Redefined Formula for Anterior Chamber Volume Calculation: Quantitative Analysis of Biometric Parameters Across Ocular Pathologies.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2024-12-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S495068
Arturs Zemitis, Vincenzo Rizzuto, Diana Lavrinovica, Juris Vanags, Guna Laganovska
{"title":"Redefined Formula for Anterior Chamber Volume Calculation: Quantitative Analysis of Biometric Parameters Across Ocular Pathologies.","authors":"Arturs Zemitis, Vincenzo Rizzuto, Diana Lavrinovica, Juris Vanags, Guna Laganovska","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S495068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the discrepancies between ACV measurements obtained from the Heidelberg Anterion and Zeiss IOLMaster 700 and investigates the significance of ACV and other ocular biometry parameters.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>To investigate intraocular fluid circulation, a robust formula was developed for ACV measurement using the Zeiss IOLMaster 700. A pilot study was conducted to validate this formula, which relied on WTW, CCT, and ACD. The formula used was ACV = (RAC)^2 × (CCD) × 1.51. ACV measurements showed a median of 155.38 (IQR = 131.15-180.06) for the Heidelberg Anterion and 144.11 mm³ (IQR = 125.62-159.81) for the Zeiss IOLMaster 700. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for ACV was 0.908, indicating excellent agreement between devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intraocular fluid volume was significantly lower in eyes with PEXS compared to those without. Eyes with PEX had an ACV of 133 ± 28.3 mm³ versus 142 ± 30.7 mm³ in non-PEX eyes, a statistically significant difference (t (196) = -2.09, p = 0.038, d = -0.301). Significant differences were also observed in ACD and AL between PEX and non-PEX eyes, with PEX eyes showing reduced measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings reveal that age-related changes in ACD and ACV are significant, with the redefined formula showing excellent agreement with AS-OCT methods. Eyes with PEX exhibit reduced ACD, ACV, and AL measurements. Additionally, an accessible method for ACV measurement, not relying on Pentacam or AS-OCT, would be valuable, particularly in developing countries, to facilitate broader clinical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"18 ","pages":"3989-3998"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11687106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S495068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluates the discrepancies between ACV measurements obtained from the Heidelberg Anterion and Zeiss IOLMaster 700 and investigates the significance of ACV and other ocular biometry parameters.

Patients and methods: To investigate intraocular fluid circulation, a robust formula was developed for ACV measurement using the Zeiss IOLMaster 700. A pilot study was conducted to validate this formula, which relied on WTW, CCT, and ACD. The formula used was ACV = (RAC)^2 × (CCD) × 1.51. ACV measurements showed a median of 155.38 (IQR = 131.15-180.06) for the Heidelberg Anterion and 144.11 mm³ (IQR = 125.62-159.81) for the Zeiss IOLMaster 700. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for ACV was 0.908, indicating excellent agreement between devices.

Results: Intraocular fluid volume was significantly lower in eyes with PEXS compared to those without. Eyes with PEX had an ACV of 133 ± 28.3 mm³ versus 142 ± 30.7 mm³ in non-PEX eyes, a statistically significant difference (t (196) = -2.09, p = 0.038, d = -0.301). Significant differences were also observed in ACD and AL between PEX and non-PEX eyes, with PEX eyes showing reduced measurements.

Conclusion: Our findings reveal that age-related changes in ACD and ACV are significant, with the redefined formula showing excellent agreement with AS-OCT methods. Eyes with PEX exhibit reduced ACD, ACV, and AL measurements. Additionally, an accessible method for ACV measurement, not relying on Pentacam or AS-OCT, would be valuable, particularly in developing countries, to facilitate broader clinical research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前房容积计算的重新定义公式:眼病理生物特征参数的定量分析。
目的:本研究评估Heidelberg Anterion和Zeiss IOLMaster 700测量的ACV之间的差异,并探讨ACV和其他眼部生物测量参数的意义。患者和方法:为了研究眼内液体循环,使用蔡司IOLMaster 700开发了一个可靠的ACV测量公式。为了验证这一公式,进行了一项初步研究,该公式依赖于WTW、CCT和ACD。计算公式为ACV = (RAC)^2 × (CCD) × 1.51。ACV测量结果显示,海德堡Anterion的中位数为155.38 (IQR = 131.15-180.06),蔡司IOLMaster 700的中位数为144.11 mm³(IQR = 125.62-159.81)。ACV的类内相关系数(ICC)为0.908,表明设备间一致性良好。结果:PEXS组眼内液量明显低于无PEXS组。PEX组ACV为133±28.3 mm³,非PEX组为142±30.7 mm³,差异有统计学意义(t (196) = -2.09, p = 0.038, d = -0.301)。PEX和非PEX眼的ACD和AL也有显著差异,PEX眼的测量值降低。结论:我们的研究结果显示,ACD和ACV的年龄相关变化是显著的,重新定义的公式与AS-OCT方法非常吻合。患有PEX的眼睛显示ACD, ACV和AL测量值降低。此外,一种不依赖Pentacam或AS-OCT的可获得的ACV测量方法将是有价值的,特别是在发展中国家,以促进更广泛的临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of IMO vifa24plus(1-2) and Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2. Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction of Two Continuous Range of Vision Intraocular Lenses. Application of the 2021 AAPOS Guidelines in Clinics with Revision and Validation of SPOT Referral Criteria. Clinical Evaluation of Faricimab in Real-World Diabetic Macular Edema in India- A Multicenter Observational Study. Propensity Score to Compare Pars Plana Vitrectomy and Scleral Buckling in Retrospective Studies [Letter].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1