Intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute dizziness or imbalance and suspected ischemic stroke-systematic review.

Abstract

Background: Correct identification of those patients presenting with an acute vestibular syndrome (AVS) or an acute imbalance syndrome (AIS) that have underlying posterior-circulation stroke (PCS) and thus may benefit from revascularization (intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), endovascular therapy (EVT)) is important. Treatment guidelines for AVS/AIS patients are lacking. We reviewed the evidence on acute treatment strategies in AVS/AIS focusing on predictors for IVT/EVT and outcome.

Methods: We performed a systematic search (MEDLINE, Embase) to identify studies reporting on acute treatment in PCS presenting as AVS/AIS (PROSPERO-registration = CRD42024537272). Key parameters were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed (Downs-and-Black quality assessment checklist).

Results: We identified 3883 citations and included seven study cohorts (n = 1000 patients including 950 ischemic strokes). Overall, 251/1000 patients (25.1%) received IVT; EVT was performed in 46/368 (12.5%). Acute vertigo/dizziness was reported in 295/1000 (29.5%) patients. AVS criteria were met in 186/407 (45.7%) patients evaluated, and AIS criteria in 82/346 (23.7%). IVT was reported in 71/195 (36.4%) AVS/AIS patients and EVT in 13/77 (16.9%) cases, whereas the door-to-needle time (DNT) was significantly longer for PCS compared to anterior-circulation stroke (90 ± 29min vs. 74 ± 30min, p = 0.003) in one study. DNT was similar in those patients presenting with AVS/AIS compared to all PCS presentations in another study (70 ± 39min (AVS/AIS) vs. 63 ± 35min (all)). An mRS $\le$ 2 after 90 days was noted in 68.4-69.6% of PCS. No outcome data were identified for AVS/AIS patients.

Conclusions: Insufficient data exist to drive any firm recommendation about treating otherwise eligible patients with AVS/AIS with IVT/EVT and judgments must be made on a case-by-case basis. Further research on this specific patient group is needed.