Crafting the perfect policy combination: Exploring the synergistic effects of dual-pilot energy policies on urban carbon emission efficiency

IF 6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Urban Climate Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1016/j.uclim.2024.102260
Benhong Peng, Fei Gao
{"title":"Crafting the perfect policy combination: Exploring the synergistic effects of dual-pilot energy policies on urban carbon emission efficiency","authors":"Benhong Peng, Fei Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.uclim.2024.102260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Energy policy constitutes a critical instrument for environmental governance. Exploring the synergistic effects of government-led and market-incentivized energy policies, focusing on energy transition, is crucial for improving urban carbon emission efficiency. Based on panel data from 279 China's cities from 2006 to 2021, this study treats the dual-pilot policies of new energy demonstration city and energy-consuming rights trading system as a quasi-natural experiment, employing a Difference-in-Differences (DID) model to assess the policy effects of the dual-pilot energy policies (DPEPs) on urban carbon emission efficiency. The results show that DPEPs significantly enhance urban carbon emission efficiency, and compared to the single-pilot policy, DPEPs exhibit a more pronounced policy effect. These findings hold robust after multiple robustness checks. Mechanism analysis reveals that DPEPs improve urban carbon emission efficiency by optimizing industrial structure, enhancing energy efficiency, and promoting regional technological advancement. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the synergistic effect of DPEPs is related to geographical location, industrialization and economic level, with policy effects being more pronounced in cities located in the central and western regions and highly industrialized and economic development cities. In further analysis, this paper employs the spatial DID model to evaluate the spatial spillover effects of DPEPs, finding that the implementation of DPEPs significantly boosts the carbon emission efficiency of surrounding areas. This study has important implications for pilot cities integrating multiple energy policy combinations and accelerating urban low-carbon transformation.","PeriodicalId":48626,"journal":{"name":"Urban Climate","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Climate","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2024.102260","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy policy constitutes a critical instrument for environmental governance. Exploring the synergistic effects of government-led and market-incentivized energy policies, focusing on energy transition, is crucial for improving urban carbon emission efficiency. Based on panel data from 279 China's cities from 2006 to 2021, this study treats the dual-pilot policies of new energy demonstration city and energy-consuming rights trading system as a quasi-natural experiment, employing a Difference-in-Differences (DID) model to assess the policy effects of the dual-pilot energy policies (DPEPs) on urban carbon emission efficiency. The results show that DPEPs significantly enhance urban carbon emission efficiency, and compared to the single-pilot policy, DPEPs exhibit a more pronounced policy effect. These findings hold robust after multiple robustness checks. Mechanism analysis reveals that DPEPs improve urban carbon emission efficiency by optimizing industrial structure, enhancing energy efficiency, and promoting regional technological advancement. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the synergistic effect of DPEPs is related to geographical location, industrialization and economic level, with policy effects being more pronounced in cities located in the central and western regions and highly industrialized and economic development cities. In further analysis, this paper employs the spatial DID model to evaluate the spatial spillover effects of DPEPs, finding that the implementation of DPEPs significantly boosts the carbon emission efficiency of surrounding areas. This study has important implications for pilot cities integrating multiple energy policy combinations and accelerating urban low-carbon transformation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Climate
Urban Climate Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: Urban Climate serves the scientific and decision making communities with the publication of research on theory, science and applications relevant to understanding urban climatic conditions and change in relation to their geography and to demographic, socioeconomic, institutional, technological and environmental dynamics and global change. Targeted towards both disciplinary and interdisciplinary audiences, this journal publishes original research papers, comprehensive review articles, book reviews, and short communications on topics including, but not limited to, the following: Urban meteorology and climate[...] Urban environmental pollution[...] Adaptation to global change[...] Urban economic and social issues[...] Research Approaches[...]
期刊最新文献
Study on the efficiency evolution of carbon emissions and factors affecting them in 143 countries worldwide Disaster losses in Shanghai decreased under rapid urbanization: Evidence from 1980 to 2019 Crafting the perfect policy combination: Exploring the synergistic effects of dual-pilot energy policies on urban carbon emission efficiency Comparing aerosol sources in a metallurgy city: Evidence from low molecular weight organic acids in PM2.5 between 2012–2013 and 2021–2022 Employing the spray system to improve the regional thermal environment in outdoor open space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1