Safety of antenatal breastmilk expression from week 34 of pregnancy: a randomized controlled pilot study (The Express-MOM study).

Marie Bendix Simonsen, Sarah Bjerrum Bentzen, Sören Möller, Kristina Garne Holm, Christina Anne Vinter, Gitte Zachariassen
{"title":"Safety of antenatal breastmilk expression from week 34 of pregnancy: a randomized controlled pilot study (The Express-MOM study).","authors":"Marie Bendix Simonsen, Sarah Bjerrum Bentzen, Sören Möller, Kristina Garne Holm, Christina Anne Vinter, Gitte Zachariassen","doi":"10.1186/s40748-024-00197-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mother's own milk (MOM) is important as the first nutrition for preterm infants, but mothers often struggle to initiate milk production right after preterm birth. If antenatal breastmilk expression (aBME) does not induce preterm labor when performed before term age, it could promote nutrition with MOM right after preterm birth. In this pilot study, we aimed to investigate whether aBME induces preterm labor among healthy nulliparous women from week 34 of pregnancy, to examine if aBME promotes the availability of MOM right after birth and affects breastfeeding outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women were randomized to aBME (10 min 2 × daily) from week 34 of pregnancy until birth or to the control group. Both groups had a breastfeeding consultation between week 33 and 34 of pregnancy and were followed until eight weeks after birth. The primary outcome was gestational age (GA) at birth. Secondary outcomes were the availability of MOM and exclusive breastfeeding rates from 24 h to eight weeks after birth. Ranksum test and a posterior plot for the probability of non-inferiority were applied to the primary outcome. The availability of MOM is reported as medians and IQR. Breastfeeding outcomes were analyzed with mixed effects logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred forty-four pregnant women were eligible for participation, 51 were excluded, and 33 declined participation/did not answer inclusion phone calls. 60 women were included and randomized. Primary outcome data were available in 55 women (28 in intervention, 27 in control). We found no difference in GA at birth between the two groups: median (IQR), 40 + 1(39 + 5:41 + 2) in intervention vs. 40 + 2 (39 + 4:41 + 1) in control, p = 0.98. Antenatal expressed MOM was available at birth in most women in the intervention group (23/28, 82%), with a median of 52 mL during pregnancy. There was no statistically significant difference in breastfeeding outcomes. No adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>aBME performed by healthy nulliparous women from gestational week 34 did not induce preterm labor. In most women in the intervention group, MOM was available right after birth. The study results provide the basis for a trial among women at high risk for preterm birth.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong></p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov (NCT05516199).</p>","PeriodicalId":74120,"journal":{"name":"Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology","volume":"11 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11697818/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40748-024-00197-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mother's own milk (MOM) is important as the first nutrition for preterm infants, but mothers often struggle to initiate milk production right after preterm birth. If antenatal breastmilk expression (aBME) does not induce preterm labor when performed before term age, it could promote nutrition with MOM right after preterm birth. In this pilot study, we aimed to investigate whether aBME induces preterm labor among healthy nulliparous women from week 34 of pregnancy, to examine if aBME promotes the availability of MOM right after birth and affects breastfeeding outcomes.

Methods: Women were randomized to aBME (10 min 2 × daily) from week 34 of pregnancy until birth or to the control group. Both groups had a breastfeeding consultation between week 33 and 34 of pregnancy and were followed until eight weeks after birth. The primary outcome was gestational age (GA) at birth. Secondary outcomes were the availability of MOM and exclusive breastfeeding rates from 24 h to eight weeks after birth. Ranksum test and a posterior plot for the probability of non-inferiority were applied to the primary outcome. The availability of MOM is reported as medians and IQR. Breastfeeding outcomes were analyzed with mixed effects logistic regression.

Results: One hundred forty-four pregnant women were eligible for participation, 51 were excluded, and 33 declined participation/did not answer inclusion phone calls. 60 women were included and randomized. Primary outcome data were available in 55 women (28 in intervention, 27 in control). We found no difference in GA at birth between the two groups: median (IQR), 40 + 1(39 + 5:41 + 2) in intervention vs. 40 + 2 (39 + 4:41 + 1) in control, p = 0.98. Antenatal expressed MOM was available at birth in most women in the intervention group (23/28, 82%), with a median of 52 mL during pregnancy. There was no statistically significant difference in breastfeeding outcomes. No adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: aBME performed by healthy nulliparous women from gestational week 34 did not induce preterm labor. In most women in the intervention group, MOM was available right after birth. The study results provide the basis for a trial among women at high risk for preterm birth.

Trial registration:

Clinicaltrials: gov (NCT05516199).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠第34周开始的产前母乳表达的安全性:一项随机对照先导研究(The Express-MOM研究)。
背景:母乳(MOM)作为早产儿的第一营养是很重要的,但母亲在早产后往往很难开始产奶。如果在足月前进行的产前母乳表达(aBME)不会导致早产,那么它可以在早产后立即与妈妈一起促进营养。在这项初步研究中,我们的目的是调查aBME是否会在怀孕34周的健康未产妇女中诱发早产,以检查aBME是否会促进出生后母亲的可用性并影响母乳喂养结果。方法:从妊娠第34周开始,妇女随机分为aBME组(10分钟2次,每天)和对照组。两组都在怀孕第33周至34周期间进行了母乳喂养咨询,并一直随访到出生后8周。主要结局为出生时胎龄(GA)。次要结局是出生后24小时至8周的MOM和纯母乳喂养率。对主要结局采用秩和检验和非劣效性概率的后验图。MOM的可用性报告为中位数和IQR。采用混合效应logistic回归分析母乳喂养结果。结果:144名孕妇符合参与条件,51名被排除在外,33名拒绝参与或未接听纳入电话。60名妇女被纳入并随机分组。55名妇女(干预组28名,对照组27名)可获得主要结局数据。我们发现两组出生时GA没有差异:干预组的中位数(IQR)为40 + 1(39 + 5:41 + 2),对照组为40 + 2 (39 + 4:41 + 1),p = 0.98。干预组中大多数妇女(23/ 28,82%)出生时可获得产前表达MOM,妊娠期间中位数为52 mL。母乳喂养的结果没有统计学上的显著差异。无不良事件报告。结论:健康未产妇女妊娠34周起行aBME未诱发早产。在干预组的大多数妇女中,在出生后就可以进行MOM。研究结果为在高危早产妇女中进行试验提供了基础。试验注册:Clinicaltrials: gov (NCT05516199)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Acceptability of telemedicine for early surgical site infection diagnosis after cesarean delivery in rural Rwanda: a qualitative study. Charting a new course: advancing maternal and neonatal health through collaborative innovation. Safety of antenatal breastmilk expression from week 34 of pregnancy: a randomized controlled pilot study (The Express-MOM study). Is severe maternal morbidity a risk factor for postpartum hospitalization with mental health or substance use disorder diagnoses? Findings from a retrospective cohort study in Maryland: 2016-2019. High school diploma is associated with longer postpartum leukocyte telomere length in a cohort of primarily Latina women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1