An accelerated deep learning model can accurately identify clinically important humeral and scapular landmarks on plain radiographs obtained before and after anatomic arthroplasty.
William L Crutcher, Ishan Dane, Anastasia J Whitson, Frederick A Matsen Iii, Jason E Hsu
{"title":"An accelerated deep learning model can accurately identify clinically important humeral and scapular landmarks on plain radiographs obtained before and after anatomic arthroplasty.","authors":"William L Crutcher, Ishan Dane, Anastasia J Whitson, Frederick A Matsen Iii, Jason E Hsu","doi":"10.1007/s00264-024-06401-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Accurate identification of radiographic landmarks is fundamental to characterizing glenohumeral relationships before and sequentially after shoulder arthroplasty, but manual annotation of these radiographs is laborious. We report on the use of artificial intelligence, specifically computer vision and deep learning models (DLMs), in determining the accuracy of DLM-identified and surgeon identified (SI) landmarks before and after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>240 true anteroposterior radiographs were annotated using 11 standard osseous landmarks to train a deep learning model. Radiographs were modified to allow for a training model consisting of 2,260 images. The accuracy of DLM landmarks was compared to manually annotated radiographs using 60 radiographs not used in the training model. In addition, we also performed 14 different measurements of component positioning and compared these to measurements made based on DLM landmarks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean deviation between DLM vs. SI cortical landmarks was 1.9 ± 1.9 mm. Scapular landmarks had slightly lower deviations compared to humeral landmarks (1.5 ± 1.8 mm vs. 2.1 ± 2.0 mm, p < 0.001). The DLM was also found to be accurate with respect to 14 measures of scapular, humeral, and glenohumeral measurements with a mean deviation of 2.9 ± 2.7 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An accelerated deep learning model using a base of only 240 annotated images was able to achieve low levels of deviation in identifying common humeral and scapular landmarks on preoperative and postoperative radiographs. The reliability and efficiency of this deep learning model represents a powerful tool to analyze preoperative and postoperative radiographs while avoiding human observer bias.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06401-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Accurate identification of radiographic landmarks is fundamental to characterizing glenohumeral relationships before and sequentially after shoulder arthroplasty, but manual annotation of these radiographs is laborious. We report on the use of artificial intelligence, specifically computer vision and deep learning models (DLMs), in determining the accuracy of DLM-identified and surgeon identified (SI) landmarks before and after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.
Materials & methods: 240 true anteroposterior radiographs were annotated using 11 standard osseous landmarks to train a deep learning model. Radiographs were modified to allow for a training model consisting of 2,260 images. The accuracy of DLM landmarks was compared to manually annotated radiographs using 60 radiographs not used in the training model. In addition, we also performed 14 different measurements of component positioning and compared these to measurements made based on DLM landmarks.
Results: The mean deviation between DLM vs. SI cortical landmarks was 1.9 ± 1.9 mm. Scapular landmarks had slightly lower deviations compared to humeral landmarks (1.5 ± 1.8 mm vs. 2.1 ± 2.0 mm, p < 0.001). The DLM was also found to be accurate with respect to 14 measures of scapular, humeral, and glenohumeral measurements with a mean deviation of 2.9 ± 2.7 mm.
Conclusions: An accelerated deep learning model using a base of only 240 annotated images was able to achieve low levels of deviation in identifying common humeral and scapular landmarks on preoperative and postoperative radiographs. The reliability and efficiency of this deep learning model represents a powerful tool to analyze preoperative and postoperative radiographs while avoiding human observer bias.
期刊介绍:
International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters.
Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable.
The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.