Interprofessional collaborative practice in health and social care for people living with multimorbidity: a scoping review protocol.

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1186/s13643-024-02730-x
Josephine-L K Murray, Virginia Hernandez-Santiago, Frank Sullivan, Joanna Hornal, Farhana Badshah, Ben Keatley, Jillian Galbraith, Pam Channer, Anne Fearfull, Anne Haddow, Eleanor Johnston, Maureen Ward, Veronica O'Carroll
{"title":"Interprofessional collaborative practice in health and social care for people living with multimorbidity: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Josephine-L K Murray, Virginia Hernandez-Santiago, Frank Sullivan, Joanna Hornal, Farhana Badshah, Ben Keatley, Jillian Galbraith, Pam Channer, Anne Fearfull, Anne Haddow, Eleanor Johnston, Maureen Ward, Veronica O'Carroll","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02730-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multimorbidity, the co-existence of two or more conditions within an individual at any one time, is globally increasing and forecasted to rise. This poses a significant challenge for current models of healthcare delivery, which are now ill-equipped to meet the future population health needs. Interprofessional collaborative practice is a specific way professionals work closely together and with patients and their families to improve patient outcomes. Evidence suggests it can improve outcomes for people living with a single condition. What remains unknown is if interprofessional collaborative practice has been used to improve the outcomes of people living with multimorbidity, and if so, to what extent?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review is proposed to identify prior peer-reviewed research and grey literature related to interprofessional collaborative practice for multimorbidity in health and social care settings. A search strategy will identify primary, peer-reviewed research and grey literature. An initial limited search will be conducted to identify relevant existing systematic reviews. Their methods will be examined and their search terms scrutinised. A second comprehensive search will be used to interrogate four databases, looking back 10 years, seeking articles published in English, French, Spanish or Portuguese. Hand searching will be performed on all included full-text articles for any articles missing from the two steps above. Critical data will be extracted by adapting existing data abstraction forms based on the needs of the research objectives. These forms will be piloted before use. The results will be analysed descriptively. If appropriate, qualitative content analysis may be undertaken. Where sufficient numbers of homogeneous interventions exist, meta-analysis techniques will be applied. Results will be presented in tabular, graphic, and diagrammatic information displays.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This scoping review will provide an overview of the current evidence base of interprofessional collaborative practice used internationally for people living with multimorbidity in health and social care settings. These findings will provide valuable information to improve health and social care practice as well as change systems and policy to meet the population need of multimorbidity.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>The protocol was submitted to Open Science Framework on 19 December 2023 and registered on OSF Registries. Registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/UXHG3 .</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11697734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02730-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multimorbidity, the co-existence of two or more conditions within an individual at any one time, is globally increasing and forecasted to rise. This poses a significant challenge for current models of healthcare delivery, which are now ill-equipped to meet the future population health needs. Interprofessional collaborative practice is a specific way professionals work closely together and with patients and their families to improve patient outcomes. Evidence suggests it can improve outcomes for people living with a single condition. What remains unknown is if interprofessional collaborative practice has been used to improve the outcomes of people living with multimorbidity, and if so, to what extent?

Methods: A scoping review is proposed to identify prior peer-reviewed research and grey literature related to interprofessional collaborative practice for multimorbidity in health and social care settings. A search strategy will identify primary, peer-reviewed research and grey literature. An initial limited search will be conducted to identify relevant existing systematic reviews. Their methods will be examined and their search terms scrutinised. A second comprehensive search will be used to interrogate four databases, looking back 10 years, seeking articles published in English, French, Spanish or Portuguese. Hand searching will be performed on all included full-text articles for any articles missing from the two steps above. Critical data will be extracted by adapting existing data abstraction forms based on the needs of the research objectives. These forms will be piloted before use. The results will be analysed descriptively. If appropriate, qualitative content analysis may be undertaken. Where sufficient numbers of homogeneous interventions exist, meta-analysis techniques will be applied. Results will be presented in tabular, graphic, and diagrammatic information displays.

Discussion: This scoping review will provide an overview of the current evidence base of interprofessional collaborative practice used internationally for people living with multimorbidity in health and social care settings. These findings will provide valuable information to improve health and social care practice as well as change systems and policy to meet the population need of multimorbidity.

Systematic review registration: The protocol was submitted to Open Science Framework on 19 December 2023 and registered on OSF Registries. Registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/UXHG3 .

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多病患者卫生和社会保健的跨专业协作实践:范围审查方案。
背景:多重发病,即个体在任何时间内同时存在两种或两种以上的疾病,正在全球范围内增加,并预计会增加。这对目前的医疗保健提供模式构成了重大挑战,这些模式目前无法满足未来的人口健康需求。跨专业合作实践是专业人员与患者及其家属密切合作以改善患者预后的一种特定方式。有证据表明,它可以改善患有单一疾病的人的预后。目前尚不清楚的是,跨专业的合作实践是否被用于改善多重疾病患者的预后,如果是,在多大程度上?方法:提出一项范围综述,以确定先前同行评议的研究和灰色文献相关的跨专业合作实践在卫生和社会保健设置的多病。搜索策略将识别主要的、同行评审的研究和灰色文献。将进行初步的有限搜索,以确定相关的现有系统评价。他们的方法和搜索词都将受到审查。第二次全面搜索将用于查询四个数据库,回顾过去10年,寻找以英语、法语、西班牙语或葡萄牙语发表的文章。手动搜索将在所有包含的全文文章中执行上述两个步骤中缺失的任何文章。关键数据将根据研究目标的需要,通过调整现有的数据抽象形式来提取。这些表格将在使用前进行试用。结果将进行描述性分析。如果合适,可以进行定性内容分析。如果存在足够数量的同质干预措施,将采用元分析技术。结果将以表格、图形和图表信息显示的形式呈现。讨论:这一范围审查将概述目前国际上用于卫生和社会保健环境中患有多种疾病的人的跨专业合作实践的证据基础。这些发现将提供有价值的信息,以改善卫生和社会保健实践,并改变系统和政策,以满足多病人群的需求。系统评审注册:该方案于2023年12月19日提交给开放科学框架,并在OSF登记处注册。注册DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/UXHG3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids for stroke and traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultra-processed foods and risk of all-cause mortality: an updated systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Using virtual patients to enhance empathy in medical students: a scoping review protocol. Research priority setting for implementation science and practice: a living systematic review protocol. Self-care interventions among women with gestational diabetes mellitus in low and middle-income countries: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1