlled assessment of patients undergoing IVA treatment for GA from 2 community-based retina practices. Patients were separated into 1) a Study Group consisting of subjects with pre-existing neovascular AMD prior to initiation of IVA for GA, and 2) a Control Group consisting of AMD subjects without neovascularization prior to initiation of IVA for GA. Study and Control Group subjects had a baseline visual acuity of ≥ 20/200, a total GA lesion area of ≥ 1 mm<sup>2</sup> and ≤ 17.5 mm<sup>2</sup>, and follow-up of 12-months following IVA commencement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 64 patients were analyzed. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were found between cohorts. The Study Group had a greater decrease in visual acuity [-0.2 (-0.24 to -0.16) logMAR versus -0.04 (-0.06 to 0.02) logMAR; p<0.0001], a greater increase in GA lesion growth [1.36 (1.09-1.63) mm<sup>2</sup> versus 0.52 (0.34-0.70) mm<sup>2</sup>; p<0.0001], and a higher incidence of exudation (p=0.0002) compared to the Control Group during the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that patients undergoing IVA therapy for GA with pre-existing neovascular AMD have worse visual and anatomic outcomes at 12-months compared to a matched control group without pre-existing neovascularization; such patients therefore should be carefully counseled prior to initiation of IVA for the management of GA.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"18 ","pages":"4011-4018"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11687279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S497678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate real-world outcomes in subjects with pre-existing neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) undergoing intravitreal avacincaptad pegol (IVA) treatment for geographic atrophy (GA).
Methods: This study was undertaken as a retrospective, case-controlled assessment of patients undergoing IVA treatment for GA from 2 community-based retina practices. Patients were separated into 1) a Study Group consisting of subjects with pre-existing neovascular AMD prior to initiation of IVA for GA, and 2) a Control Group consisting of AMD subjects without neovascularization prior to initiation of IVA for GA. Study and Control Group subjects had a baseline visual acuity of ≥ 20/200, a total GA lesion area of ≥ 1 mm2 and ≤ 17.5 mm2, and follow-up of 12-months following IVA commencement.
Results: A total of 64 patients were analyzed. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were found between cohorts. The Study Group had a greater decrease in visual acuity [-0.2 (-0.24 to -0.16) logMAR versus -0.04 (-0.06 to 0.02) logMAR; p<0.0001], a greater increase in GA lesion growth [1.36 (1.09-1.63) mm2 versus 0.52 (0.34-0.70) mm2; p<0.0001], and a higher incidence of exudation (p=0.0002) compared to the Control Group during the study period.
Conclusion: This study suggests that patients undergoing IVA therapy for GA with pre-existing neovascular AMD have worse visual and anatomic outcomes at 12-months compared to a matched control group without pre-existing neovascularization; such patients therefore should be carefully counseled prior to initiation of IVA for the management of GA.