Thalamic deep brain stimulation for central poststroke pain syndrome: an international multicenter study.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.3171/2024.8.JNS24742
Andreas Nowacki, David Y Zhang, Can Sarica, Gavin J B Elias, Sweta Bajaj, Angelo Franzini, Andrea Franzini, Assel Saryyeva, Thuy Anh Khoa Nguyen, Tipu Aziz, Joachim K Krauss, Wilhelm Eisner, Andres M Lozano, Alexander L Green, Claudio Pollo
{"title":"Thalamic deep brain stimulation for central poststroke pain syndrome: an international multicenter study.","authors":"Andreas Nowacki, David Y Zhang, Can Sarica, Gavin J B Elias, Sweta Bajaj, Angelo Franzini, Andrea Franzini, Assel Saryyeva, Thuy Anh Khoa Nguyen, Tipu Aziz, Joachim K Krauss, Wilhelm Eisner, Andres M Lozano, Alexander L Green, Claudio Pollo","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.JNS24742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The effectiveness and optimal stimulation site of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for central poststroke pain (CPSP) remain elusive. The objective of this retrospective international multicenter study was to assess clinical as well as neuroimaging-based predictors of long-term outcomes after DBS for CPSP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors analyzed patient-based clinical and neuroimaging data of previously published and unpublished cohorts from 6 international DBS centers. DBS leads were reconstructed and normalized. A stimulation map was constructed on the basis of individual stimulation settings and associated outcomes. Furthermore, the authors projected the individual segmented stroke lesions and volumes of tissue activated (VTAs) of the stimulating electrode onto a normalized human connectome to obtain the connectivity profiles of the individual lesions and VTAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The authors analyzed the data of 54 patients, of whom 15 were excluded from the final analysis due to a lack of imaging data. Among the remaining 39 patients from 6 different cohorts, the authors found 14 (35.9%) responders who were defined by pain relief of at least 50% at 12-month follow-up. Stimulation mapping identified areas in the posterior limb of the internal capsule, the sensorimotor thalamus, and the medial and intralaminar thalamus as effective for pain reduction. Baseline characteristics did not differ between responders and nonresponders. The stimulation sites of the responders showed significantly reduced structural connectivity to the sensory areas of the cerebral cortex compared to nonresponders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This comprehensive, multicenter analysis corroborates the efficacy of DBS in treating CPSP for a relevant number of patients. The posterior limb of the internal capsule and the sensorimotor thalamus emerged as potential stimulation sweet spots. The difference in structural connectivity between responders and nonresponders may constitute a biomarker of effective stimulation that can help guide surgical planning in future well-designed prospective trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.JNS24742","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The effectiveness and optimal stimulation site of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for central poststroke pain (CPSP) remain elusive. The objective of this retrospective international multicenter study was to assess clinical as well as neuroimaging-based predictors of long-term outcomes after DBS for CPSP.

Methods: The authors analyzed patient-based clinical and neuroimaging data of previously published and unpublished cohorts from 6 international DBS centers. DBS leads were reconstructed and normalized. A stimulation map was constructed on the basis of individual stimulation settings and associated outcomes. Furthermore, the authors projected the individual segmented stroke lesions and volumes of tissue activated (VTAs) of the stimulating electrode onto a normalized human connectome to obtain the connectivity profiles of the individual lesions and VTAs.

Results: The authors analyzed the data of 54 patients, of whom 15 were excluded from the final analysis due to a lack of imaging data. Among the remaining 39 patients from 6 different cohorts, the authors found 14 (35.9%) responders who were defined by pain relief of at least 50% at 12-month follow-up. Stimulation mapping identified areas in the posterior limb of the internal capsule, the sensorimotor thalamus, and the medial and intralaminar thalamus as effective for pain reduction. Baseline characteristics did not differ between responders and nonresponders. The stimulation sites of the responders showed significantly reduced structural connectivity to the sensory areas of the cerebral cortex compared to nonresponders.

Conclusions: This comprehensive, multicenter analysis corroborates the efficacy of DBS in treating CPSP for a relevant number of patients. The posterior limb of the internal capsule and the sensorimotor thalamus emerged as potential stimulation sweet spots. The difference in structural connectivity between responders and nonresponders may constitute a biomarker of effective stimulation that can help guide surgical planning in future well-designed prospective trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丘脑深部脑刺激治疗中枢性卒中后疼痛综合征:一项国际多中心研究。
目的:脑深部电刺激(DBS)治疗中枢性脑卒中后疼痛(CPSP)的效果和最佳刺激部位尚不明确。这项回顾性国际多中心研究的目的是评估DBS治疗CPSP后长期预后的临床和基于神经影像学的预测因素。方法:作者分析了来自6个国际DBS中心的先前发表和未发表的队列患者的临床和神经影像学数据。DBS导联重建并归一化。根据单个增产设置和相关结果构建了增产图。此外,作者将单个脑卒中的分段病变和刺激电极激活的组织体积(VTAs)投射到规范化的人类连接组上,以获得单个病变和VTAs的连接谱。结果:作者分析了54例患者的资料,其中15例因缺乏影像学资料而被排除在最终分析之外。在来自6个不同队列的其余39例患者中,作者发现14例(35.9%)应答者在12个月的随访中疼痛缓解至少50%。刺激图谱确定了内囊后肢、感觉运动丘脑、内侧和层间丘脑的区域对减轻疼痛有效。基线特征在应答者和无应答者之间没有差异。与无反应者相比,反应者的刺激部位与大脑皮层感觉区域的结构连接明显减少。结论:这项全面的、多中心的分析证实了DBS治疗相关数量的CPSP患者的有效性。内囊后肢和感觉运动丘脑成为潜在的刺激甜蜜点。反应者和无反应者之间结构连通性的差异可能构成有效刺激的生物标志物,可以帮助指导未来精心设计的前瞻性试验的手术计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Celebrating advocacy: a pioneer and role model. Clinical and radiological presentation of cavernomas according to the Zabramski classification. Closing the gaps: strategies to improve global neurosurgical subspecialty care. Evaluation of diversity, equity, and inclusion information on US neurosurgery residency program websites. Impact of smoking on recurrence rates among wide-neck intracranial aneurysms treated with Woven EndoBridge: a multicenter retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1