{"title":"Comparison of colon adenoma detection rate using transparent cap-assisted and conventional colonoscopy: result from an international trial in Asia.","authors":"Sakkarin Chirapongsathorn, Sho Suzuki, Panlert Prasanwon, Satimai Aniwan, Han-Mo Chiu, Kannikar Laohavichitra, Takeshi Yamamura, Chen-Ya Kuo, Naohisa Yoshida, Tiing Leong Ang, Takahito Takezawa, Rungsun Rerknimitr, Hideki Ishikawa, Takuji Gotoda","doi":"10.1159/000543296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Controversy remains regarding transparent cap-assisted technique improves adenoma detection rate (ADR) in colonoscopy. We aimed to investigate the effect of transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy on ADR and other colonoscopy performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed sub-analysis of an international, multicenter, open-label database containing colonoscopy data from 11 centers in 4 Asian countries/regions on patients who underwent colonoscopy. The patient characteristics, procedure related characteristics, and pathological findings of all detected lesions were prospectively recorded. The patients were divided into 2 groups as receiving colonoscopy with or without transparent cap attachment. The ADR and procedure time were compared between the 2 groups. Other procedural factors related to ADR were also investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between November 2020 and January 2022, 3,029 who underwent colonoscopy (transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy, n=1,796; standard colonoscopy, n=1,233) were enrolled in this study. The transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy group ADR was significantly higher than the conventional colonoscopy (55.1% vs 50.0%, p<0.01). Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy detected a higher proportion of patients with adenoma (odd ratio (OR): 1.59, 95%CI: 1.13-2.24, p<0.01) and any polypoid lesion (OR: 1.49, 95%CI: 1.04-2.16, p=0.03). Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy also reduced cecal intubation time (mean difference: -0.35 min) and total colonoscopy time (mean difference -3.4 min). In the other procedural factors, using linked color imaging (OR: 1.75, 95%CI: 1.49-2.06, p<0.01), patient body rotation (OR: 1.54, 95%CI, 1.12-2.13, p<0.01), longer withdrawal time (OR:1.12, 95%CI: 1.09-1.15, p<0.01) were also significantly associated to adenoma detection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In real-world practice, transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy is a safe and inexpensive technology that could improve adenoma and polyp detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":11294,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543296","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Controversy remains regarding transparent cap-assisted technique improves adenoma detection rate (ADR) in colonoscopy. We aimed to investigate the effect of transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy on ADR and other colonoscopy performance.
Methods: We performed sub-analysis of an international, multicenter, open-label database containing colonoscopy data from 11 centers in 4 Asian countries/regions on patients who underwent colonoscopy. The patient characteristics, procedure related characteristics, and pathological findings of all detected lesions were prospectively recorded. The patients were divided into 2 groups as receiving colonoscopy with or without transparent cap attachment. The ADR and procedure time were compared between the 2 groups. Other procedural factors related to ADR were also investigated.
Results: Between November 2020 and January 2022, 3,029 who underwent colonoscopy (transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy, n=1,796; standard colonoscopy, n=1,233) were enrolled in this study. The transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy group ADR was significantly higher than the conventional colonoscopy (55.1% vs 50.0%, p<0.01). Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy detected a higher proportion of patients with adenoma (odd ratio (OR): 1.59, 95%CI: 1.13-2.24, p<0.01) and any polypoid lesion (OR: 1.49, 95%CI: 1.04-2.16, p=0.03). Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy also reduced cecal intubation time (mean difference: -0.35 min) and total colonoscopy time (mean difference -3.4 min). In the other procedural factors, using linked color imaging (OR: 1.75, 95%CI: 1.49-2.06, p<0.01), patient body rotation (OR: 1.54, 95%CI, 1.12-2.13, p<0.01), longer withdrawal time (OR:1.12, 95%CI: 1.09-1.15, p<0.01) were also significantly associated to adenoma detection.
Conclusion: In real-world practice, transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy is a safe and inexpensive technology that could improve adenoma and polyp detection.
期刊介绍:
Each issue of this journal is dedicated to a special topic of current interest, covering both clinical and basic science topics in gastrointestinal function and disorders. The contents of each issue are comprehensive and reflect the state of the art, featuring editorials, reviews, mini reviews and original papers. These individual contributions encompass a variety of disciplines including all fields of gastroenterology. ''Digestive Diseases'' bridges the communication gap between advances made in the academic setting and their application in patient care. The journal is a valuable service for clinicians, specialists and physicians-in-training.