Constraint-Pareto Dominance and Diversity Enhancement Strategy-Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Solving Constrained Multiobjective Optimization Problems

IF 11.7 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1109/TEVC.2024.3525153
Zhe Liu;Fei Han;Qinghua Ling;Henry Han;Jing Jiang
{"title":"Constraint-Pareto Dominance and Diversity Enhancement Strategy-Based Evolutionary Algorithm for Solving Constrained Multiobjective Optimization Problems","authors":"Zhe Liu;Fei Han;Qinghua Ling;Henry Han;Jing Jiang","doi":"10.1109/TEVC.2024.3525153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The utilization of both constrained and unconstrained-based optimization for solving constrained multiobjective optimization problems (CMOPs) has become prevalent among recently proposed constrained multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (CMOEAs). However, the constrained-based optimization which adopted by many CMOEAs typically gives priority to feasible solutions over infeasible ones regardless of their objective values, potentially leading to degraded performance due to the elimination of promising infeasible solutions with strong convergence and diversity. Furthermore, many existing CMOEAs have difficulty in maintaining diversity while focusing on feasibility, thereby hindering their ability to effectively address CMOPs characterized by complex feasible regions. To tackle these challenges, a constraint-Pareto dominance relationship is proposed in this article to evaluate solutions based on both objectives and feasibility, to improve the optimization potential by reduce the elimination probability of promising infeasible solutions. A diversity enhancement strategy is also designed to enable simultaneously focus on both diversity and feasibility, thus effectively ensuring the diversity of the feasible solutions obtained. Empirical results from benchmark suites and real-world problems demonstrate that our proposed algorithm surpasses state-of-the-art CMOEAs.","PeriodicalId":13206,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation","volume":"29 6","pages":"2771-2784"},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10820117/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The utilization of both constrained and unconstrained-based optimization for solving constrained multiobjective optimization problems (CMOPs) has become prevalent among recently proposed constrained multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (CMOEAs). However, the constrained-based optimization which adopted by many CMOEAs typically gives priority to feasible solutions over infeasible ones regardless of their objective values, potentially leading to degraded performance due to the elimination of promising infeasible solutions with strong convergence and diversity. Furthermore, many existing CMOEAs have difficulty in maintaining diversity while focusing on feasibility, thereby hindering their ability to effectively address CMOPs characterized by complex feasible regions. To tackle these challenges, a constraint-Pareto dominance relationship is proposed in this article to evaluate solutions based on both objectives and feasibility, to improve the optimization potential by reduce the elimination probability of promising infeasible solutions. A diversity enhancement strategy is also designed to enable simultaneously focus on both diversity and feasibility, thus effectively ensuring the diversity of the feasible solutions obtained. Empirical results from benchmark suites and real-world problems demonstrate that our proposed algorithm surpasses state-of-the-art CMOEAs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于约束- pareto优势和多样性增强策略的约束多目标优化问题的进化算法
在近年提出的约束多目标进化算法(cmoea)中,利用约束优化和无约束优化来求解约束多目标优化问题已成为一种流行的方法。然而,许多cmoea采用的基于约束的优化通常会优先考虑可行解而不是不可行解,而不考虑其目标值,这可能会导致性能下降,因为消除了具有强收敛性和多样性的有希望的不可行解。此外,许多现有的cmoea在关注可行性的同时难以保持多样性,从而阻碍了它们有效解决以复杂可行区域为特征的cmoea的能力。为了解决这些问题,本文提出了约束-帕累托优势关系来评估基于目标和可行性的解决方案,通过降低有希望的不可行解决方案的消除概率来提高优化潜力。设计了多样性增强策略,使多样性和可行性兼顾,有效保证了得到的可行方案的多样性。来自基准套件和现实世界问题的实证结果表明,我们提出的算法优于最先进的cmoea。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
21.90
自引率
9.80%
发文量
196
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation is published by the IEEE Computational Intelligence Society on behalf of 13 societies: Circuits and Systems; Computer; Control Systems; Engineering in Medicine and Biology; Industrial Electronics; Industry Applications; Lasers and Electro-Optics; Oceanic Engineering; Power Engineering; Robotics and Automation; Signal Processing; Social Implications of Technology; and Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. The journal publishes original papers in evolutionary computation and related areas such as nature-inspired algorithms, population-based methods, optimization, and hybrid systems. It welcomes both purely theoretical papers and application papers that provide general insights into these areas of computation.
期刊最新文献
Feshdock: A Divide-and-Conquer Protein–Protein Complex Conformation Prediction Algorithm Evolutionary Streaming Feature Selection via Incremental Feature Clustering Differential Evolution Algorithm Based on Spatial Partition Perturbation Mechanism Evolutionary Generative Optimization: Towards Fully Data-Driven Evolutionary Optimization via Generative Learning Enabling Population-Level Parallelism in Tree-Based Genetic Programming for GPU Acceleration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1