Health Care Resource Use and Medical Costs Among Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Acute Suicidal Ideation or Behavior Initiated on Esketamine Nasal Spray or Traditional Treatments in the United States.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical therapeutics Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.12.006
Lisa Harding, Maryia Zhdanava, Amanda Teeple, Aditi Shah, Porpong Boonmak, Dominic Pilon, Kruti Joshi
{"title":"Health Care Resource Use and Medical Costs Among Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Acute Suicidal Ideation or Behavior Initiated on Esketamine Nasal Spray or Traditional Treatments in the United States.","authors":"Lisa Harding, Maryia Zhdanava, Amanda Teeple, Aditi Shah, Porpong Boonmak, Dominic Pilon, Kruti Joshi","doi":"10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.12.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Major depressive disorder with acute suicidal ideation or behavior (MDSI) is a substantial humanistic, economic, and clinical burden on patients. Data on health care resource use (HRU) and costs among patients with MDSI initiated on esketamine nasal spray relative to traditional treatments are limited. This study sought to describe HRU and medical costs of patients with MDSI initiated on esketamine, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), antidepressant with second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) augmentation, and antidepressant monotherapy in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with MDSI from Merative® MarketScan® Commercial Databases (January 2016 to January 2022) were categorized into esketamine, ECT, SGA augmentation, and antidepressant monotherapy cohorts based on treatments initiated on or after August 5, 2020 (index date). Baseline period spanned 12 months before index date; follow-up period spanned from the index date till the end of data/health plan eligibility. Acute care HRU (inpatient and emergency department days) and medical costs excluding index treatment costs were described per-patient-per-month among all cohorts.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The number of patients in the respective cohorts was 122 for esketamine, 336 for ECT, 9958 for SGA augmentation, and 4496 for antidepressant monotherapy. Across cohorts, mean patient age ranged from 29.1 to 41.2 years, and the majority of patients were female (range, 57.2%-65.6%). During the follow-up period, mean all-cause acute care HRU was 0.59 days in the esketamine cohort, which trended lower than in the ECT (3.17 days) and SGA augmentation (0.92 days) cohorts, and higher than in the antidepressant monotherapy cohort (0.32 days). Mean acute care HRU decreased from baseline in the esketamine, SGA augmentation, and antidepressant monotherapy cohorts by 58%, 21%, and 37% and increased in the ECT cohort by 44%. Mean follow-up medical costs per-patient-per-month were $1869 in the esketamine cohort, which trended lower than in the ECT ($4624) and SGA augmentation ($2163) cohorts, and higher than in the antidepressant monotherapy ($863) cohort. Relative to baseline, medical costs decreased in all cohorts (esketamine, 50%; ECT, 22%; SGA augmentation, 17%; antidepressant monotherapy, 32%).</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Acute care HRU and medical costs trended lower among patients with MDSI initiated on esketamine nasal spray versus ECT or SGA augmentation; HRU and costs reduced most from pretreatment levels among patients treated with esketamine nasal spray versus patients treated with ECT, SGA augmentation, and antidepressant monotherapy. Results of this study may aid physicians in determining optimal treatments for the vulnerable MDSI population.</p>","PeriodicalId":10699,"journal":{"name":"Clinical therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.12.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Major depressive disorder with acute suicidal ideation or behavior (MDSI) is a substantial humanistic, economic, and clinical burden on patients. Data on health care resource use (HRU) and costs among patients with MDSI initiated on esketamine nasal spray relative to traditional treatments are limited. This study sought to describe HRU and medical costs of patients with MDSI initiated on esketamine, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), antidepressant with second-generation antipsychotic (SGA) augmentation, and antidepressant monotherapy in the United States.

Methods: Adults with MDSI from Merative® MarketScan® Commercial Databases (January 2016 to January 2022) were categorized into esketamine, ECT, SGA augmentation, and antidepressant monotherapy cohorts based on treatments initiated on or after August 5, 2020 (index date). Baseline period spanned 12 months before index date; follow-up period spanned from the index date till the end of data/health plan eligibility. Acute care HRU (inpatient and emergency department days) and medical costs excluding index treatment costs were described per-patient-per-month among all cohorts.

Findings: The number of patients in the respective cohorts was 122 for esketamine, 336 for ECT, 9958 for SGA augmentation, and 4496 for antidepressant monotherapy. Across cohorts, mean patient age ranged from 29.1 to 41.2 years, and the majority of patients were female (range, 57.2%-65.6%). During the follow-up period, mean all-cause acute care HRU was 0.59 days in the esketamine cohort, which trended lower than in the ECT (3.17 days) and SGA augmentation (0.92 days) cohorts, and higher than in the antidepressant monotherapy cohort (0.32 days). Mean acute care HRU decreased from baseline in the esketamine, SGA augmentation, and antidepressant monotherapy cohorts by 58%, 21%, and 37% and increased in the ECT cohort by 44%. Mean follow-up medical costs per-patient-per-month were $1869 in the esketamine cohort, which trended lower than in the ECT ($4624) and SGA augmentation ($2163) cohorts, and higher than in the antidepressant monotherapy ($863) cohort. Relative to baseline, medical costs decreased in all cohorts (esketamine, 50%; ECT, 22%; SGA augmentation, 17%; antidepressant monotherapy, 32%).

Implications: Acute care HRU and medical costs trended lower among patients with MDSI initiated on esketamine nasal spray versus ECT or SGA augmentation; HRU and costs reduced most from pretreatment levels among patients treated with esketamine nasal spray versus patients treated with ECT, SGA augmentation, and antidepressant monotherapy. Results of this study may aid physicians in determining optimal treatments for the vulnerable MDSI population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国艾氯胺酮鼻腔喷雾剂或传统治疗引发的重度抑郁症患者急性自杀意念或行为的卫生保健资源使用和医疗费用
目的:重度抑郁症伴急性自杀意念或行为(MDSI)对患者来说是一个巨大的人文、经济和临床负担。与传统治疗相比,开始使用艾氯胺酮鼻腔喷雾剂的MDSI患者的卫生保健资源使用(HRU)和成本数据有限。本研究旨在描述在美国开始使用艾氯胺酮、电休克治疗(ECT)、抗抑郁药加第二代抗精神病药(SGA)增强和抗抑郁药单药治疗的MDSI患者的HRU和医疗费用。方法:从Merative®MarketScan®商业数据库(2016年1月至2022年1月)中,根据2020年8月5日(索引日期)或之后开始的治疗,将MDSI成人患者分为艾氯胺酮、ECT、SGA增强和抗抑郁单药治疗组。基准期为指数日期前12个月;随访期从索引日起至数据/健康计划资格终止。在所有队列中描述每个患者每月的急性护理HRU(住院和急诊科天数)和医疗费用(不包括指数治疗费用)。结果:在各自的队列中,艾氯胺酮组的患者人数为122人,ECT组为336人,SGA增强组为9958人,抗抑郁单药组为4496人。在整个队列中,患者的平均年龄为29.1至41.2岁,大多数患者为女性(57.2%至65.6%)。在随访期间,艾氯胺酮组的平均全因急性护理HRU为0.59天,低于ECT组(3.17天)和SGA增强组(0.92天),高于抗抑郁药单药组(0.32天)。在艾氯胺酮、SGA增强和抗抑郁单药治疗组中,平均急性护理HRU比基线下降了58%、21%和37%,而在ECT组中增加了44%。艾氯胺酮组每个患者每月平均随访医疗费用为1869美元,低于ECT组(4624美元)和SGA增强组(2163美元),高于抗抑郁药单药治疗组(863美元)。相对于基线,所有队列的医疗费用都下降了(艾氯胺酮,50%;等,22%;SGA增强,17%;抗抑郁单药治疗,32%)。结论:与ECT或SGA增强相比,使用艾氯胺酮鼻腔喷雾剂的MDSI患者的急性护理HRU和医疗费用倾向较低;与ECT、SGA增强和抗抑郁单药治疗相比,使用艾氯胺酮鼻腔喷雾剂治疗的患者HRU和费用较预处理水平降低最多。本研究的结果可以帮助医生确定易感MDSI人群的最佳治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical therapeutics
Clinical therapeutics 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
154
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Therapeutics provides peer-reviewed, rapid publication of recent developments in drug and other therapies as well as in diagnostics, pharmacoeconomics, health policy, treatment outcomes, and innovations in drug and biologics research. In addition Clinical Therapeutics features updates on specific topics collated by expert Topic Editors. Clinical Therapeutics is read by a large international audience of scientists and clinicians in a variety of research, academic, and clinical practice settings. Articles are indexed by all major biomedical abstracting databases.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Oral Medication in Weight Loss Management: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Managed Entry Agreements: Tools of Necessity, Works in Progress. Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Refine Dosing of Posaconazole in Young Children. Real-World Treatment Patterns Among US Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Initiating Treatment With Once Weekly Semaglutide for Diabetes. Assessing Experiences With Trofinetide for Rett Syndrome: Interviews With Caregivers of Participants in Clinical Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1