Quality and impact of youtube for patient education on prostatic artery embolization.

IF 2.3 3区医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Abdominal Radiology Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1007/s00261-024-04790-y

Connor C Jacob, Mina S Makary

{"title":"Quality and impact of youtube for patient education on prostatic artery embolization.","authors":"Connor C Jacob, Mina S Makary","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04790-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate the quality of YouTube videos on patient education concerning prostatic artery embolization (PAE).Methods: All PAE videos on YouTube were evaluated in December 2023. The quality of the videos was evaluated utilizing the DISCERN Scale Criterion. The popularity and engagement of each video was assessed using the Video Power Index (VPI) and Viewer Impact Score (VIS), respectively. Comparisons of these metrics were conducted and stratified by the video source type including academic institution, interventional radiologist, and patient testimony. Data describing discussion of risks, benefits, and indications were further collected.Results: Of the 43 videos, video characteristics included duration (mean = 4.6 min), views (mean = 16,885), and likes (mean = 139). The mean DISCERN, VPI, and VIS scores were 47.9, 15.0, and 36.9, respectively. There was no correlation between quality, and popularity (R2 = 0.09) or engagement (R2 = 0.01). Videos featuring board-certified physicians did not significantly improved DISCERN scores (p = 0.13), VPI (p = 0.15), or VIS (p = 0.39) scores when compared to those without. Content by interventional radiologists demonstrated higher popularity compared to videos featuring other specialties (p = 0.04), but there was no difference in quality (p = 0.18).Conclusion: Educational videos about PAE on YouTube are of average quality. Clinicians should be aware of the general state of online information concerning PAE and guide patients towards high quality resources.","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04790-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the quality of YouTube videos on patient education concerning prostatic artery embolization (PAE).

Methods: All PAE videos on YouTube were evaluated in December 2023. The quality of the videos was evaluated utilizing the DISCERN Scale Criterion. The popularity and engagement of each video was assessed using the Video Power Index (VPI) and Viewer Impact Score (VIS), respectively. Comparisons of these metrics were conducted and stratified by the video source type including academic institution, interventional radiologist, and patient testimony. Data describing discussion of risks, benefits, and indications were further collected.

Results: Of the 43 videos, video characteristics included duration (mean = 4.6 min), views (mean = 16,885), and likes (mean = 139). The mean DISCERN, VPI, and VIS scores were 47.9, 15.0, and 36.9, respectively. There was no correlation between quality, and popularity (R² = 0.09) or engagement (R² = 0.01). Videos featuring board-certified physicians did not significantly improved DISCERN scores (p = 0.13), VPI (p = 0.15), or VIS (p = 0.39) scores when compared to those without. Content by interventional radiologists demonstrated higher popularity compared to videos featuring other specialties (p = 0.04), but there was no difference in quality (p = 0.18).

Conclusion: Educational videos about PAE on YouTube are of average quality. Clinicians should be aware of the general state of online information concerning PAE and guide patients towards high quality resources.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

youtube对前列腺动脉栓塞患者教育的质量和影响。

目的：评价YouTube上前列腺动脉栓塞（PAE）患者教育视频的质量。方法：对2023年12月YouTube上所有PAE视频进行评价。使用DISCERN量表标准评估视频的质量。每个视频的受欢迎程度和参与度分别使用视频功率指数（VPI）和观众影响评分（VIS）进行评估。对这些指标进行比较，并按视频来源类型（包括学术机构、介入放射科医生和患者证词）进行分层。进一步收集描述风险、益处和适应症讨论的数据。结果：在43个视频中，视频特征包括时长（平均4.6分钟）、观看次数（平均16885次）和点赞（平均139次）。平均分辨力、VPI和VIS得分分别为47.9、15.0和36.9。质量与受欢迎程度（R2 = 0.09）或参与度（R2 = 0.01）之间没有相关性。与没有视频的视频相比，以委员会认证医生为主角的视频并没有显著提高DISCERN分数（p = 0.13）、VPI分数（p = 0.15）或VIS分数（p = 0.39）。与其他专业的视频相比，介入放射科医生的内容更受欢迎（p = 0.04），但质量没有差异（p = 0.18）。结论：YouTube上关于PAE的教育视频质量一般。临床医生应该了解关于PAE的在线信息的一般状态，并引导患者获得高质量的资源。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

CiteScore

5.20

自引率

8.30%

发文量

334

期刊介绍： Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits