Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy management: a systematic review of the clinical practice guidelines and recommendations.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae117
Mihir M Sanghvi, Eamon Dhall, C Anwar A Chahal, Constantinos O'Mahony, Saidi A Mohiddin, Konstantinos Savvatis, Fabrizio Ricci, Patricia B Munroe, Steffen E Petersen, Nay Aung, Mohammed Y Khanji
{"title":"Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy management: a systematic review of the clinical practice guidelines and recommendations.","authors":"Mihir M Sanghvi, Eamon Dhall, C Anwar A Chahal, Constantinos O'Mahony, Saidi A Mohiddin, Konstantinos Savvatis, Fabrizio Ricci, Patricia B Munroe, Steffen E Petersen, Nay Aung, Mohammed Y Khanji","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In light of recent advances in imaging techniques, molecular understanding and therapeutic options in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), we performed a systematic review of current guidelines for the diagnosis and management of HCM in order to identify consensus and discrepant areas in the clinical practice guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We systematically reviewed the English language guidelines and recommendations for the management of HCM in adults. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for guidelines published in the last 10 years. Following a systematic search, three guidelines on the diagnosis and management of HCM were identified, all of which were robustly developed (AGREE rigour of development score ≥50%). These guidelines were authored by the major European (ESC; 2023), American (AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR; 2024) and Japanese (JCS/JHFS; 2018) cardiovascular societies. There was broad consensus on echocardiographic recommendations, the medical and invasive management of HCM, the application of genetic testing and family screening, and exercise and reproductive recommendations in HCM. There were areas of variability in the definition and diagnostic criteria for HCM, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging recommendations and assessment of sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk and prevention strategies. Due to the JCS/JHFS guideline being older, there are no recommendations on the use of cardiac myosin ATPase inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Contemporary guidelines for HCM achieve consensus across a broad range of criteria and recommendations concerning diagnosis and management. However, variations in the approach towards risk assessment for SCD exist between the guidelines. There are also more subtle differences concerning diagnostic criteria and the utility of late gadolinium enhancement for risk stratification, which will likely evolve as the evidence-base broadens.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: In light of recent advances in imaging techniques, molecular understanding and therapeutic options in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), we performed a systematic review of current guidelines for the diagnosis and management of HCM in order to identify consensus and discrepant areas in the clinical practice guidelines.

Methods and results: We systematically reviewed the English language guidelines and recommendations for the management of HCM in adults. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for guidelines published in the last 10 years. Following a systematic search, three guidelines on the diagnosis and management of HCM were identified, all of which were robustly developed (AGREE rigour of development score ≥50%). These guidelines were authored by the major European (ESC; 2023), American (AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR; 2024) and Japanese (JCS/JHFS; 2018) cardiovascular societies. There was broad consensus on echocardiographic recommendations, the medical and invasive management of HCM, the application of genetic testing and family screening, and exercise and reproductive recommendations in HCM. There were areas of variability in the definition and diagnostic criteria for HCM, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging recommendations and assessment of sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk and prevention strategies. Due to the JCS/JHFS guideline being older, there are no recommendations on the use of cardiac myosin ATPase inhibitors.

Conclusion: Contemporary guidelines for HCM achieve consensus across a broad range of criteria and recommendations concerning diagnosis and management. However, variations in the approach towards risk assessment for SCD exist between the guidelines. There are also more subtle differences concerning diagnostic criteria and the utility of late gadolinium enhancement for risk stratification, which will likely evolve as the evidence-base broadens.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肥厚性心肌病的管理:临床实践指南和建议的系统回顾。
目的:鉴于肥厚性心肌病(HCM)在成像技术、分子认识和治疗选择方面的最新进展,我们对当前HCM的诊断和治疗指南进行了系统回顾,以确定临床实践指南中的共识和差异。方法和结果:我们系统地回顾了成人HCM管理的英文指南和建议。在MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库中检索了最近10年发表的指南。经过系统搜索,确定了HCM诊断和管理的三个指南,所有这些指南都得到了强有力的制定(发展严格度评分≥50%)。这些指导方针是由主要的欧洲(ESC;2023),美国(AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR;2024)和日本(JCS/JHFS;2018)心血管学会。超声心动图建议、HCM的医学和侵入性治疗、基因检测和家庭筛查的应用以及HCM的运动和生殖建议得到了广泛的共识。在HCM的定义和诊断标准、心血管磁共振(CMR)成像建议以及心源性猝死(SCD)风险评估和预防策略方面存在差异。由于JCS/JHFS指南较旧,没有关于使用心肌肌球蛋白atp酶抑制剂的建议。结论:HCM的当代指南在诊断和管理方面达成了广泛的标准和建议的共识。然而,不同的指南在评估SCD风险的方法上存在差异。在诊断标准和晚期钆增强对风险分层的应用方面也存在更细微的差异,这可能会随着证据基础的扩大而发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.
期刊最新文献
Specialist services for cardiomyopathy: quality care requires diagnostic accuracy. Inclusion and reporting by age, sex, and ethnicity in clinical studies of high-risk medical devices approved in the European Union. Frequency of misdiagnosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. An early accumulation of serum uric acid confers more risk of heart failure: a 10-year prospective cohort study. Prognostic value of weight loss in hospitalized patients with heart failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1