{"title":"Comparative evaluation of marginal fit accuracy of two different designs of endocrown manufactured through CAD-CAM system: An in vitro study.","authors":"Khushbu Rakesh Gupta, Deepesh Kumar Gupta, Anumeha Jha, Shivam B Shukla, Aayush Mukund Dubey","doi":"10.4103/jips.jips_207_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare the accuracy of marginal fit of CAD-CAM endocrown with two different preparation forms, i.e., endocrown with ferrule and endocrown without ferrule.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>Various studies have opined on the impact of preparation form on the marginal fit of endocrown, but studies on the effect on the marginal fit of digitally milled endocrown with and without ferrule are sparse.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Total of 30 typodont were sectioned 3 mm above the cemento-enamel junction, and central cavity was prepared to depict a severely destructed tooth. The typodonts were divided into two groups: Group 1 contained specimens for endocrown without ferrule (WoF); Group 2 contained specimens for endocrown with ferrule (WF). The typodonts were prepared based on standard preparation. The specimens were then scanned using intraoral scanner, and the stereolithography (STL) was generated. Endocrowns were designed in the Exocad software using a digital library. The STL file format is translated into millable data file format (CNC- Computer numerical control) in the inLAB MC X5 Milling machine. The marginal fit of endocrowns was then assessed in the stereomicroscope.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>The data was analysed with a digital image analyser. The result was generated using a two-way ANOVA test. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the present study, the marginal fit of WoF showed a superior marginal fit than WF. A statistically significant difference was seen in the marginal fit of two endocrowns, with a higher marginal discrepancy observed in the endocrown with the ferrule. The P value for the difference in the means of the marginal gap without and with ferrule (-13.42) is zero. Maximum marginal gap of 96 micron is observed for with ferrule (WF) design at location B. Minimum marginal gap of 29 micron is observed for without ferrule (WoF) at location D.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endocrown without a ferrule can provide a better marginal fit and can contribute to the long-term survival of restoration.</p>","PeriodicalId":22669,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","volume":"25 1","pages":"74-79"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_207_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: To compare the accuracy of marginal fit of CAD-CAM endocrown with two different preparation forms, i.e., endocrown with ferrule and endocrown without ferrule.
Settings and design: Various studies have opined on the impact of preparation form on the marginal fit of endocrown, but studies on the effect on the marginal fit of digitally milled endocrown with and without ferrule are sparse.
Materials and methods: Total of 30 typodont were sectioned 3 mm above the cemento-enamel junction, and central cavity was prepared to depict a severely destructed tooth. The typodonts were divided into two groups: Group 1 contained specimens for endocrown without ferrule (WoF); Group 2 contained specimens for endocrown with ferrule (WF). The typodonts were prepared based on standard preparation. The specimens were then scanned using intraoral scanner, and the stereolithography (STL) was generated. Endocrowns were designed in the Exocad software using a digital library. The STL file format is translated into millable data file format (CNC- Computer numerical control) in the inLAB MC X5 Milling machine. The marginal fit of endocrowns was then assessed in the stereomicroscope.
Statistical analysis: The data was analysed with a digital image analyser. The result was generated using a two-way ANOVA test. The significance level was set at P ≤ 0.05.
Results: In the present study, the marginal fit of WoF showed a superior marginal fit than WF. A statistically significant difference was seen in the marginal fit of two endocrowns, with a higher marginal discrepancy observed in the endocrown with the ferrule. The P value for the difference in the means of the marginal gap without and with ferrule (-13.42) is zero. Maximum marginal gap of 96 micron is observed for with ferrule (WF) design at location B. Minimum marginal gap of 29 micron is observed for without ferrule (WoF) at location D.
Conclusions: Endocrown without a ferrule can provide a better marginal fit and can contribute to the long-term survival of restoration.
目的:比较CAD-CAM内冠带卡箍和不带卡箍两种不同制备形式的边缘配合精度。设置与设计:关于预备形式对内冠边缘配合的影响已有多种研究,但关于带卡圈和不带卡圈的数字铣削内冠对其边缘配合影响的研究较少。材料和方法:在牙髓-牙釉质交界处上方3mm处切出30个印型,并准备中央空腔来描绘严重受损的牙齿。分两组:第1组为内冠无卡套(endocrown without ferrule)标本;第2组为带箍内冠标本(endocrown with ferrule, WF)。排字是在标准准备的基础上准备的。然后使用口内扫描仪对标本进行扫描,并生成立体光刻(STL)。在Exocad软件中使用数字图书馆设计牙冠。在inLAB MC X5铣床中将STL文件格式转换为可铣削数据文件格式(CNC-计算机数控)。然后在体视显微镜下评估内冠的边缘贴合。统计分析:用数字图像分析仪对数据进行分析。结果采用双向方差分析检验产生。显著性水平为P≤0.05。结果:在本研究中,WoF的边缘拟合优于WF。两种内冠的边缘配合有统计学上的显著差异,带卡箍的内冠的边缘配合差异更大。不带箍和带箍的边际间隙均值之差(-13.42)的P值为零。有卡箍(WF)设计的b位置的最大边缘间隙为96微米,无卡箍(WoF)设计的d位置的最小边缘间隙为29微米。结论:无卡箍的内冠可以提供更好的边缘配合,有助于修复的长期生存。