Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between high and low tie ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in robotic rectal cancer surgery: a propensity score matching analysis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1007/s11701-024-02209-w
Yuli Yuan, Houqiong Ju, Yaxiong Liu, Yahang Liang, Tao Li, Yang Liu, Taiyuan Li
{"title":"Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between high and low tie ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in robotic rectal cancer surgery: a propensity score matching analysis.","authors":"Yuli Yuan, Houqiong Ju, Yaxiong Liu, Yahang Liang, Tao Li, Yang Liu, Taiyuan Li","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02209-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Robotic surgery is extensively used for rectal cancer treatment. Nonetheless, studies on whether to preserve the left colonic artery (LCA) during robotic rectal cancer surgery to reduce complications remain scarce and controversial. This study compared short-term outcomes of high tie (HT) and low tie (LT) ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in 455 patients undergoing robotic rectal cancer surgery between May 2018 and July 2022. Propensity score matching (PSM) minimized selection bias, resulting in 124 patients in each group. The LT group had a longer operative time (P < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in estimated blood loss, lymph node harvest, lymph node positivity, AJCC stage, hospital stay, or costs. Postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, and reoperations were also comparable. Univariate analysis identified hypoalbuminaemia, low tumor location, ASA scores III, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy as risk factors for postoperative complications. Multivariate analysis confirmed low serum albumin and low tumor location as significant factors. Importantly, HT did not increase the risk of complications in either analysis. These findings indicate that high ligation does not adversely affect short-term outcomes and highlight the need for further research to refine surgical strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02209-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Robotic surgery is extensively used for rectal cancer treatment. Nonetheless, studies on whether to preserve the left colonic artery (LCA) during robotic rectal cancer surgery to reduce complications remain scarce and controversial. This study compared short-term outcomes of high tie (HT) and low tie (LT) ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in 455 patients undergoing robotic rectal cancer surgery between May 2018 and July 2022. Propensity score matching (PSM) minimized selection bias, resulting in 124 patients in each group. The LT group had a longer operative time (P < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in estimated blood loss, lymph node harvest, lymph node positivity, AJCC stage, hospital stay, or costs. Postoperative complications, 30-day mortality, and reoperations were also comparable. Univariate analysis identified hypoalbuminaemia, low tumor location, ASA scores III, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy as risk factors for postoperative complications. Multivariate analysis confirmed low serum albumin and low tumor location as significant factors. Importantly, HT did not increase the risk of complications in either analysis. These findings indicate that high ligation does not adversely affect short-term outcomes and highlight the need for further research to refine surgical strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人直肠癌手术中肠系膜下动脉高位结扎与低位结扎短期手术效果的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
机器人手术被广泛用于直肠癌治疗。然而,关于机器人直肠癌手术中是否保留左结肠动脉(LCA)以减少并发症的研究仍然很少且存在争议。该研究比较了2018年5月至2022年7月期间455名接受机器人直肠癌手术的患者的肠系膜下动脉高结(HT)和低结(LT)结扎的短期结果。倾向评分匹配(PSM)最小化了选择偏差,导致每组124例患者。LT组手术时间更长(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
期刊最新文献
Single-surgeon training of 14 novice surgeons in robotic cholecystectomy: a study of 300 consecutive cases, assessing training outcomes and surgical performance. Long-term outcomes of robotic inguinal hernia repair (r-TAPP): a retrospective review of 434 consecutive cases by a single surgeon with 3-8 years of follow-up. Transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review of propensity-matched studies. Huscher modified technique for robotic pancreaticojejunostomy: a video report. Comparison of perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy among the da Vinci, hinotori, and Hugo robot-assisted surgery systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1