Limited Benefit of Routine Clinical Follow-Up for Relapse Detection in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients in Complete Remission Following First-Line Treatment

IF 10.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY American Journal of Hematology Pub Date : 2025-01-05 DOI:10.1002/ajh.27577
Therese Lassen, Torsten H. Nielsen, Annika von Heymann, Lene K. Nielsen, Morten K. Larsen, Anne O. Gang, Christoffer Johansen, Lars M. Pedersen
{"title":"Limited Benefit of Routine Clinical Follow-Up for Relapse Detection in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients in Complete Remission Following First-Line Treatment","authors":"Therese Lassen, Torsten H. Nielsen, Annika von Heymann, Lene K. Nielsen, Morten K. Larsen, Anne O. Gang, Christoffer Johansen, Lars M. Pedersen","doi":"10.1002/ajh.27577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite advances in treatment, approximately 15% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who achieve complete remission (CR) after first-line therapy will experience a relapse. However, there is no consensus on the optimal follow-up strategies for detecting relapse after achieving CR. This population-based study, based on the Danish Lymphoma Registry (LYFO), identified a total of 1634 patients diagnosed with DLBCL between 2010 and 2017, including 105 patients who achieved CR following first-line R-CHOP-like therapy and subsequently relapsed. The median follow-up time was 6 years (range 3–8 years). Most cases of relapse were symptomatic (83%), with B symptoms and peripheral lymphadenopathy being the most common. Asymptomatic relapses were identified through physical examination (1%), blood tests (3%), or imaging findings (13%). The proportion of relapses identified outside routine visits was 70%. Only 5% of scheduled routine visits led to a relapse diagnosis, whereas 74% of unscheduled visits initiated by the patient outside routine follow-up resulted in relapse detection. Our findings highlight that systematic, scheduled monitoring of patients in remission after first-line treatment contributes only modestly to the early detection of disease recurrence. Future studies should explore alternative methods of relapse surveillance rather than relying solely on pre-scheduled clinical follow-up.","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.27577","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite advances in treatment, approximately 15% of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who achieve complete remission (CR) after first-line therapy will experience a relapse. However, there is no consensus on the optimal follow-up strategies for detecting relapse after achieving CR. This population-based study, based on the Danish Lymphoma Registry (LYFO), identified a total of 1634 patients diagnosed with DLBCL between 2010 and 2017, including 105 patients who achieved CR following first-line R-CHOP-like therapy and subsequently relapsed. The median follow-up time was 6 years (range 3–8 years). Most cases of relapse were symptomatic (83%), with B symptoms and peripheral lymphadenopathy being the most common. Asymptomatic relapses were identified through physical examination (1%), blood tests (3%), or imaging findings (13%). The proportion of relapses identified outside routine visits was 70%. Only 5% of scheduled routine visits led to a relapse diagnosis, whereas 74% of unscheduled visits initiated by the patient outside routine follow-up resulted in relapse detection. Our findings highlight that systematic, scheduled monitoring of patients in remission after first-line treatment contributes only modestly to the early detection of disease recurrence. Future studies should explore alternative methods of relapse surveillance rather than relying solely on pre-scheduled clinical follow-up.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
363
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Hematology offers extensive coverage of experimental and clinical aspects of blood diseases in humans and animal models. The journal publishes original contributions in both non-malignant and malignant hematological diseases, encompassing clinical and basic studies in areas such as hemostasis, thrombosis, immunology, blood banking, and stem cell biology. Clinical translational reports highlighting innovative therapeutic approaches for the diagnosis and treatment of hematological diseases are actively encouraged.The American Journal of Hematology features regular original laboratory and clinical research articles, brief research reports, critical reviews, images in hematology, as well as letters and correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Minimal Residual Disease Negativity as a Surrogate Endpoint for Treatment Efficacy in Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Budesonide, Added to PTCy-Based Regimen, for Prevention of Acute GI GVHD After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Breaking the Bone Marrow Barrier: Peripheral Blood as a Gateway to Measurable Residual Disease Detection in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Hyper-CVAD and Sequential Blinatumomab Without and With Inotuzumab in Young Adults With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Limited Benefit of Routine Clinical Follow-Up for Relapse Detection in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients in Complete Remission Following First-Line Treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1