Mental Health Problems of Self-Employed Workers: A Systematic Review of Potential Moderators.

IF 1.4 Journal of evidence-based social work (2019) Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1080/26408066.2024.2449042
Hao Wen, Yun Gao
{"title":"Mental Health Problems of Self-Employed Workers: A Systematic Review of Potential Moderators.","authors":"Hao Wen, Yun Gao","doi":"10.1080/26408066.2024.2449042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review aims to summarize the mental health outcomes of self-employment and identify potential moderators between self-employment and mental health issues, ultimately guiding future research and informing targeted suggestions for future practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The initial search identified 3412 publications, including 43 that met the inclusion criteria. We identified 20 potential moderators in total.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the summary results based on the diathesis-stress model, gender, financial precarity, and social security were identified as the most frequent potential moderators in each domain.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The systematic review highlights the complex relationship between self-employment and mental health, revealing that self-employment often correlates with negative mental health outcomes such as stress and depression. Future practice should prioritize financial stability strategies, gender-specific support initiatives, work-life balance improvements, and expanded social security protections for self-employed workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":73742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","volume":" ","pages":"207-233"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2024.2449042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This systematic review aims to summarize the mental health outcomes of self-employment and identify potential moderators between self-employment and mental health issues, ultimately guiding future research and informing targeted suggestions for future practice.

Method: The initial search identified 3412 publications, including 43 that met the inclusion criteria. We identified 20 potential moderators in total.

Results: According to the summary results based on the diathesis-stress model, gender, financial precarity, and social security were identified as the most frequent potential moderators in each domain.

Discussion: The systematic review highlights the complex relationship between self-employment and mental health, revealing that self-employment often correlates with negative mental health outcomes such as stress and depression. Future practice should prioritize financial stability strategies, gender-specific support initiatives, work-life balance improvements, and expanded social security protections for self-employed workers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个体经营者心理健康问题:潜在调节因子的系统评价
目的:本系统综述旨在总结个体创业的心理健康结果,并找出个体创业与心理健康问题之间潜在的调节因素,最终指导未来的研究并为未来的实践提供有针对性的建议。方法:初步检索到3412篇文献,其中43篇符合纳入标准。我们总共确定了20个潜在的审核员。结果:基于素质-压力模型的总结结果表明,性别、经济不稳定和社会保障是各领域最常见的潜在调节因素。讨论:系统综述强调了自主创业与心理健康之间的复杂关系,揭示了自主创业往往与压力和抑郁等负面心理健康结果相关。未来的实践应优先考虑金融稳定战略、针对性别的支持举措、改善工作与生活的平衡以及扩大对个体经营者的社会保障保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Small Models Achieve Large Language Model Performance: Evaluating Reasoning-Enabled AI for Secure Child Welfare Research. Practitioners' Views of Evidence-Based Practice in Social Work: A Scoping Review. Student Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence: Challenges, Opportunities, and Societal Implications. Clinical Social Workers' Perceptions of Large Language Models in Practice: Resistance to Automation and Prospects for Integration. Can a Large Language Model Judge a Child's Statement?: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Human Experts in Credibility Assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1