Carmine A Donofrio, Kenan Arnautovic, Lucia Riccio, Filippo Badaloni, Federico Roncaroli, Franco Servadei, R Shane Tubbs, Antonio Fioravanti
{"title":"Neurological and functional outcomes of 32 patients with hemorrhagic brainstem cavernous malformations: a practical guide for surgical planning.","authors":"Carmine A Donofrio, Kenan Arnautovic, Lucia Riccio, Filippo Badaloni, Federico Roncaroli, Franco Servadei, R Shane Tubbs, Antonio Fioravanti","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.JNS241171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Brainstem cavernous malformations (BSCMs) were once considered inoperable. Microsurgical resection now represents a valuable option for treating patients with hemorrhagic or symptomatic lesions. The aim of this study was to provide a practical guide for surgical planning by analyzing postoperative neurological and functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The early- and long-term neurological (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score) and functional (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] and Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS] scores) outcomes of 32 patients who underwent surgery for hemorrhagic BSCM were reviewed. The three-step surgical planning was based on an anatomosurgical algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine lesions (28.1%) were located in the mesencephalon, 19 (59.4%) in the pons, and 4 (12.5%) in the medulla. A fronto-temporo-orbito-zygomatic approach was selected to reach anterior mesencephalic BSCMs (2, 6.3%). A retrosigmoid approach and its extended variant were selected for lateral mesencephalic (6, 18.8%), anterior (2, 6.3%) and lateral (13, 40.6%) pontine, and anterior (1, 3.1%) and lateral (1, 3.1%) medullary BSCMs. A supracerebellar infratentorial approach was selected for posterior mesencephalic BSCMs (1, 3.1%). A telovelar approach was selected for posterior pontine (4, 12.5%) and medullary (2, 6.3%) BSCMs. Total resection was achieved in 29 cases (90.6%), with a 12.5% rate of surgical complications. The NIHSS score progressively improved at both the early (5.16 ± 3.70 vs 4.63 ± 2.78, p = 0.446) and late (4.63 ± 2.78 vs 2.41 ± 2.39, p < 0.001) postoperative evaluations. Functional outcomes showed an initial deterioration followed by a long-term improvement (mRS score: 2.66 ± 1.07 vs 3.06 ± 1.11 vs 2.13 ± 1.29, GOS score: 3.78 ± 0.61 vs 3.59 ± 0.62 vs 4.19 ± 0.78). Time to surgery significantly correlated with early- and long-term NIHSS, mRS, and GOS scores, while the number of hemorrhages before surgery correlated with early- and long-term mRS and GOS scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early surgery after the first bleed following systematic surgical planning may be considered as an effective option for managing hemorrhagic BSCMs with acceptable operative morbidity and relatively favorable early- and long-term neurological and functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.JNS241171","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Brainstem cavernous malformations (BSCMs) were once considered inoperable. Microsurgical resection now represents a valuable option for treating patients with hemorrhagic or symptomatic lesions. The aim of this study was to provide a practical guide for surgical planning by analyzing postoperative neurological and functional outcomes.
Methods: The early- and long-term neurological (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score) and functional (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] and Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS] scores) outcomes of 32 patients who underwent surgery for hemorrhagic BSCM were reviewed. The three-step surgical planning was based on an anatomosurgical algorithm.
Results: Nine lesions (28.1%) were located in the mesencephalon, 19 (59.4%) in the pons, and 4 (12.5%) in the medulla. A fronto-temporo-orbito-zygomatic approach was selected to reach anterior mesencephalic BSCMs (2, 6.3%). A retrosigmoid approach and its extended variant were selected for lateral mesencephalic (6, 18.8%), anterior (2, 6.3%) and lateral (13, 40.6%) pontine, and anterior (1, 3.1%) and lateral (1, 3.1%) medullary BSCMs. A supracerebellar infratentorial approach was selected for posterior mesencephalic BSCMs (1, 3.1%). A telovelar approach was selected for posterior pontine (4, 12.5%) and medullary (2, 6.3%) BSCMs. Total resection was achieved in 29 cases (90.6%), with a 12.5% rate of surgical complications. The NIHSS score progressively improved at both the early (5.16 ± 3.70 vs 4.63 ± 2.78, p = 0.446) and late (4.63 ± 2.78 vs 2.41 ± 2.39, p < 0.001) postoperative evaluations. Functional outcomes showed an initial deterioration followed by a long-term improvement (mRS score: 2.66 ± 1.07 vs 3.06 ± 1.11 vs 2.13 ± 1.29, GOS score: 3.78 ± 0.61 vs 3.59 ± 0.62 vs 4.19 ± 0.78). Time to surgery significantly correlated with early- and long-term NIHSS, mRS, and GOS scores, while the number of hemorrhages before surgery correlated with early- and long-term mRS and GOS scores.
Conclusions: Early surgery after the first bleed following systematic surgical planning may be considered as an effective option for managing hemorrhagic BSCMs with acceptable operative morbidity and relatively favorable early- and long-term neurological and functional outcomes.
目的:脑干海绵状畸形(BSCMs)曾被认为不能手术治疗。显微外科切除现在是治疗出血性或症状性病变患者的一个有价值的选择。本研究的目的是通过分析术后神经和功能结果,为手术计划提供实用的指导。方法:回顾性分析32例出血性BSCM手术患者的早期和长期神经学(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表[NIHSS]评分)和功能(改良Rankin量表[mRS]和格拉斯哥预后量表[GOS]评分)预后。三步手术计划是基于解剖外科算法。结果:中脑9例(28.1%),脑桥19例(59.4%),脑髓4例(12.5%)。选择额-颞-眶-颧入路到达前中脑BSCMs(2,6.3%)。乙状窦后入路及其扩展变体被选择用于侧中脑(6,18.8%),前(2,6.3%)和外侧(13,40.6%)脑桥,前(1,3.1%)和外侧(1,3.1%)髓质BSCMs。选择小脑上幕下入路治疗后中脑BSCMs(1.3.1%)。对于桥脑后(4.12.5%)和髓质(2.6.3%)BSCMs,选择了远侧入路。全部切除29例(90.6%),手术并发症发生率12.5%。NIHSS评分在术后早期(5.16±3.70 vs 4.63±2.78,p = 0.446)和后期(4.63±2.78 vs 2.41±2.39,p < 0.001)逐步改善。功能结果显示最初恶化,随后长期改善(mRS评分:2.66±1.07 vs 3.06±1.11 vs 2.13±1.29,GOS评分:3.78±0.61 vs 3.59±0.62 vs 4.19±0.78)。手术时间与早期和长期NIHSS、mRS和GOS评分显著相关,而术前出血次数与早期和长期mRS和GOS评分相关。结论:在系统的手术计划下,首次出血后的早期手术可能被认为是治疗出血性BSCMs的有效选择,手术发病率可接受,早期和长期神经和功能预后相对良好。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.