The Cumulative Burden of Social Risk Factors and 10-Year Change in Quality of Life.

Ro-Jay Reid, Monika Safford, W Marcus Lambert, Joanna Bryan, Laura C Pinheiro, Madeline R Sterling, C Barrett Bowling, Emily B Levitan, Samprit Banerjee, Raegan Durant, Michael Kim, Jennifer D Lau, Parag Goyal
{"title":"The Cumulative Burden of Social Risk Factors and 10-Year Change in Quality of Life.","authors":"Ro-Jay Reid, Monika Safford, W Marcus Lambert, Joanna Bryan, Laura C Pinheiro, Madeline R Sterling, C Barrett Bowling, Emily B Levitan, Samprit Banerjee, Raegan Durant, Michael Kim, Jennifer D Lau, Parag Goyal","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glae222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social risk factors are linked to adverse health outcomes, but their total impact on long-term quality of life is obscure. We hypothesized that a higher burden of social risk factors is associated with greater decline in quality of life over 10 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined associations between social risk factors count and decline >5 points in (i) physical component summary, and (ii) mental component summary scores from the Short Form-12 among Black and White participants in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study (n = 14 401).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For physical component summary, White participants with 1 social risk factor had relative risk (RR) for decline of 1.14 [95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.07-1.12]. Those with ≥2 social risk factors had RR of 1.26 [95% CI: 1.17-1.35], after adjusting for baseline demographics, health behaviors, medical conditions, medications, and physiological variables. Black participants with 1 social risk factor had RR of 1.03 [95% CI: 0.93-1.15]. Those with ≥2 social risk factors had RR of 1.24 [95% CI: 1.13-1.36]. For mental component summary, White participants with 1 social risk factor had RR for decline of 1.19 [95% CI: 1.04-1.37]. Those with ≥2 social risk factors had RR of 1.47 [95% CI: 1.28-1.68]. Black participants with 1 social risk factor had RR of 1.18 [95% CI: 0.96-1.45]. Those with ≥2 social risk factors had RR of 1.38 [95% CI: 1.14-1.66].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>More social risk factors increased the risk of decline of quality of life for Black and White individuals, especially impacting mental health.</p>","PeriodicalId":94243,"journal":{"name":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11697184/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glae222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social risk factors are linked to adverse health outcomes, but their total impact on long-term quality of life is obscure. We hypothesized that a higher burden of social risk factors is associated with greater decline in quality of life over 10 years.

Methods: We examined associations between social risk factors count and decline >5 points in (i) physical component summary, and (ii) mental component summary scores from the Short Form-12 among Black and White participants in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study (n = 14 401).

Results: For physical component summary, White participants with 1 social risk factor had relative risk (RR) for decline of 1.14 [95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.07-1.12]. Those with ≥2 social risk factors had RR of 1.26 [95% CI: 1.17-1.35], after adjusting for baseline demographics, health behaviors, medical conditions, medications, and physiological variables. Black participants with 1 social risk factor had RR of 1.03 [95% CI: 0.93-1.15]. Those with ≥2 social risk factors had RR of 1.24 [95% CI: 1.13-1.36]. For mental component summary, White participants with 1 social risk factor had RR for decline of 1.19 [95% CI: 1.04-1.37]. Those with ≥2 social risk factors had RR of 1.47 [95% CI: 1.28-1.68]. Black participants with 1 social risk factor had RR of 1.18 [95% CI: 0.96-1.45]. Those with ≥2 social risk factors had RR of 1.38 [95% CI: 1.14-1.66].

Conclusions: More social risk factors increased the risk of decline of quality of life for Black and White individuals, especially impacting mental health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会风险因素累积负担与10年生活品质变化。
背景:社会风险因素与不良健康结果有关,但其对长期生活质量的总体影响尚不清楚。我们假设,社会风险因素负担越重,10年内生活质量下降越严重。方法:我们在卒中地理和种族差异的原因研究(n = 14401)中,研究了黑人和白人参与者的社会风险因素计数与(i)身体成分总结和(ii)精神成分总结得分之间的关系,这些得分来自Short Form-12。结果:对于身体成分总结,白人参与者有1个社会风险因素,其相对风险(RR)下降为1.14[95%置信区间(CI): 1.07-1.12]。在调整基线人口统计学、健康行为、医疗条件、药物和生理变量后,具有≥2个社会危险因素的患者的RR为1.26 [95% CI: 1.17-1.35]。有1个社会风险因素的黑人参与者的RR为1.03 [95% CI: 0.93-1.15]。社会危险因素≥2个的RR为1.24 [95% CI: 1.13-1.36]。对于心理成分总结,白人参与者有1个社会风险因素,其下降的RR为1.19 [95% CI: 1.04-1.37]。社会危险因素≥2个的RR为1.47 [95% CI: 1.28-1.68]。有1个社会风险因素的黑人参与者的RR为1.18 [95% CI: 0.96-1.45]。社会危险因素≥2个的RR为1.38 [95% CI: 1.14-1.66]。结论:更多的社会风险因素增加了黑人和白人个体生活质量下降的风险,尤其是影响心理健康的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Olfactory Function and Frailty in Older Adults. Investigating the role of adipose tissue in mobility and aging: design and methods of the Adipose Tissue ancillary to the Study of Muscle, Mobility and Aging (SOMMA-AT). Inhibition of OLR1 Reduces SASP of Nucleus Pulposus Cells by Targeting Autophagy-GATA4 Axis. Relationships Between APOE, Type 2 Diabetes, and Cardiovascular Disease in Postmenopausal Women. Sex Differences in Response to Diet Enriched With Glutathione Precursors in the Aging Heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1