Oligometastatic Esophagogastric Cancer: Does It Exist and How Do We Treat It?

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Current Oncology Reports Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1007/s11912-024-01625-3
Tiuri E Kroese, Sebastiaan F C Bronzwaer, Peter S N van Rossum, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Richard van Hillegersberg
{"title":"Oligometastatic Esophagogastric Cancer: Does It Exist and How Do We Treat It?","authors":"Tiuri E Kroese, Sebastiaan F C Bronzwaer, Peter S N van Rossum, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Richard van Hillegersberg","doi":"10.1007/s11912-024-01625-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the review: </strong>This narrative review aims to provide an overview of recently completed randomized trials and expert consensus recommendations, and their implications for clinical practice and future trial design in patients with de-novo esophagogastric oligometastatic disease (OMD).</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The IKF-575/RENAISSANCE phase III trial showed no significant overall survival difference between systemic therapy alone and systemic therapy combined with local therapy for patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and de-novo OMD, except for patients with retroperitoneal lymph node metastases only. The ESO-Shanghai 13 phase II trial demonstrated superiority of adding local therapy to systemic therapy for progression-free and overall survival in oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The OMEC project developed a multidisciplinary European consensus for OMD, proposing a restrictive definition of OMD. Clinical trial assessing the optimal treatment of care are urgently needed. The findings highlight the importance of strict patient selection for local metastasis-directed treatment and the need for stratifying patients based on histology and location of metastases. Future research should focus on identifying biomarkers and clinical features to guide multidisciplinary treatment approaches for OMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10861,"journal":{"name":"Current Oncology Reports","volume":" ","pages":"30-36"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762669/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-024-01625-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the review: This narrative review aims to provide an overview of recently completed randomized trials and expert consensus recommendations, and their implications for clinical practice and future trial design in patients with de-novo esophagogastric oligometastatic disease (OMD).

Recent findings: The IKF-575/RENAISSANCE phase III trial showed no significant overall survival difference between systemic therapy alone and systemic therapy combined with local therapy for patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer and de-novo OMD, except for patients with retroperitoneal lymph node metastases only. The ESO-Shanghai 13 phase II trial demonstrated superiority of adding local therapy to systemic therapy for progression-free and overall survival in oligometastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The OMEC project developed a multidisciplinary European consensus for OMD, proposing a restrictive definition of OMD. Clinical trial assessing the optimal treatment of care are urgently needed. The findings highlight the importance of strict patient selection for local metastasis-directed treatment and the need for stratifying patients based on histology and location of metastases. Future research should focus on identifying biomarkers and clinical features to guide multidisciplinary treatment approaches for OMD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
少转移性食管胃癌:存在吗?我们该如何治疗?
综述目的:本综述旨在概述最近完成的随机试验和专家共识建议,以及它们对食管胃寡转移性疾病(OMD)患者临床实践和未来试验设计的影响。最近的发现:IKF-575/RENAISSANCE III期试验显示,除了只有腹膜后淋巴结转移的患者外,单独全身治疗和全身治疗联合局部治疗对胃或胃食管结癌和新生OMD患者的总生存期没有显著差异。ESO-Shanghai 13期II期试验表明,在低转移性食管鳞状细胞癌的无进展和总生存率方面,局部治疗优于全身治疗。omc项目为OMD开发了多学科的欧洲共识,提出了OMD的限制性定义。迫切需要临床试验评估最佳治疗护理。研究结果强调了严格选择患者进行局部转移定向治疗的重要性,以及根据组织学和转移部位对患者进行分层的必要性。未来的研究应侧重于识别生物标志物和临床特征,以指导多学科治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published clinical findings in the field of oncology. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care of those affected by cancer. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as cancer prevention, leukemia, melanoma, neuro-oncology, and palliative medicine. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Muscle and Education-based Therapies on Bladder, Bowel, Vaginal, Sexual, Psychological Function, Quality of Life, and Pelvic Floor Muscle Function in Females Treated for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review. Novel Surgical Initiatives in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours. Advances in Radiation Oncology in Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Cardiotoxic Effects Following CAR-T Cell Therapy: A Literature Review. Therapeutic Management in Elderly Male Breast Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1