The True Appearance Behind Satisfaction in Young Women: A Study Using Stereophotogrammetry and FACE-Q.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000011047
Lilian Mendes Andrade, Anna Luísa Alves Fernandes, Laís Valencise Magri, Jardel Francisco Mazzi-Chaves, Paulo Batista de Vasconcelos, Selma Siéssere, Simone Cecilio Hallak Regalo, Marcelo Palinkas
{"title":"The True Appearance Behind Satisfaction in Young Women: A Study Using Stereophotogrammetry and FACE-Q.","authors":"Lilian Mendes Andrade, Anna Luísa Alves Fernandes, Laís Valencise Magri, Jardel Francisco Mazzi-Chaves, Paulo Batista de Vasconcelos, Selma Siéssere, Simone Cecilio Hallak Regalo, Marcelo Palinkas","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000011047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cross-sectional observational study aimed to investigate the relationship between satisfaction with facial appearance among young women, as measured by the FACE-Q tool, and facial asymmetry quantified through stereophotogrammetry. A total of 50 women aged 18 to 30 years with a normal body mass index were recruited for the study. Participants were categorized as either symmetrical or asymmetrical based on facial asymmetry assessments obtained through clinical examination and stereophotogrammetry using the Vectra M3 system. Facial asymmetry was quantified using root mean square (RMS) distances, with participants classified into symmetrical (RMS ≤0.68) and asymmetrical (RMS >0.68) groups. The statistical analysis included the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess the repeatability of RMS measurements (ICC=0.945), Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (area under the curve=0.900), and independent t tests to compare FACE-Q scores between groups. Results showed no significant differences in FACE-Q satisfaction scores between the symmetrical and asymmetrical groups. In addition, simple linear regression analysis indicated that RMS values were not predictive of FACE-Q scores, suggesting that facial asymmetry, as measured in this study, did not have a direct effect on self-reported satisfaction with appearance. These findings highlight the nuanced nature of individual satisfaction with facial appearance, suggesting that health care providers should combine clinical evaluation with empathetic communication to address both the aesthetic and functional concerns of patients more effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"643-646"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000011047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This cross-sectional observational study aimed to investigate the relationship between satisfaction with facial appearance among young women, as measured by the FACE-Q tool, and facial asymmetry quantified through stereophotogrammetry. A total of 50 women aged 18 to 30 years with a normal body mass index were recruited for the study. Participants were categorized as either symmetrical or asymmetrical based on facial asymmetry assessments obtained through clinical examination and stereophotogrammetry using the Vectra M3 system. Facial asymmetry was quantified using root mean square (RMS) distances, with participants classified into symmetrical (RMS ≤0.68) and asymmetrical (RMS >0.68) groups. The statistical analysis included the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess the repeatability of RMS measurements (ICC=0.945), Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (area under the curve=0.900), and independent t tests to compare FACE-Q scores between groups. Results showed no significant differences in FACE-Q satisfaction scores between the symmetrical and asymmetrical groups. In addition, simple linear regression analysis indicated that RMS values were not predictive of FACE-Q scores, suggesting that facial asymmetry, as measured in this study, did not have a direct effect on self-reported satisfaction with appearance. These findings highlight the nuanced nature of individual satisfaction with facial appearance, suggesting that health care providers should combine clinical evaluation with empathetic communication to address both the aesthetic and functional concerns of patients more effectively.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
年轻女性满意度背后的真实外表:一项使用立体摄影测量和FACE-Q的研究。
这项横断面观察性研究旨在探讨年轻女性对面部外观的满意度(通过FACE-Q工具测量)与通过立体摄影测量量化的面部不对称之间的关系。该研究共招募了50名年龄在18至30岁之间、体重指数正常的女性。根据临床检查和使用Vectra M3系统的立体摄影测量获得的面部不对称评估,将参与者分为对称或不对称两组。采用均方根(RMS)距离对面部不对称进行量化,将参与者分为对称组(RMS≤0.68)和不对称组(RMS≤0.68)。统计分析包括用类内相关系数(ICC)评价RMS测量结果的重复性(ICC=0.945),用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析(曲线下面积=0.900),用独立t检验比较组间FACE-Q评分。结果显示,对称组和不对称组在FACE-Q满意度得分上无显著差异。此外,简单的线性回归分析表明,RMS值不能预测FACE-Q分数,这表明本研究中测量的面部不对称对自我报告的外观满意度没有直接影响。这些发现强调了个体对面部外观满意度的细微差别,表明医疗保健提供者应该将临床评估与移情沟通结合起来,更有效地解决患者的审美和功能问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
期刊最新文献
In Memory of John Mulliken: Caretaker of Patients and Educator of All. Clinical and Quantitative Radiologic Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Candidates: Implications for Surgical Planning. The Effects of Palatal Expansion on Speech Articulation in Children With Unilateral Versus Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Full-arch Rehabilitation After Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using a Subperiosteal Tunneling Approach. Mandible Fracture Fixation Adverse Outcomes Higher For Patients With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Even if on Antiretroviral Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1