Barriers and facilitators to the implementation and adoption of computerised clinical decision support systems: an umbrella review protocol.

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1186/s13643-024-02745-4
Anna Katharina Böhm-Hustede, Johanna Sophie Lubasch, Anna Thalea Hoogestraat, Eike Buhr, Antje Wulff
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators to the implementation and adoption of computerised clinical decision support systems: an umbrella review protocol.","authors":"Anna Katharina Böhm-Hustede, Johanna Sophie Lubasch, Anna Thalea Hoogestraat, Eike Buhr, Antje Wulff","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02745-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The implementation of computerised clinical decision support systems has the potential to enhance healthcare by improving patient safety, practitioner performance, and patient outcomes. Notwithstanding the numerous advantages, the uptake of clinical decision support systems remains constrained, thereby impeding the full realisation of their potential. To ensure the effective and successful implementation of these systems, it is essential to identify and analyse the reasons for their low uptake and adoption. This protocol outlines an umbrella review, which will synthesise the findings of existing literature reviews to generate a comprehensive overview of the barriers and facilitators to the implementation and adoption of decision support systems across healthcare settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This umbrella review protocol was developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. Searches for eligible articles will be conducted in four electronic bibliographic databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, and Web of Science. Obtained results will be independently screened by four reviewers based on pre-defined eligibility criteria. The risk of bias will be assessed for all eligible articles. Data on barriers and facilitators to the implementation and adoption of clinical decision support systems will be extracted, summarised, and further categorised into themes that aim to describe the originating environment or concept of the respective factor. The frequency of all identified barriers and facilitators within the group of included reviews will be determined in order to establish a prioritisation of the factors.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This umbrella review protocol presents a methodology for the systematic synthesis of barriers and facilitators to the implementation and adoption of clinical decision support systems across healthcare settings. The umbrella review will enable the development of novel implementation and adoption strategies that reinforce the identified facilitators and circumvent barriers, thereby promoting the use-oriented evaluation and effective utilisation of clinical decision support systems.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42024507614.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11697958/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02745-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The implementation of computerised clinical decision support systems has the potential to enhance healthcare by improving patient safety, practitioner performance, and patient outcomes. Notwithstanding the numerous advantages, the uptake of clinical decision support systems remains constrained, thereby impeding the full realisation of their potential. To ensure the effective and successful implementation of these systems, it is essential to identify and analyse the reasons for their low uptake and adoption. This protocol outlines an umbrella review, which will synthesise the findings of existing literature reviews to generate a comprehensive overview of the barriers and facilitators to the implementation and adoption of decision support systems across healthcare settings.

Methods: This umbrella review protocol was developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. Searches for eligible articles will be conducted in four electronic bibliographic databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, and Web of Science. Obtained results will be independently screened by four reviewers based on pre-defined eligibility criteria. The risk of bias will be assessed for all eligible articles. Data on barriers and facilitators to the implementation and adoption of clinical decision support systems will be extracted, summarised, and further categorised into themes that aim to describe the originating environment or concept of the respective factor. The frequency of all identified barriers and facilitators within the group of included reviews will be determined in order to establish a prioritisation of the factors.

Discussion: This umbrella review protocol presents a methodology for the systematic synthesis of barriers and facilitators to the implementation and adoption of clinical decision support systems across healthcare settings. The umbrella review will enable the development of novel implementation and adoption strategies that reinforce the identified facilitators and circumvent barriers, thereby promoting the use-oriented evaluation and effective utilisation of clinical decision support systems.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024507614.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施和采用计算机化临床决策支持系统的障碍和促进因素:一个总括性审查方案。
背景:计算机化临床决策支持系统的实施有可能通过改善患者安全、医生表现和患者预后来加强医疗保健。尽管有许多优点,临床决策支持系统的采用仍然受到限制,从而阻碍了其潜力的充分实现。为了确保有效和成功地实施这些系统,必须查明和分析其吸收和采用程度低的原因。本协议概述了一个总括性的综述,它将综合现有文献综述的发现,以产生一个全面的障碍和促进因素,在整个医疗保健环境中实施和采用决策支持系统。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)指南制定了该综合评价方案。搜索符合条件的文章将在四个电子书目数据库中进行,包括PubMed/MEDLINE, IEEE Xplore, Scopus和Web of Science。获得的结果将由四名评审人员根据预先定义的资格标准独立筛选。将对所有符合条件的文章进行偏倚风险评估。关于实施和采用临床决策支持系统的障碍和促进因素的数据将被提取、总结,并进一步分类为旨在描述各自因素的原始环境或概念的主题。将确定在所包括的审查组中所有确定的障碍和促进因素的频率,以便确定因素的优先次序。讨论:这个总括性审查方案提出了一种方法,用于系统地综合障碍和促进跨医疗机构实施和采用临床决策支持系统。总体审查将有助于制定新的实施和采用战略,以加强已确定的促进因素并规避障碍,从而促进以使用为导向的评估和有效利用临床决策支持系统。系统评价注册:PROSPERO CRD42024507614。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids for stroke and traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultra-processed foods and risk of all-cause mortality: an updated systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Using virtual patients to enhance empathy in medical students: a scoping review protocol. Research priority setting for implementation science and practice: a living systematic review protocol. Self-care interventions among women with gestational diabetes mellitus in low and middle-income countries: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1