"We are doing it together, don't worry" - A qualitative study on the implementation of electronic medical records in German hospitals.

Kerstin Dittmer, Mi-Ran Okumu, Marina Beckmann, Natalia Cecon-Stabel, Paola Di Gion, Till Jes Hansen, Julia Jaschke, Ute Karbach, Juliane Köberlein-Neu, Maya Nocon, Carsten Rusniok, Jessica Schmara, Florian Wurster, Holger Pfaff
{"title":"\"We are doing it together, don't worry\" - A qualitative study on the implementation of electronic medical records in German hospitals.","authors":"Kerstin Dittmer, Mi-Ran Okumu, Marina Beckmann, Natalia Cecon-Stabel, Paola Di Gion, Till Jes Hansen, Julia Jaschke, Ute Karbach, Juliane Köberlein-Neu, Maya Nocon, Carsten Rusniok, Jessica Schmara, Florian Wurster, Holger Pfaff","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2024.11.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ongoing implementation of electronic medical records (EMRs) in German hospitals is currently slow. Implementation science widely acknowledges the barriers and facilitators to implementation. Thus, specific preconditions are necessary to address the former and to support an effective EMR implementation. However, a lack of knowledge exists about these necessary preconditions in Germany. This study aims to gain insight into key stakeholders' experiences with implementing EMR systems in German hospitals to identify preconditions for embedding EMRs in this social context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Expert interviews were conducted with members of hospital-wide implementation teams concerning EMR implementation. The interviewees belonged to the nursing, IT, medical, and pharmaceutical professions and worked in hospitals with different contextual characteristics. The interview guideline was based on the practical Consolidated Framework for Implementation, which supports the systematic assessment of potential barriers and facilitators to identify implementation strategies and necessary adaptations. Data was collected between May 2021 and September 2022, and the interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen interviews were conducted with employees from eleven hospitals. Five critical preconditions emerged for EMR implementation based on our analysis: 1) adaptation, where the clinical context and EMRs are aligned; 2) stakeholder co-production, where all relevant stakeholders (e. g., professional groups, departments, and hierarchical levels) are involved in planning, implementing, and evaluating; 3) end-user participation, where end-users are involved in the implementation through close support and training; 4) integration into daily routines, where EMRs are integrated into daily work, including work processes that initially require additional effort but are necessary to experience the relative advantages; and 5) the continuous Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle, where the EMR implementation process is continuously reviewed and adjusted. In addition, activities to enact these preconditions were derived based on the interview data.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings indicate that overall contextual adaptation is required. The five preconditions include essential activities to facilitate the integration of the EMR into daily routines. Participation, communication, and support are fundamental, as described in the international literature. Failure to comply with these preconditions can lead to challenges during implementation, such as end-user resistance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering social and technical aspects is paramount in implementing EMRs, which may also apply to future digital innovations' change management processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2024.11.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The ongoing implementation of electronic medical records (EMRs) in German hospitals is currently slow. Implementation science widely acknowledges the barriers and facilitators to implementation. Thus, specific preconditions are necessary to address the former and to support an effective EMR implementation. However, a lack of knowledge exists about these necessary preconditions in Germany. This study aims to gain insight into key stakeholders' experiences with implementing EMR systems in German hospitals to identify preconditions for embedding EMRs in this social context.

Methods: Expert interviews were conducted with members of hospital-wide implementation teams concerning EMR implementation. The interviewees belonged to the nursing, IT, medical, and pharmaceutical professions and worked in hospitals with different contextual characteristics. The interview guideline was based on the practical Consolidated Framework for Implementation, which supports the systematic assessment of potential barriers and facilitators to identify implementation strategies and necessary adaptations. Data was collected between May 2021 and September 2022, and the interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

Results: Thirteen interviews were conducted with employees from eleven hospitals. Five critical preconditions emerged for EMR implementation based on our analysis: 1) adaptation, where the clinical context and EMRs are aligned; 2) stakeholder co-production, where all relevant stakeholders (e. g., professional groups, departments, and hierarchical levels) are involved in planning, implementing, and evaluating; 3) end-user participation, where end-users are involved in the implementation through close support and training; 4) integration into daily routines, where EMRs are integrated into daily work, including work processes that initially require additional effort but are necessary to experience the relative advantages; and 5) the continuous Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle, where the EMR implementation process is continuously reviewed and adjusted. In addition, activities to enact these preconditions were derived based on the interview data.

Discussion: Our findings indicate that overall contextual adaptation is required. The five preconditions include essential activities to facilitate the integration of the EMR into daily routines. Participation, communication, and support are fundamental, as described in the international literature. Failure to comply with these preconditions can lead to challenges during implementation, such as end-user resistance.

Conclusion: Considering social and technical aspects is paramount in implementing EMRs, which may also apply to future digital innovations' change management processes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
期刊最新文献
Digital health technologies enabling the transition from pregnancy to early parenthood: A scoping review. "We are doing it together, don't worry" - A qualitative study on the implementation of electronic medical records in German hospitals. [The potential of telemedicine applications to achieve universal health service coverage using the example of teledermatology]. [Dermatological diagnostics in patients with "skin of color"- How confident are German dermatologists?] [Integration of physician assistants into primary care: Acceptance and concerns among general practitioners].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1