ATC-to-RxNorm mappings – A comparison between OHDSI Standardized Vocabularies and UMLS Metathesaurus

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS International Journal of Medical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105777
Rowdy de Groot , Savannah Glaser , Alexandra Kogan , Stephanie Medlock , Anna Alloni , Matteo Gabetta , Szymon Wilk , Nicolette de Keizer , Ronald Cornet
{"title":"ATC-to-RxNorm mappings – A comparison between OHDSI Standardized Vocabularies and UMLS Metathesaurus","authors":"Rowdy de Groot ,&nbsp;Savannah Glaser ,&nbsp;Alexandra Kogan ,&nbsp;Stephanie Medlock ,&nbsp;Anna Alloni ,&nbsp;Matteo Gabetta ,&nbsp;Szymon Wilk ,&nbsp;Nicolette de Keizer ,&nbsp;Ronald Cornet","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The World Health Organization global standard for representing drug data is the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification. However, it does not represent ingredients and other drug properties required by clinical decision support systems. A mapping to a terminology system that contains this information, like RxNorm, may help fill this gap. This work evaluates and compares the completeness of mappings from the chemical substance level (5th-level) ATC classes to RxNorm ingredient concepts in the OHDSI Standardized Vocabularies (OSV) and the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Metathesaurus.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>To check the concordance between OSV and UMLS we compared the included contents of ATC and RxNorm not only in OSV and UMLS but also in BioPortal and the National Library of Medicine (NLM) repository. For each repository, we determined the number of 5th-level ATC concepts, RxNorm ingredient concepts, missing classes and concepts, and the ATC categories with the most missing concepts. The mappings from ATC to RxNorm in OSV and UMLS were compared, and we determined the number of mappings in common, and the mapping differences, which we categorized. We applied the mappings from OSV and UMLS on a sample of Electronic Health Record (EHR) data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>NLM contained the most ATC and RxNorm concepts. UMLS contained more missing mappings (null mappings) than OSV, 1949 versus 916. Most mapping differences were in the “unknown ingredient in the ATC label” category, for which UMLS provided no mappings. UMLS had a higher coverage of mappings in the sample EHR data than OSV, 96.5% versus 91%.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>In conclusion, opting for OSV rather than UMLS is generally preferable for an ATC to RxNorm mapping since OSV provides more mappings. However, the results of the sample data show that UMLS can have fewer null mappings in concrete applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 105777"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505624004404","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The World Health Organization global standard for representing drug data is the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification. However, it does not represent ingredients and other drug properties required by clinical decision support systems. A mapping to a terminology system that contains this information, like RxNorm, may help fill this gap. This work evaluates and compares the completeness of mappings from the chemical substance level (5th-level) ATC classes to RxNorm ingredient concepts in the OHDSI Standardized Vocabularies (OSV) and the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) Metathesaurus.

Methods

To check the concordance between OSV and UMLS we compared the included contents of ATC and RxNorm not only in OSV and UMLS but also in BioPortal and the National Library of Medicine (NLM) repository. For each repository, we determined the number of 5th-level ATC concepts, RxNorm ingredient concepts, missing classes and concepts, and the ATC categories with the most missing concepts. The mappings from ATC to RxNorm in OSV and UMLS were compared, and we determined the number of mappings in common, and the mapping differences, which we categorized. We applied the mappings from OSV and UMLS on a sample of Electronic Health Record (EHR) data.

Results

NLM contained the most ATC and RxNorm concepts. UMLS contained more missing mappings (null mappings) than OSV, 1949 versus 916. Most mapping differences were in the “unknown ingredient in the ATC label” category, for which UMLS provided no mappings. UMLS had a higher coverage of mappings in the sample EHR data than OSV, 96.5% versus 91%.

Discussion

In conclusion, opting for OSV rather than UMLS is generally preferable for an ATC to RxNorm mapping since OSV provides more mappings. However, the results of the sample data show that UMLS can have fewer null mappings in concrete applications.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
atc到rxnorm的映射——OHDSI标准化词汇表和uml元词汇表之间的比较。
介绍:世界卫生组织表示药物数据的全球标准是解剖治疗化学(ATC)分类。然而,它并不代表临床决策支持系统所需的成分和其他药物特性。映射到包含此信息的术语系统(如RxNorm)可能有助于填补这一空白。这项工作评估并比较了OHDSI标准化词汇表(OSV)和统一医学语言系统(UMLS)元词典中从化学物质级(第5级)ATC类到RxNorm成分概念的映射的完整性。方法:比较OSV和UMLS中ATC和RxNorm的收录内容以及BioPortal和美国国家医学图书馆(National Library of Medicine, NLM)资料库中ATC和RxNorm的收录内容,以检验两者的一致性。对于每个存储库,我们确定了第5级ATC概念、RxNorm成分概念、缺失类和概念的数量,以及缺失概念最多的ATC类别的数量。比较了OSV和UMLS中从ATC到RxNorm的映射,我们确定了常见映射的数量,以及映射的差异,并对其进行了分类。我们将来自OSV和UMLS的映射应用于电子健康记录(EHR)数据样本。结果:NLM包含的ATC和RxNorm概念最多。UMLS比OSV, 1949和916包含更多的缺失映射(空映射)。大多数映射差异是在“ATC标签中的未知成分”类别中,对此UMLS没有提供映射。UMLS在样本EHR数据中的映射覆盖率高于OSV,分别为96.5%和91%。讨论:总之,选择OSV而不是UMLS通常更适合ATC到RxNorm的映射,因为OSV提供了更多的映射。然而,样本数据的结果表明,在具体的应用程序中,UMLS可以有更少的空映射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning for predicting outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A systematic review AI-driven triage in emergency departments: A review of benefits, challenges, and future directions Predicting cancer survival at different stages: Insights from fair and explainable machine learning approaches The fading structural prominence of explanations in clinical studies Utilization, challenges, and training needs of digital health technologies: Perspectives from healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1