Application value of central venous-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference in postoperative cognitive dysfunction in patients with acute aortic dissection.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1186/s13019-024-03300-x
Lei Wang, Zhen Hong Wang, Duan Qi Zhu, Xin Yi Xie, Xin Chen, Xiao Liang Wang
{"title":"Application value of central venous-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference in postoperative cognitive dysfunction in patients with acute aortic dissection.","authors":"Lei Wang, Zhen Hong Wang, Duan Qi Zhu, Xin Yi Xie, Xin Chen, Xiao Liang Wang","doi":"10.1186/s13019-024-03300-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the clinical application value of the central venous-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference (Pv-aCO2) in postoperative cognitive dysfunction(POCD) in patients with acute aortic dissection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on the general data of 236 patients. Blood gas samples were collected from the arterial and venous lines at various time points during the surgery, including before and after the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), immediately after CPB initiation, before and after deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, 30 min after rewarming, and 5 min before weaning from CPB. The partial PV-aCO2 was calculated. Based on the average PV-aCO2 value, patients were divided into an observation group (PV-aCO2 > 6 mmHg, n = 112) and a control group (PV-aCO2 < 6 mmHg, n = 124). The perioperative data and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores were compared between the two groups to assess the incidence and severity of POCD. Additionally, the expression levels of peripheral serum S100β in the two groups were compared 6 h postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of POCD was higher in the observation group compared to the control group, while MMSE scores and serum S100β levels were lower in the observation group. Additionally, the observation group patients with POCD had lower MMSE scores and serum S100β levels compared to the control group patients. In addition, logistic regression analysis revealed that advanced age, serum S100β levels, female gender, CPB time, unilateral brain perfusion time, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and smoking history were all independent risk factors for postoperative POCD (all P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pv-aCO2 can effectively reflect the intraoperative cerebral metabolic level in patients with acute aortic dissection and can serve as an intraoperative warning indicator for cognitive dysfunction. Its clinical recommendation for use is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":15201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-024-03300-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate the clinical application value of the central venous-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference (Pv-aCO2) in postoperative cognitive dysfunction(POCD) in patients with acute aortic dissection.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the general data of 236 patients. Blood gas samples were collected from the arterial and venous lines at various time points during the surgery, including before and after the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), immediately after CPB initiation, before and after deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, 30 min after rewarming, and 5 min before weaning from CPB. The partial PV-aCO2 was calculated. Based on the average PV-aCO2 value, patients were divided into an observation group (PV-aCO2 > 6 mmHg, n = 112) and a control group (PV-aCO2 < 6 mmHg, n = 124). The perioperative data and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores were compared between the two groups to assess the incidence and severity of POCD. Additionally, the expression levels of peripheral serum S100β in the two groups were compared 6 h postoperatively.

Results: The incidence of POCD was higher in the observation group compared to the control group, while MMSE scores and serum S100β levels were lower in the observation group. Additionally, the observation group patients with POCD had lower MMSE scores and serum S100β levels compared to the control group patients. In addition, logistic regression analysis revealed that advanced age, serum S100β levels, female gender, CPB time, unilateral brain perfusion time, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and smoking history were all independent risk factors for postoperative POCD (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Pv-aCO2 can effectively reflect the intraoperative cerebral metabolic level in patients with acute aortic dissection and can serve as an intraoperative warning indicator for cognitive dysfunction. Its clinical recommendation for use is warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中心静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差在急性主动脉夹层术后认知功能障碍中的应用价值。
目的:探讨中心静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差(Pv-aCO2)在急性主动脉夹层患者术后认知功能障碍(POCD)中的临床应用价值。方法:对236例患者的一般资料进行回顾性分析。在手术过程中不同时间点,包括体外循环启动前后、启动后、深度低温停循环前后、复温后30分钟、体外循环脱机前5分钟,采集动脉和静脉的血气样本。计算PV-aCO2的偏值。根据PV-aCO2平均值将患者分为观察组(PV-aCO2 > 6 mmHg, n = 112)和对照组(PV-aCO2)。结果:观察组POCD发生率高于对照组,MMSE评分和血清S100β水平低于对照组。此外,观察组POCD患者的MMSE评分和血清S100β水平低于对照组患者。此外,logistic回归分析显示,高龄、血清S100β水平、女性、CPB时间、单侧脑灌注时间、高脂血症、糖尿病、吸烟史均为术后POCD的独立危险因素(均P)。结论:Pv-aCO2能有效反映急性主动脉夹层患者术中脑代谢水平,可作为术中认知功能障碍的预警指标。临床推荐使用是有根据的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
286
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of research in the field of Cardiology, and Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. The journal publishes original scientific research documenting clinical and experimental advances in cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgery, and related fields. Topics of interest include surgical techniques, survival rates, surgical complications and their outcomes; along with basic sciences, pediatric conditions, transplantations and clinical trials. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery is of interest to cardiothoracic and vascular surgeons, cardiothoracic anaesthesiologists, cardiologists, chest physicians, and allied health professionals.
期刊最新文献
Global trends and collaborative networks in minimally invasive treatments for great saphenous varicose veins: a bibliometric analysis. Aortic dissection in a Jehovah's witness: Frozen Elephant Trunk and subsequent 4D flow MRI analysis, a case report. Second surgical treatment of recurrent thoracic outlet syndrome. Surgical outcomes of EA-MIDCAB vs. full sternotomy CABG in multi-vessel coronary artery disease: a retrospective cohort study. Circulatory arrest time above 30 min have significantly detrimental effects on the outcomes of type a aortic dissection repair.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1