Short-Term Hormonal Changes Following Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction among Men with Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: Findings from a Large Longitudinal Prospective Multicentric Study.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 ANDROLOGY World Journal of Mens Health Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.5534/wjmh.240184
Fausto Negri, Edoardo Pozzi, Christian Corsini, Massimiliano Raffo, Federico Belladelli, Alessandro Bertini, Francesco Cattafi, Eugenio Ventimiglia, Rayan Matloob, Antonino Saccà, Luca Boeri, Alessia d'Arma, Francesco Montorsi, Andrea Salonia
{"title":"Short-Term Hormonal Changes Following Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction among Men with Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: Findings from a Large Longitudinal Prospective Multicentric Study.","authors":"Fausto Negri, Edoardo Pozzi, Christian Corsini, Massimiliano Raffo, Federico Belladelli, Alessandro Bertini, Francesco Cattafi, Eugenio Ventimiglia, Rayan Matloob, Antonino Saccà, Luca Boeri, Alessia d'Arma, Francesco Montorsi, Andrea Salonia","doi":"10.5534/wjmh.240184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aimed to investigate possible hormonal changes following microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) across three referral centers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We prospectively analyzed data from 102 consecutive NOA men. Patients with prior hormonal therapies were excluded. Preoperative serum hormone levels (total testosterone [tT], luteinizing hormone [LH], follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH], and 17β-estradiol) were collected, with repeat measurements at 3-month post-surgery. We divided the cohort into two groups using a tT cut-off value of 3 ng/mL: 1) men who kept eugonadal status; and, 2) men who were initially eugonadal but became testosterone deficient (TD) after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 37 years (32-40 years). Positive sperm retrieval during mTESE was observed in 34 (33.3%) patients, and 48 (47.1%) underwent bilateral mTESE. Compared to baseline, 3-month postoperative median (IQR) hormonal levels were as follows: tT: 3.71 ng/mL (2.76-5.24 ng/mL) <i>vs.</i> 4.27 ng/mL (3.25-6.07 ng/mL), p=0.32; FSH: 22.0 mIU/mL (12.65-31.47 mIU/mL) <i>vs.</i> 19.5 mIU/mL (11.63-25.8 mIU/mL), p=0.25; LH: 9.0 mIU/mL (5.11-12.4 mIU/mL) <i>vs.</i> 7.6 mIU/mL (5.04-13.4 mIU/mL), p=0.73, respectively. Twelve (13.5%) eugonadal men at baseline showed TD after mTESE. Median (IQR) tT values at baseline and 3-month follow-up were compared between those who preserved eugonadal status after surgery and those who became TD after surgery: baseline levels were 4.46 ng/mL (4.1-6.27 ng/mL) <i>vs.</i> 4.14 ng/mL (3.24-4.98 ng/mL), p=0.09; and, 3-month follow-up levels were 4.58 ng/mL (3.58-5.56 ng/mL) <i>vs.</i> 2.51 ng/mL (2.31-2.76 ng/mL), p<0.001, respectively. Men who developed TD had lower testicular volume (TV) (6 [4-10] vs. 10 [8-12.25] Prader, p=0.001) and karyotype abnormalities (4 [33.3] <i>vs.</i> 1 [1.3], p=0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This multicentric study shows that mTESE in men with NOA does not significantly impact short-time postoperative follow-up tT, LH, and FSH levels. A substantial proportion of men who were initially eugonadal demonstrated tT suggestive for TD at 3-month follow-up. These men had lower TV at baseline and abnormal karyotype.</p>","PeriodicalId":54261,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Mens Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Mens Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.240184","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to investigate possible hormonal changes following microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) across three referral centers.

Materials and methods: We prospectively analyzed data from 102 consecutive NOA men. Patients with prior hormonal therapies were excluded. Preoperative serum hormone levels (total testosterone [tT], luteinizing hormone [LH], follicle-stimulating hormone [FSH], and 17β-estradiol) were collected, with repeat measurements at 3-month post-surgery. We divided the cohort into two groups using a tT cut-off value of 3 ng/mL: 1) men who kept eugonadal status; and, 2) men who were initially eugonadal but became testosterone deficient (TD) after surgery.

Results: Overall, median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 37 years (32-40 years). Positive sperm retrieval during mTESE was observed in 34 (33.3%) patients, and 48 (47.1%) underwent bilateral mTESE. Compared to baseline, 3-month postoperative median (IQR) hormonal levels were as follows: tT: 3.71 ng/mL (2.76-5.24 ng/mL) vs. 4.27 ng/mL (3.25-6.07 ng/mL), p=0.32; FSH: 22.0 mIU/mL (12.65-31.47 mIU/mL) vs. 19.5 mIU/mL (11.63-25.8 mIU/mL), p=0.25; LH: 9.0 mIU/mL (5.11-12.4 mIU/mL) vs. 7.6 mIU/mL (5.04-13.4 mIU/mL), p=0.73, respectively. Twelve (13.5%) eugonadal men at baseline showed TD after mTESE. Median (IQR) tT values at baseline and 3-month follow-up were compared between those who preserved eugonadal status after surgery and those who became TD after surgery: baseline levels were 4.46 ng/mL (4.1-6.27 ng/mL) vs. 4.14 ng/mL (3.24-4.98 ng/mL), p=0.09; and, 3-month follow-up levels were 4.58 ng/mL (3.58-5.56 ng/mL) vs. 2.51 ng/mL (2.31-2.76 ng/mL), p<0.001, respectively. Men who developed TD had lower testicular volume (TV) (6 [4-10] vs. 10 [8-12.25] Prader, p=0.001) and karyotype abnormalities (4 [33.3] vs. 1 [1.3], p=0.006).

Conclusions: This multicentric study shows that mTESE in men with NOA does not significantly impact short-time postoperative follow-up tT, LH, and FSH levels. A substantial proportion of men who were initially eugonadal demonstrated tT suggestive for TD at 3-month follow-up. These men had lower TV at baseline and abnormal karyotype.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非阻塞性无精子症男性显微解剖睾丸精子提取后的短期激素变化:来自一项大型纵向前瞻性多中心研究的结果。
目的:我们旨在调查三个转诊中心的非阻塞性无精子症(NOA)患者在显微解剖睾丸精子提取(mTESE)后可能发生的激素变化。材料和方法:我们前瞻性地分析了102例连续NOA患者的资料。排除既往接受激素治疗的患者。收集术前血清激素水平(总睾酮[tT]、促黄体生成素[LH]、促卵泡激素[FSH]和17β-雌二醇),并于术后3个月重复测量。我们使用tT临界值为3 ng/mL将队列分为两组:1)保持性腺状态的男性;2)最初性腺正常但手术后出现睾酮缺乏(TD)的男性。结果:总体而言,年龄中位数(四分位数间距[IQR])为37岁(32-40岁)。34例(33.3%)患者在mTESE期间精子恢复阳性,48例(47.1%)患者接受了双侧mTESE。与基线相比,术后3个月中位(IQR)激素水平如下:tT: 3.71 ng/mL (2.76-5.24 ng/mL) vs. 4.27 ng/mL (3.25-6.07 ng/mL), p=0.32;FSH: 22.0 mIU/mL (12.65 ~ 31.47 mIU/mL) vs. 19.5 mIU/mL (11.63 ~ 25.8 mIU/mL), p=0.25;LH: 9.0 mIU/mL (5.11 ~ 12.4 mIU/mL) vs. 7.6 mIU/mL (5.04 ~ 13.4 mIU/mL), p=0.73。12名(13.5%)基线性腺正常的男性在mTESE后出现TD。在基线和3个月的随访中比较手术后保持性腺正常状态的患者和术后成为TD的患者的中位(IQR) tT值:基线水平为4.46 ng/mL (4.1-6.27 ng/mL) vs 4.14 ng/mL (3.24-4.98 ng/mL), p=0.09;3个月随访水平分别为4.58 ng/mL (3.58 ~ 5.56 ng/mL)和2.51 ng/mL (2.31 ~ 2.76 ng/mL)。[1.3], p=0.006)。结论:这项多中心研究表明,NOA男性患者的mTESE对术后短期随访的tT、LH和FSH水平没有显著影响。在3个月的随访中,相当一部分最初性腺正常的男性显示出tT提示TD。这些人有较低的电视在基线和异常核型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Mens Health
World Journal of Mens Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.10%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Expression Rates of Sex Hormone Receptors with Their Clinical Correlates in Gastric Cancer Patients and Normal Controls. The Role of Environmental Endocrine Disruptors on Leydig Cell Death and Senescen. Prostate Cancer and Suicide Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sex Differences in Clinical Features and Survival Outcomes of Esophageal Cancer: A Comparative Study in the Korean Population. Genetic Testing for Monogenic Forms of Male Infertility Contributes to the Clinical Diagnosis of Men with Severe Idiopathic Male Infertility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1