Palpebral Fissure Changes After Bilateral Recession Versus Unilateral Recession-Plication of Horizontal Rectus Muscles for Correction of Intermittent Exotropia.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.3928/01913913-20241121-01
Kareem B Elessawy, Marooj Mohamed Mahmoud Ibrahim, Rehab R Kassem, Heba M Fouad
{"title":"Palpebral Fissure Changes After Bilateral Recession Versus Unilateral Recession-Plication of Horizontal Rectus Muscles for Correction of Intermittent Exotropia.","authors":"Kareem B Elessawy, Marooj Mohamed Mahmoud Ibrahim, Rehab R Kassem, Heba M Fouad","doi":"10.3928/01913913-20241121-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare changes of vertical palpebral fissure height after bilateral lateral rectus (BLR) recessions versus unilateral lateral rectus (LR) recession and medial rectus (MR) muscle scleral plication, for treatment of intermittent exotropia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, comparative, randomized study included 40 patients with intermittent exotropia who were divided into two groups: 20 patients who underwent BLR recessions (BLR recession group) and 20 patients who underwent unilateral LR recession and MR muscle scleral plication (recession-plication group). Eyelid evaluation included measurement of margin reflex distance 1 (MRD1) and margin reflex distance 2 (MRD2) at 1 week, 6 weeks, and 3 months postoperatively. Angle of deviation and any incomitance were also recorded at each visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant statistical difference in eyelid measurements after the surgery between both groups (<i>P</i> = 1.00). There was no significant statistical difference in ocular alignment after the surgery between both groups (<i>P</i> = 1.00). Also, there was no significant statistical difference in lateral incomitance after the surgery between both groups (<i>P</i> = 1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both the unilateral recession and plication of horizontal rectus muscles technique and bilateral recession provide comparable surgical results for correction of exotropia without significant palpebral fissures changes or lateral incomitance. <b>[<i>J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus</i>. 20XX;X(X):XXX-XXX.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20241121-01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare changes of vertical palpebral fissure height after bilateral lateral rectus (BLR) recessions versus unilateral lateral rectus (LR) recession and medial rectus (MR) muscle scleral plication, for treatment of intermittent exotropia.

Methods: This prospective, comparative, randomized study included 40 patients with intermittent exotropia who were divided into two groups: 20 patients who underwent BLR recessions (BLR recession group) and 20 patients who underwent unilateral LR recession and MR muscle scleral plication (recession-plication group). Eyelid evaluation included measurement of margin reflex distance 1 (MRD1) and margin reflex distance 2 (MRD2) at 1 week, 6 weeks, and 3 months postoperatively. Angle of deviation and any incomitance were also recorded at each visit.

Results: There was no significant statistical difference in eyelid measurements after the surgery between both groups (P = 1.00). There was no significant statistical difference in ocular alignment after the surgery between both groups (P = 1.00). Also, there was no significant statistical difference in lateral incomitance after the surgery between both groups (P = 1.00).

Conclusions: Both the unilateral recession and plication of horizontal rectus muscles technique and bilateral recession provide comparable surgical results for correction of exotropia without significant palpebral fissures changes or lateral incomitance. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 20XX;X(X):XXX-XXX.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双侧收缩与单侧收缩后睑裂的变化——运用水平直肌矫正间歇性外斜视。
目的:比较双侧外侧直肌(BLR)消退后睑裂垂直高度与单侧外侧直肌(LR)消退和内侧直肌(MR)巩膜压迫治疗间歇性外斜视的变化。方法:本前瞻性、比较、随机研究纳入40例间歇性外斜视患者,分为两组:20例BLR衰退组(BLR衰退组)和20例单侧LR衰退并MR肌巩膜皱褶组(衰退-皱褶组)。眼睑评价包括术后1周、6周和3个月边缘反射距离1 (MRD1)和边缘反射距离2 (MRD2)的测量。每次访视时也记录角度偏差和任何不便。结果:两组患者术后眼睑测量值差异无统计学意义(P = 1.00)。两组术后眼线排列差异无统计学意义(P = 1.00)。两组术后侧部疼痛差异无统计学意义(P = 1.00)。结论:单侧水平直肌退行术和双侧退行术对矫正外斜视的效果相当,且无明显的睑裂改变或外侧不适。[J].儿童眼斜视,2009;X(X):XXX-XXX。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
115
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus is a bimonthly peer-reviewed publication for pediatric ophthalmologists. The Journal has published original articles on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of eye disorders in the pediatric age group and the treatment of strabismus in all age groups for over 50 years.
期刊最新文献
Changes in PAX7 Positive Satellite Cells in Extraocular Muscle After Strabismus Surgery. Long-term Motor and Sensory Outcomes After Unilateral Lateral Rectus Recession-Medial Rectus Resection for Infantile Constant Exotropia. Ophthalmic Outcomes in Children With Spina Bifida Myelomeningocele in Ireland. Capturing Bilateral Retinoblastoma. Botulinum Toxin A Augmentation of Strabismus Surgery for Large-Angle Strabismus: A Retrospective Case Series and Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1