Efficacy of Transversus Thoracic Plane Block for Pain Management in Cardiac Surgeries.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Current Pain and Headache Reports Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1007/s11916-024-01357-w
Alan D Kaye, Carliss M Sampognaro, Shivam S Shah, Drake P Duplechin, Grant C Curry, Victoria A Rodriguez, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Jibin Mathew, Zachary R Palowsky, Sahar Shekoohi
{"title":"Efficacy of Transversus Thoracic Plane Block for Pain Management in Cardiac Surgeries.","authors":"Alan D Kaye, Carliss M Sampognaro, Shivam S Shah, Drake P Duplechin, Grant C Curry, Victoria A Rodriguez, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Jibin Mathew, Zachary R Palowsky, Sahar Shekoohi","doi":"10.1007/s11916-024-01357-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Effective pain management in cardiac surgery presents as a continuous challenge related to the intensity of postoperative pain and reliance on opioid therapy. The dependance of opioid-based therapies is concerning, as these therapies carry risk future addiction and potential severe side effects. The transversus thoracic plane block (TTPB) has emerged as a promising regional anesthesia technique that blocks the anterior branches of the intercostal nerves in the chest wall, potentially providing improved analgesia for cardiac surgery patients. The present investigation evaluates the efficacy of TTPB in reducing opioid consumption, decreasing postoperative pain scores, and enhancing recovery outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgeries.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Data from randomized controlled trials revealed that TTPB significantly reduced 24-hour opioid consumption, increased the time to first rescue analgesic, and lowered Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores both at rest and with movement, particularly in the first 12 h post-surgery. Additional benefits include fewer opioid-related side effects, such as nausea and pruritus, and reductions in intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. Studies also suggested that TTPB can support earlier extubation and accelerated recovery, contributing to higher patient satisfaction and overall improved postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite these promising results, challenges in technique standardization and limited long-term data are still obstacles that prevent widespread adoption. Achieving consistent TTPB efficacy requires technical precision in ultrasound guidance, and there is little research on its effectiveness across diverse populations, such as pediatric and high-risk cardiac patients. Addressing these gaps through multi-center, long-term studies could help establish TTPB as a prominent pain management strategy in cardiac surgery to minimize opioid dependence and enhance patient comfort and recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":50602,"journal":{"name":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","volume":"29 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pain and Headache Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-024-01357-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Effective pain management in cardiac surgery presents as a continuous challenge related to the intensity of postoperative pain and reliance on opioid therapy. The dependance of opioid-based therapies is concerning, as these therapies carry risk future addiction and potential severe side effects. The transversus thoracic plane block (TTPB) has emerged as a promising regional anesthesia technique that blocks the anterior branches of the intercostal nerves in the chest wall, potentially providing improved analgesia for cardiac surgery patients. The present investigation evaluates the efficacy of TTPB in reducing opioid consumption, decreasing postoperative pain scores, and enhancing recovery outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgeries.

Recent findings: Data from randomized controlled trials revealed that TTPB significantly reduced 24-hour opioid consumption, increased the time to first rescue analgesic, and lowered Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores both at rest and with movement, particularly in the first 12 h post-surgery. Additional benefits include fewer opioid-related side effects, such as nausea and pruritus, and reductions in intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. Studies also suggested that TTPB can support earlier extubation and accelerated recovery, contributing to higher patient satisfaction and overall improved postoperative outcomes.

Conclusion: Despite these promising results, challenges in technique standardization and limited long-term data are still obstacles that prevent widespread adoption. Achieving consistent TTPB efficacy requires technical precision in ultrasound guidance, and there is little research on its effectiveness across diverse populations, such as pediatric and high-risk cardiac patients. Addressing these gaps through multi-center, long-term studies could help establish TTPB as a prominent pain management strategy in cardiac surgery to minimize opioid dependence and enhance patient comfort and recovery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经胸平面阻滞治疗心脏手术疼痛的疗效。
回顾的目的:心脏手术中有效的疼痛管理是一个持续的挑战,与术后疼痛的强度和对阿片类药物治疗的依赖有关。阿片类药物疗法的依赖性令人担忧,因为这些疗法存在未来成瘾和潜在严重副作用的风险。横胸平面阻滞(TTPB)是一种很有前途的区域麻醉技术,它可以阻滞胸壁肋间神经的前支,可能为心脏手术患者提供更好的镇痛效果。本研究评估了TTPB在心脏手术患者减少阿片类药物消耗、降低术后疼痛评分和提高恢复结果方面的疗效。近期发现:来自随机对照试验的数据显示,TTPB可显著减少24小时阿片类药物的消耗,增加首次救援镇痛的时间,并降低休息和运动时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分,尤其是在手术后的前12小时。其他好处包括减少阿片类药物相关的副作用,如恶心和瘙痒,以及减少重症监护病房(ICU)的住院时间。研究还表明,TTPB可以支持早期拔管和加速恢复,有助于提高患者满意度和整体改善术后结果。结论:尽管取得了这些令人鼓舞的成果,但技术标准化方面的挑战和有限的长期数据仍然是阻碍广泛采用的障碍。达到一致的TTPB疗效需要超声引导的技术精度,并且很少有关于其在不同人群中的有效性的研究,例如儿科和高危心脏病患者。通过多中心的长期研究来解决这些差距,可以帮助建立TTPB作为心脏手术中重要的疼痛管理策略,以减少阿片类药物依赖,增强患者的舒适度和恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Pain and Headache Reports
Current Pain and Headache Reports CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published clinical findings regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and management of pain and headache. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care and prevention of pain and headache. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as anesthetic techniques in pain management, cluster headache, neuropathic pain, and migraine. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Steroid Facet Joint Injections for Axial Spinal Pain and Post Radiofrequency Ablation Neuritis: A Systematic Review. Efficacy of Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block for Pain Management in Hip Surgeries: A Narrative Review. Psychological Support for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review on the Validity of a Growing Remote Approach. An Overview of Prosopagnosia as a Symptom of Migraine: A Literature Review. Allodynia: A Review Article.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1