The Impact of Cardiac Damage on In-Hospital Outcomes for Patients With Aortic Stenosis in the United States: An Analysis From The National Inpatient Sample.
Chun Shing Kwok, Sadie Bennett, Mithilesh Joshi, Adnan I Qureshi, Khaled Elsayed, Anikethana Appaji, Eric Holroyd, Philippe Pibarot, Bjorn Redfors, Philippe Genereux
{"title":"The Impact of Cardiac Damage on In-Hospital Outcomes for Patients With Aortic Stenosis in the United States: An Analysis From The National Inpatient Sample.","authors":"Chun Shing Kwok, Sadie Bennett, Mithilesh Joshi, Adnan I Qureshi, Khaled Elsayed, Anikethana Appaji, Eric Holroyd, Philippe Pibarot, Bjorn Redfors, Philippe Genereux","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this study is to determine if cardiac damage based on hospital discharge codes is associated with in-hospital outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis (AS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of hospital admissions between 2016 and 2021 with a diagnosis of AS in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). The cardiac damage stages 0-4 were determined based on hospital discharge codes. Logistic and linear regressions were used to determine the association between cardiac stage and in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LoS) and cost.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,980,150 hospital admissions were included in the analysis (82.5% conservative management, 11.2% transcatheter aortic valve replacement [TAVR], 6.3% surgical aortic valve replacement [SAVR]). The association between cardiac damage stage and in-hospital outcome was most significant for patients who had SAVR treatment (stage 4 vs. stage 0: mortality OR 27.70 95% CI 17.35-35.17, LoS 7.34 95% CI 6.34-8.35, cost 70,710 95% CI 65,110-76,310) compared to TAVR treatment (stage 4 vs. stage 0: mortality OR 9.15 95% CI 5.52-15.15, LoS 6.27 95% CI 5.63-6.90, cost 28,384 25,084 to 31,684) and conservative treatment (stage 4 vs. stage 0: mortality OR 3.55 95% CI 3.13-4.04, LoS 2.09 95% CI 1.87 to 2.31, cost 6362 95% CI 5642-7083).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cardiac damage can be evaluated using diagnostic codes in patients with AS and it is associated with in-hospital mortality, LoS and cost, and has more impact on these outcomes in patients treated with SAVR versus those treated with TAVR.</p>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The objective of this study is to determine if cardiac damage based on hospital discharge codes is associated with in-hospital outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis (AS).
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of hospital admissions between 2016 and 2021 with a diagnosis of AS in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). The cardiac damage stages 0-4 were determined based on hospital discharge codes. Logistic and linear regressions were used to determine the association between cardiac stage and in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LoS) and cost.
Results: A total of 2,980,150 hospital admissions were included in the analysis (82.5% conservative management, 11.2% transcatheter aortic valve replacement [TAVR], 6.3% surgical aortic valve replacement [SAVR]). The association between cardiac damage stage and in-hospital outcome was most significant for patients who had SAVR treatment (stage 4 vs. stage 0: mortality OR 27.70 95% CI 17.35-35.17, LoS 7.34 95% CI 6.34-8.35, cost 70,710 95% CI 65,110-76,310) compared to TAVR treatment (stage 4 vs. stage 0: mortality OR 9.15 95% CI 5.52-15.15, LoS 6.27 95% CI 5.63-6.90, cost 28,384 25,084 to 31,684) and conservative treatment (stage 4 vs. stage 0: mortality OR 3.55 95% CI 3.13-4.04, LoS 2.09 95% CI 1.87 to 2.31, cost 6362 95% CI 5642-7083).
Conclusions: Cardiac damage can be evaluated using diagnostic codes in patients with AS and it is associated with in-hospital mortality, LoS and cost, and has more impact on these outcomes in patients treated with SAVR versus those treated with TAVR.
本研究的目的是确定基于出院代码的心脏损伤是否与主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的住院预后相关。方法:我们对2016年至2021年期间在国家住院患者样本(NIS)中诊断为AS的住院患者进行了回顾性队列研究。根据医院出院代码确定心脏损伤0-4级。采用Logistic和线性回归来确定心脏分期与住院死亡率、住院时间(LoS)和费用之间的关系。结果:共有2980150例住院患者被纳入分析,其中保守治疗占82.5%,经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)占11.2%,手术主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)占6.3%。与TAVR治疗(4期vs 0期:死亡率OR为27.70 95% CI 17.35-35.17, LoS为7.34 95% CI 6.34-8.35,成本为70,710 95% CI 65,110-76,310)和保守治疗(4期vs 0期:死亡率OR为9.15 95% CI 5.52-15.15, LoS为6.27 95% CI 5.63-6.90,成本为28,384,25,084至31,684)和保守治疗(4期vs 0期:死亡率OR 3.55 95% CI 3.13-4.04, LoS 2.09 95% CI 1.87 - 2.31,成本6362 (95% CI 5642-7083)。结论:AS患者的心脏损伤可以使用诊断代码进行评估,它与住院死亡率、LoS和成本相关,并且与TAVR治疗相比,SAVR治疗对这些结果的影响更大。
期刊介绍:
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.