The Replicability Crisis and Human Agency in the Neo-Structured World.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1007/s12124-024-09887-z
Pavel S Sorokin, Irina A Mironenko
{"title":"The Replicability Crisis and Human Agency in the Neo-Structured World.","authors":"Pavel S Sorokin, Irina A Mironenko","doi":"10.1007/s12124-024-09887-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The paper analyzes current discussions concerning the so called \"replicability crisis\" - a notion describing difficulties in attempts to confirm existing research findings by their additional scrutiny or by new empirical studies. We propose interpretation that this \"crisis\" may be seen as a manifestation of the increasing inconsistency between, on the one hand, the outdated views on a human being and social structures dominating in the academic mainstream across various disciplines, including psychology and sociology, and, on the other hand, the reality of the emerging new stage of societal evolution, neo-structuration, which brings to the forefront individual agency. Our analysis suggests the possibilities for the future inter-disciplinary paradigmatic shift, which implies putting in the center of research not the idea of a constant or predictably developing individual in the context of solid external structures operating in line with a presumably sustainable \"progress\". Instead, under increasing neo-structuration, individual agency becomes, simultaneously, a manifestation of the essence of human nature (as cultural psychology argues) and the driving force for societal transformations, including solving most acute social problems, in the concrete historical period. It means a fundamentally new task for social sciences and humanities: to elaborate methodological solutions and theoretical frameworks to systematically comprehend the contextually conditioned human ability to create and transform - and not only to reproduce. Addressing more attention to agency manifestations in digital environment and, in particular, to those congruent to social activism or volunteering, seems especially fruitful for comprehending human activity in the neo-structurated world.</p>","PeriodicalId":50356,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science","volume":"59 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-024-09887-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper analyzes current discussions concerning the so called "replicability crisis" - a notion describing difficulties in attempts to confirm existing research findings by their additional scrutiny or by new empirical studies. We propose interpretation that this "crisis" may be seen as a manifestation of the increasing inconsistency between, on the one hand, the outdated views on a human being and social structures dominating in the academic mainstream across various disciplines, including psychology and sociology, and, on the other hand, the reality of the emerging new stage of societal evolution, neo-structuration, which brings to the forefront individual agency. Our analysis suggests the possibilities for the future inter-disciplinary paradigmatic shift, which implies putting in the center of research not the idea of a constant or predictably developing individual in the context of solid external structures operating in line with a presumably sustainable "progress". Instead, under increasing neo-structuration, individual agency becomes, simultaneously, a manifestation of the essence of human nature (as cultural psychology argues) and the driving force for societal transformations, including solving most acute social problems, in the concrete historical period. It means a fundamentally new task for social sciences and humanities: to elaborate methodological solutions and theoretical frameworks to systematically comprehend the contextually conditioned human ability to create and transform - and not only to reproduce. Addressing more attention to agency manifestations in digital environment and, in particular, to those congruent to social activism or volunteering, seems especially fruitful for comprehending human activity in the neo-structurated world.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新结构世界中的可复制性危机与人的能动性。
本文分析了目前关于所谓的“可复制性危机”的讨论,这个概念描述了试图通过额外的审查或新的实证研究来证实现有研究结果的困难。我们提出的解释是,这种“危机”可以被看作是两方面日益不一致的表现,一方面是关于人类和社会结构的过时观点在包括心理学和社会学在内的各个学科的学术主流中占主导地位,另一方面是社会进化的新阶段,新结构的现实,它把个人机构放在了最重要的位置。我们的分析表明了未来跨学科范式转变的可能性,这意味着在坚实的外部结构的背景下,在一个可能可持续的“进步”中,把一个恒定的或可预测的发展个人的想法放在研究的中心。相反,在日益增长的新结构下,个人能动性同时成为人性本质的表现(如文化心理学所言)和社会变革的驱动力,包括在具体的历史时期解决最尖锐的社会问题。这意味着社会科学和人文科学面临着一个全新的任务:阐述方法论解决方案和理论框架,以系统地理解受环境制约的人类创造和转化能力,而不仅仅是再生产能力。更多地关注数字环境中的代理表现,特别是那些与社会行动主义或志愿活动一致的表现,似乎对理解新结构世界中的人类活动特别有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science is an international interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the advancement of basic knowledge in the social and behavioral sciences. IPBS covers such topics as cultural nature of human conduct and its evolutionary history, anthropology, ethology, communication processes between people, and within-- as well as between-- societies. A special focus will be given to integration of perspectives of the social and biological sciences through theoretical models of epigenesis. It contains articles pertaining to theoretical integration of ideas, epistemology of social and biological sciences, and original empirical research articles of general scientific value. History of the social sciences is covered by IPBS in cases relevant for further development of theoretical perspectives and empirical elaborations within the social and biological sciences. IPBS has the goal of integrating knowledge from different areas into a new synthesis of universal social science—overcoming the post-modernist fragmentation of ideas of recent decades.
期刊最新文献
Instant Futures: an experimental study of the imagination of alternative near futures thanks to science fiction. Beyond the Narrowness of Disciplinary Borders: Biology and the Unconscious in Ferenczi's Thalassa-Primordial Phylogenetic Trauma and its Recapitulation in Ontogenesis. Exploring AI-Driven Feedback as a Cultural Tool: A Cultural-Historical Perspective on Design of AI Environments to Support Students' Writing Process. Goals as Motives: Implications for Theory, Methods, and Practice. Multiple Lurias. Reconstructing Alexander Romanovich's Life-Writing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1