A simulation model for imbalance costs of renewable energy aggregators: The case of Greek balancing market

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Economics Pub Date : 2024-12-29 DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108155
Filippos Ioannidis, Tatiani Georgitsioti, Kyriaki Kosmidou, Constantinos Zopounidis, Kostas Andriosopoulos
{"title":"A simulation model for imbalance costs of renewable energy aggregators: The case of Greek balancing market","authors":"Filippos Ioannidis, Tatiani Georgitsioti, Kyriaki Kosmidou, Constantinos Zopounidis, Kostas Andriosopoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increased penetration of renewable energy sources in Europe has accelerated the participation of aggregators in the wholesale electricity markets. Those participants are responsible for market representation and act as balancing responsible parties for any volume deviation between forecast and actual generation. The Greek Balancing Market is used as a case study, since it is considered as one of the most rapidly growing renewable energy markets across Europe. In this paper, we develop a simulation model able to capture the financial impact of non-compliance charges burdened by aggregators of different size including national terms and conditions. The analysis is also applied to a stressed scenario by assuming marginal deviation above their regulated tolerance limits. Results indicate that for aggregators with market share greater than 5 %, by assuming a double increase in GWh of their annual deviation, would eventually lead to four times higher non-compliance charges. Likewise, an aggregator with capacity of 550 MW would encounter annual non-compliance charges ranging from 1 million € to 2.7 million € for a deviation range of 5 % to 6.5 %. Those findings indicate significant balancing costs burdened by aggregators that jeopardize their long-term viability and eventually the whole market's operation. This is the first paper to empirically capture the complexity of aggregators market in Greece and highlights the necessity to adjust the current electricity market framework by regulators and policymakers.","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108155","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increased penetration of renewable energy sources in Europe has accelerated the participation of aggregators in the wholesale electricity markets. Those participants are responsible for market representation and act as balancing responsible parties for any volume deviation between forecast and actual generation. The Greek Balancing Market is used as a case study, since it is considered as one of the most rapidly growing renewable energy markets across Europe. In this paper, we develop a simulation model able to capture the financial impact of non-compliance charges burdened by aggregators of different size including national terms and conditions. The analysis is also applied to a stressed scenario by assuming marginal deviation above their regulated tolerance limits. Results indicate that for aggregators with market share greater than 5 %, by assuming a double increase in GWh of their annual deviation, would eventually lead to four times higher non-compliance charges. Likewise, an aggregator with capacity of 550 MW would encounter annual non-compliance charges ranging from 1 million € to 2.7 million € for a deviation range of 5 % to 6.5 %. Those findings indicate significant balancing costs burdened by aggregators that jeopardize their long-term viability and eventually the whole market's operation. This is the first paper to empirically capture the complexity of aggregators market in Greece and highlights the necessity to adjust the current electricity market framework by regulators and policymakers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
期刊最新文献
Ensuring the security of the clean energy transition: Examining the impact of geopolitical risk on the price of critical minerals Digitizing energy supply chains for enhanced resilience: Exploring the nexus between supply chain digitization, carbon neutrality, and natural resource extraction Integrating renewable energy resources in electricity distribution systems—A firm-level efficiency analysis for Sweden controlling for weather conditions Determining the profitability of energy storage over its life cycle using levelized cost of storage Corrigendum to “Understanding the effects of artificial intelligence on energy transition: The moderating role of Paris Agreement” [Energy Economics Volume 131, March 2024, 107388]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1