Limb salvage prediction in peripheral artery disease patients using angiographic computer vision.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Vascular Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1177/17085381241312467
Yury Rusinovich, Vitalii Liashko, Volha Rusinovich, Alina Shastak, Leon Bruder, Safwan Omran, Andreas Greiner, Markus Doss, Daniela Branzan
{"title":"Limb salvage prediction in peripheral artery disease patients using angiographic computer vision.","authors":"Yury Rusinovich, Vitalii Liashko, Volha Rusinovich, Alina Shastak, Leon Bruder, Safwan Omran, Andreas Greiner, Markus Doss, Daniela Branzan","doi":"10.1177/17085381241312467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripheral artery disease (PAD) outcomes often rely on the expertise of individual vascular units, introducing potential subjectivity into disease staging. This retrospective, multicenter cohort study aimed to demonstrate the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) to provide disease staging based on inter-institutional expertise by predicting limb outcomes in post-interventional pedal angiograms of PAD patients, specifically in comparison to the inframalleolar modifier in the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (IM GLASS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used computer vision (CV) based on the MobileNetV2 model, implemented via TensorFlow.js library, for transfer learning and feature extraction from 518 pedal angiograms of PAD patients with known 3-month limb outcomes: 218 salvaged limbs, 140 minor amputations, and 160 major amputations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 43 epochs of training with a learning rate of 0.001 and a batch size of 16, the model achieved a validation accuracy of 95% and a test accuracy of 93% in differentiating salvaged limbs from amputations. In manual testing with 45 angiograms excluded from the training, validation, and test processes, the AI predicted mean limb salvage probabilities of 96% for actual salvaged limbs, 27% for minor amputations, and 17% for major amputations (<i>p</i>-value < .001). The correlation coefficient between the CV model-predicted outcome and the actual outcome for these 45 angiograms was 0.7, nearly five times higher than that between the IM GLASS pattern and the actual outcome (0.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Computer vision can analyze angiograms and predict disease outcomes, demonstrating a significant correlation between predicted and actual limb salvage rates, outperforming IM GLASS segmentation by a vascular specialist. It has the potential to provide immediate and precise treatment results during vascular interventions, tailored to (inter)institutional expertise, and enhance individualized decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"17085381241312467"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381241312467","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) outcomes often rely on the expertise of individual vascular units, introducing potential subjectivity into disease staging. This retrospective, multicenter cohort study aimed to demonstrate the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) to provide disease staging based on inter-institutional expertise by predicting limb outcomes in post-interventional pedal angiograms of PAD patients, specifically in comparison to the inframalleolar modifier in the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (IM GLASS).

Methods: We used computer vision (CV) based on the MobileNetV2 model, implemented via TensorFlow.js library, for transfer learning and feature extraction from 518 pedal angiograms of PAD patients with known 3-month limb outcomes: 218 salvaged limbs, 140 minor amputations, and 160 major amputations.

Results: After 43 epochs of training with a learning rate of 0.001 and a batch size of 16, the model achieved a validation accuracy of 95% and a test accuracy of 93% in differentiating salvaged limbs from amputations. In manual testing with 45 angiograms excluded from the training, validation, and test processes, the AI predicted mean limb salvage probabilities of 96% for actual salvaged limbs, 27% for minor amputations, and 17% for major amputations (p-value < .001). The correlation coefficient between the CV model-predicted outcome and the actual outcome for these 45 angiograms was 0.7, nearly five times higher than that between the IM GLASS pattern and the actual outcome (0.14).

Conclusion: Computer vision can analyze angiograms and predict disease outcomes, demonstrating a significant correlation between predicted and actual limb salvage rates, outperforming IM GLASS segmentation by a vascular specialist. It has the potential to provide immediate and precise treatment results during vascular interventions, tailored to (inter)institutional expertise, and enhance individualized decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用血管造影计算机视觉预测外周动脉疾病患者的肢体保留。
背景:外周动脉疾病(PAD)的预后通常依赖于单个血管单位的专业知识,在疾病分期中引入了潜在的主观性。这项回顾性、多中心队列研究旨在证明人工智能(AI)能够根据机构间专业知识提供疾病分期,通过预测PAD患者介入后足部血管造影的肢体结局,特别是与全球肢体解剖分期系统(IM GLASS)中的踝下修饰因子进行比较。方法:我们使用基于MobileNetV2模型的计算机视觉(CV),通过TensorFlow.js库实现,对518例已知3个月肢体结局的PAD患者足部血管图进行迁移学习和特征提取:218例残肢,140例轻度截肢,160例重度截肢。结果:经过43次训练,学习率为0.001,batch size为16,该模型在残肢与残肢鉴别上的验证准确率为95%,测试准确率为93%。在排除训练、验证和测试过程的45张血管造影的人工测试中,人工智能预测实际保留肢体的平均肢体保留概率为96%,轻微截肢为27%,严重截肢为17% (p值< 0.001)。这45张血管造影的CV模型预测结果与实际结果的相关系数为0.7,比IM GLASS模式与实际结果的相关系数(0.14)高出近5倍。结论:计算机视觉可以分析血管图像并预测疾病结果,显示预测和实际肢体保留率之间存在显著相关性,优于由血管专家进行的IM GLASS分割。它有可能在血管干预期间提供即时和精确的治疗结果,根据(机构间)专业知识量身定制,并加强个性化决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to "Knowledge atlas analysis of virtual vascular interventional studies". Retraction Notice to "Two-year follow-up of a n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate glue ablation for the treatment of saphenous vein insufficiency with a novel application catheter with guiding light". Outcomes of drug-coated balloon angioplasty in patients with dyslipidemia in the BIOLUX P-III registry: A subgroup analysis. Comparative outcomes of surgical and conservative management in carotid artery dissection. Comparing anticoagulant therapy alone, anticoagulant therapy in combination with catheter-directed thrombolysis, and anticoagulant therapy in combination with pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis in the patients with optional inferior vena cava filter-related thrombosis: A single-center retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1