Investigating digital determinants shaping pharmacists' preparedness for interoperability and health informatics practice evolution: a systematic review.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1007/s11096-024-01851-6
Sabrina Ait Gacem, Hasniza Zaman Huri, Izyan A Wahab, Abduelmula R Abduelkarem
{"title":"Investigating digital determinants shaping pharmacists' preparedness for interoperability and health informatics practice evolution: a systematic review.","authors":"Sabrina Ait Gacem, Hasniza Zaman Huri, Izyan A Wahab, Abduelmula R Abduelkarem","doi":"10.1007/s11096-024-01851-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fragmented healthcare systems hinder pharmacists' access to comprehensive patient data, limiting their clinical role and posing health risks. Enhancing system interoperability and evaluating factors influencing pharmacists' readiness for technology-driven practice change is a crucial step.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This systematic review aimed to investigate the digital determinants of pharmacists' readiness for technology-oriented practice change and interoperability.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted on August 7, 2023, with registration number INPLASY202380071. Search method was developed, and quality was assessed using the Boynton and Greenhalgh Quality Checklist (BGQC) and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 13 studies, of which 7 (53.8%) included the study's setting. Of the seven studies, most discussed the community pharmacy setting (n = 3, 23.1%), followed by hospital pharmacy (n = 1, 7.6%), and both settings (n = 3, 23.1%). The studies included several countries: the United Kingdom (UK), Canada, the United States of America (USA), Australia, India, Sweden, and Saudi Arabia. The studies discussed several medical health informatic technologies such as electronic health records and e-prescribing. The three most reported technology-related influencing factors were related to digital literacy and technology-oriented tailored training (n = 9, 69.2%), followed by technical system features (n = 6, 46.2%) and technology operations (n = 5, 38.5%). The overall readiness level for technology-related practice change was intermediate (n = 7, 53.8%), high (n = 3, 23.1%), and low (n = 3, 23.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital literacy, tailored training, and system features are crucial for enhancing pharmacists' readiness for technology adoption, highlighting the need for improved digital infrastructure and interoperability in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":13828,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-024-01851-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fragmented healthcare systems hinder pharmacists' access to comprehensive patient data, limiting their clinical role and posing health risks. Enhancing system interoperability and evaluating factors influencing pharmacists' readiness for technology-driven practice change is a crucial step.

Aim: This systematic review aimed to investigate the digital determinants of pharmacists' readiness for technology-oriented practice change and interoperability.

Method: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted on August 7, 2023, with registration number INPLASY202380071. Search method was developed, and quality was assessed using the Boynton and Greenhalgh Quality Checklist (BGQC) and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP).

Results: The review included 13 studies, of which 7 (53.8%) included the study's setting. Of the seven studies, most discussed the community pharmacy setting (n = 3, 23.1%), followed by hospital pharmacy (n = 1, 7.6%), and both settings (n = 3, 23.1%). The studies included several countries: the United Kingdom (UK), Canada, the United States of America (USA), Australia, India, Sweden, and Saudi Arabia. The studies discussed several medical health informatic technologies such as electronic health records and e-prescribing. The three most reported technology-related influencing factors were related to digital literacy and technology-oriented tailored training (n = 9, 69.2%), followed by technical system features (n = 6, 46.2%) and technology operations (n = 5, 38.5%). The overall readiness level for technology-related practice change was intermediate (n = 7, 53.8%), high (n = 3, 23.1%), and low (n = 3, 23.1%).

Conclusion: Digital literacy, tailored training, and system features are crucial for enhancing pharmacists' readiness for technology adoption, highlighting the need for improved digital infrastructure and interoperability in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查数字决定因素塑造药剂师的互操作性和卫生信息学实践演变的准备:一个系统的审查。
背景:分散的医疗保健系统阻碍了药剂师获得全面的患者数据,限制了他们的临床作用并构成健康风险。加强系统互操作性和评估影响药师准备技术驱动的实践变化的因素是至关重要的一步。目的:本系统综述旨在调查数字决定因素药师准备技术导向的实践变化和互操作性。方法:系统检索PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane Library,检索时间为2023年8月7日,注册号为INPLASY202380071。开发了搜索方法,并使用Boynton和Greenhalgh质量检查表(BGQC)和关键评估技能计划(CASP)对质量进行评估。结果:纳入13项研究,其中7项(53.8%)纳入了本研究的设定。在7项研究中,讨论最多的是社区药房环境(n = 3, 23.1%),其次是医院药房环境(n = 1, 7.6%),以及两种环境(n = 3, 23.1%)。这些研究包括几个国家:联合王国、加拿大、美利坚合众国、澳大利亚、印度、瑞典和沙特阿拉伯。这些研究讨论了若干医疗保健信息技术,如电子健康记录和电子处方。报告最多的三个与技术相关的影响因素与数字素养和面向技术的定制培训相关(n = 9, 69.2%),其次是技术系统特征(n = 6, 46.2%)和技术操作(n = 5, 38.5%)。与技术相关的实践变化的总体准备水平为中等(n = 7, 53.8%)、高(n = 3, 23.1%)和低(n = 3, 23.1%)。结论:数字素养、量身定制的培训和系统功能对于提高药剂师对技术采用的准备程度至关重要,强调了在临床实践中改进数字基础设施和互操作性的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (IJCP) offers a platform for articles on research in Clinical Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Care and related practice-oriented subjects in the pharmaceutical sciences. IJCP is a bi-monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes original research data, new ideas and discussions on pharmacotherapy and outcome research, clinical pharmacy, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoeconomics, the clinical use of medicines, medical devices and laboratory tests, information on medicines and medical devices information, pharmacy services research, medication management, other clinical aspects of pharmacy. IJCP publishes original Research articles, Review articles , Short research reports, Commentaries, book reviews, and Letters to the Editor. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy is affiliated with the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy (ESCP). ESCP promotes practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy, especially in Europe. The general aim of the society is to advance education, practice and research in Clinical Pharmacy . Until 2010 the journal was called Pharmacy World & Science.
期刊最新文献
Investigating the controversy surrounding statin therapy and Achilles tendinopathy using Mendelian randomization analysis. Community pharmacists improving equitable access to contraceptive methods: a commentary. Bacillus coagulans TBC169 probiotics for intestinal function recovery after gynecological open surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patient and hospital staff perspectives on introducing pharmacist-led medication reviews at an orthopedic ward: a mixed methods pilot study. Medication-induced causes of delirium in patients with and without dementia: a systematic review of published neurology guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1