Classification of ROI-based fMRI data in short-term memory tasks using discriminant analysis and neural networks.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY Frontiers in Neuroinformatics Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fninf.2024.1480366
Magdalena Fafrowicz, Marcin Tutajewski, Igor Sieradzki, Jeremi K Ochab, Anna Ceglarek-Sroka, Koryna Lewandowska, Tadeusz Marek, Barbara Sikora-Wachowicz, Igor T Podolak, Paweł Oświęcimka
{"title":"Classification of ROI-based fMRI data in short-term memory tasks using discriminant analysis and neural networks.","authors":"Magdalena Fafrowicz, Marcin Tutajewski, Igor Sieradzki, Jeremi K Ochab, Anna Ceglarek-Sroka, Koryna Lewandowska, Tadeusz Marek, Barbara Sikora-Wachowicz, Igor T Podolak, Paweł Oświęcimka","doi":"10.3389/fninf.2024.1480366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding brain function relies on identifying spatiotemporal patterns in brain activity. In recent years, machine learning methods have been widely used to detect connections between regions of interest (ROIs) involved in cognitive functions, as measured by the fMRI technique. However, it's essential to match the type of learning method to the problem type, and extracting the information about the most important ROI connections might be challenging. In this contribution, we used machine learning techniques to classify tasks in a working memory experiment and identify the brain areas involved in processing information. We employed classical discriminators and neural networks (convolutional and residual) to differentiate between brain responses to distinct types of visual stimuli (visuospatial and verbal) and different phases of the experiment (information encoding and retrieval). The best performance was achieved by the LGBM classifier with 1-time point input data during memory retrieval and a convolutional neural network during the encoding phase. Additionally, we developed an algorithm that took into account feature correlations to estimate the most important brain regions for the model's accuracy. Our findings suggest that from the perspective of considered models, brain signals related to the resting state have a similar degree of complexity to those related to the encoding phase, which does not improve the model's accuracy. However, during the retrieval phase, the signals were easily distinguished from the resting state, indicating their different structure. The study identified brain regions that are crucial for processing information in working memory, as well as the differences in the dynamics of encoding and retrieval processes. Furthermore, our findings indicate spatiotemporal distinctions related to these processes. The analysis confirmed the importance of the basal ganglia in processing information during the retrieval phase. The presented results reveal the benefits of applying machine learning algorithms to investigate working memory dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":12462,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neuroinformatics","volume":"18 ","pages":"1480366"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695337/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neuroinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2024.1480366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding brain function relies on identifying spatiotemporal patterns in brain activity. In recent years, machine learning methods have been widely used to detect connections between regions of interest (ROIs) involved in cognitive functions, as measured by the fMRI technique. However, it's essential to match the type of learning method to the problem type, and extracting the information about the most important ROI connections might be challenging. In this contribution, we used machine learning techniques to classify tasks in a working memory experiment and identify the brain areas involved in processing information. We employed classical discriminators and neural networks (convolutional and residual) to differentiate between brain responses to distinct types of visual stimuli (visuospatial and verbal) and different phases of the experiment (information encoding and retrieval). The best performance was achieved by the LGBM classifier with 1-time point input data during memory retrieval and a convolutional neural network during the encoding phase. Additionally, we developed an algorithm that took into account feature correlations to estimate the most important brain regions for the model's accuracy. Our findings suggest that from the perspective of considered models, brain signals related to the resting state have a similar degree of complexity to those related to the encoding phase, which does not improve the model's accuracy. However, during the retrieval phase, the signals were easily distinguished from the resting state, indicating their different structure. The study identified brain regions that are crucial for processing information in working memory, as well as the differences in the dynamics of encoding and retrieval processes. Furthermore, our findings indicate spatiotemporal distinctions related to these processes. The analysis confirmed the importance of the basal ganglia in processing information during the retrieval phase. The presented results reveal the benefits of applying machine learning algorithms to investigate working memory dynamics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用判别分析和神经网络对短期记忆任务中基于roi的fMRI数据分类。
理解大脑功能依赖于识别大脑活动的时空模式。近年来,机器学习方法已被广泛用于检测涉及认知功能的感兴趣区域(roi)之间的连接,如fMRI技术所测量的。然而,将学习方法的类型与问题类型相匹配是至关重要的,并且提取有关最重要的ROI连接的信息可能具有挑战性。在这篇文章中,我们使用机器学习技术对工作记忆实验中的任务进行分类,并确定参与处理信息的大脑区域。我们使用经典判别器和神经网络(卷积和残差)来区分大脑对不同类型的视觉刺激(视觉空间和语言)和不同阶段的实验(信息编码和检索)的反应。在记忆检索阶段使用1时间点输入数据的LGBM分类器和在编码阶段使用卷积神经网络获得了最好的性能。此外,我们开发了一种算法,该算法考虑了特征相关性,以估计模型准确性中最重要的大脑区域。我们的研究结果表明,从考虑模型的角度来看,与静息状态相关的大脑信号与编码阶段相关的大脑信号具有相似的复杂程度,这并没有提高模型的准确性。然而,在检索阶段,信号很容易与静息状态区分开来,表明它们的结构不同。该研究确定了在工作记忆中处理信息的关键大脑区域,以及编码和检索过程的动态差异。此外,我们的研究结果表明,时空差异与这些过程有关。分析证实了基底神经节在检索阶段处理信息的重要性。提出的结果揭示了应用机器学习算法来研究工作记忆动态的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
132
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Neuroinformatics publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research on the development and implementation of numerical/computational models and analytical tools used to share, integrate and analyze experimental data and advance theories of the nervous system functions. Specialty Chief Editors Jan G. Bjaalie at the University of Oslo and Sean L. Hill at the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics and the public worldwide. Neuroscience is being propelled into the information age as the volume of information explodes, demanding organization and synthesis. Novel synthesis approaches are opening up a new dimension for the exploration of the components of brain elements and systems and the vast number of variables that underlie their functions. Neural data is highly heterogeneous with complex inter-relations across multiple levels, driving the need for innovative organizing and synthesizing approaches from genes to cognition, and covering a range of species and disease states. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics therefore welcomes submissions on existing neuroscience databases, development of data and knowledge bases for all levels of neuroscience, applications and technologies that can facilitate data sharing (interoperability, formats, terminologies, and ontologies), and novel tools for data acquisition, analyses, visualization, and dissemination of nervous system data. Our journal welcomes submissions on new tools (software and hardware) that support brain modeling, and the merging of neuroscience databases with brain models used for simulation and visualization.
期刊最新文献
Power spectral analysis of voltage-gated channels in neurons. Editorial: Protecting privacy in neuroimaging analysis: balancing data sharing and privacy preservation. The Multicentre Acute ischemic stroke imaGIng and Clinical data (MAGIC) repository: rationale and blueprint. Deep CNN ResNet-18 based model with attention and transfer learning for Alzheimer's disease detection. Leveraging deep learning for robust EEG analysis in mental health monitoring.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1