The True Appearance Behind Satisfaction in Young Women: A Study Using Stereophotogrammetry and FACE-Q.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000011047
Lilian Mendes Andrade, Anna Luísa Alves Fernandes, Laís Valencise Magri, Jardel Francisco Mazzi-Chaves, Paulo Batista de Vasconcelos, Selma Siéssere, Simone Cecilio Hallak Regalo, Marcelo Palinkas
{"title":"The True Appearance Behind Satisfaction in Young Women: A Study Using Stereophotogrammetry and FACE-Q.","authors":"Lilian Mendes Andrade, Anna Luísa Alves Fernandes, Laís Valencise Magri, Jardel Francisco Mazzi-Chaves, Paulo Batista de Vasconcelos, Selma Siéssere, Simone Cecilio Hallak Regalo, Marcelo Palinkas","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cross-sectional observational study aimed to investigate the relationship between satisfaction with facial appearance among young women, as measured by the FACE-Q tool, and facial asymmetry quantified through stereophotogrammetry. A total of 50 women aged 18 to 30 years with a normal body mass index were recruited for the study. Participants were categorized as either symmetrical or asymmetrical based on facial asymmetry assessments obtained through clinical examination and stereophotogrammetry using the Vectra M3 system. Facial asymmetry was quantified using root mean square (RMS) distances, with participants classified into symmetrical (RMS ≤0.68) and asymmetrical (RMS >0.68) groups. The statistical analysis included the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess the repeatability of RMS measurements (ICC=0.945), Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (area under the curve=0.900), and independent t tests to compare FACE-Q scores between groups. Results showed no significant differences in FACE-Q satisfaction scores between the symmetrical and asymmetrical groups. In addition, simple linear regression analysis indicated that RMS values were not predictive of FACE-Q scores, suggesting that facial asymmetry, as measured in this study, did not have a direct effect on self-reported satisfaction with appearance. These findings highlight the nuanced nature of individual satisfaction with facial appearance, suggesting that health care providers should combine clinical evaluation with empathetic communication to address both the aesthetic and functional concerns of patients more effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This cross-sectional observational study aimed to investigate the relationship between satisfaction with facial appearance among young women, as measured by the FACE-Q tool, and facial asymmetry quantified through stereophotogrammetry. A total of 50 women aged 18 to 30 years with a normal body mass index were recruited for the study. Participants were categorized as either symmetrical or asymmetrical based on facial asymmetry assessments obtained through clinical examination and stereophotogrammetry using the Vectra M3 system. Facial asymmetry was quantified using root mean square (RMS) distances, with participants classified into symmetrical (RMS ≤0.68) and asymmetrical (RMS >0.68) groups. The statistical analysis included the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess the repeatability of RMS measurements (ICC=0.945), Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (area under the curve=0.900), and independent t tests to compare FACE-Q scores between groups. Results showed no significant differences in FACE-Q satisfaction scores between the symmetrical and asymmetrical groups. In addition, simple linear regression analysis indicated that RMS values were not predictive of FACE-Q scores, suggesting that facial asymmetry, as measured in this study, did not have a direct effect on self-reported satisfaction with appearance. These findings highlight the nuanced nature of individual satisfaction with facial appearance, suggesting that health care providers should combine clinical evaluation with empathetic communication to address both the aesthetic and functional concerns of patients more effectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Reference Strategy for the Selection of Surgical Treatment for Nonsyndromic Sagittal Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Education on the Importance of Doctor-patient Communication in Orthodontic Clinical Teaching. Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy in Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction With and Without Dacryocystitis: A Comparative Study. Using Transorbital Sonography for Assessing Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients With Periorbital Hematoma. TMJ Metastasis: Evaluation of 3 Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1