The structure of meaning in schizophrenia: A study of spontaneous speech in Chinese

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatry Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116347
Han Zhang , Rui He , Claudio Palominos , Ning Hsu , Hintat Cheung , Wolfram Hinzen
{"title":"The structure of meaning in schizophrenia: A study of spontaneous speech in Chinese","authors":"Han Zhang ,&nbsp;Rui He ,&nbsp;Claudio Palominos ,&nbsp;Ning Hsu ,&nbsp;Hintat Cheung ,&nbsp;Wolfram Hinzen","doi":"10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Narrative speech production requires the retrieval of concepts to refer to entities, which need to be referenceable more than once for any form of narrative coherence to arise. Such coherence has long been observed to be affected in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD), yet the underlying mechanisms have been a longstanding puzzle, with existing evidence predominantly derived from Indo-European languages. Here we analyzed two picture descriptions from 22 native Mandarin Chinese speakers with SSD and 15 healthy controls. An analysis scheme was created targeting key mechanisms in the genesis of referential meaning in speech. Results revealed that individuals with SSD used more definite-anaphoric noun phrases (NPs), which refer back to a previously mentioned entity in a narrative, and fewer NPs with adjectival modifiers. Definite NPs appeared earlier in their speech, and both definite and indefinite NPs occurred at shorter temporal distances. Participants with SSD referenced fewer entities, which in turn were more recurrent (referenced more than once). Furthermore, speech graphs capturing how entities are referenced across a narrative exhibited higher clustering, centrality, density, and shorter characteristic path lengths in SSD. Overall, these results from a non-Indo-European language support the new concept of a ‘shrinking’ or more condensed semantic space in SSD, impeding normal mental navigation across the concepts we retrieve during speech.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20819,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Research","volume":"344 ","pages":"Article 116347"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165178124006322","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Narrative speech production requires the retrieval of concepts to refer to entities, which need to be referenceable more than once for any form of narrative coherence to arise. Such coherence has long been observed to be affected in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD), yet the underlying mechanisms have been a longstanding puzzle, with existing evidence predominantly derived from Indo-European languages. Here we analyzed two picture descriptions from 22 native Mandarin Chinese speakers with SSD and 15 healthy controls. An analysis scheme was created targeting key mechanisms in the genesis of referential meaning in speech. Results revealed that individuals with SSD used more definite-anaphoric noun phrases (NPs), which refer back to a previously mentioned entity in a narrative, and fewer NPs with adjectival modifiers. Definite NPs appeared earlier in their speech, and both definite and indefinite NPs occurred at shorter temporal distances. Participants with SSD referenced fewer entities, which in turn were more recurrent (referenced more than once). Furthermore, speech graphs capturing how entities are referenced across a narrative exhibited higher clustering, centrality, density, and shorter characteristic path lengths in SSD. Overall, these results from a non-Indo-European language support the new concept of a ‘shrinking’ or more condensed semantic space in SSD, impeding normal mental navigation across the concepts we retrieve during speech.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神分裂症的意义结构:汉语自发言语的研究。
叙事性言语的产生需要对指代实体的概念进行检索,这些实体需要被多次引用才能产生任何形式的叙事连贯性。长期以来,人们一直观察到这种一致性在精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD)中受到影响,但其潜在机制一直是一个长期存在的谜团,现有证据主要来自印欧语言。在这里,我们分析了22名母语为普通话的SSD患者和15名健康对照者的两幅图片描述。针对言语中指称意义产生的关键机制,建立了一个分析方案。结果显示,患有SSD的个体使用更多的明确回指名词短语(NPs),这些短语指的是叙述中先前提到的实体,而使用形容词修饰语的NPs较少。确定NPs出现时间较早,确定NPs和不确定NPs出现的时间距离均较短。具有SSD的参与者引用较少的实体,而这些实体又更频繁(引用不止一次)。此外,捕捉实体如何在叙述中被引用的语音图在SSD中表现出更高的聚类、中心性、密度和更短的特征路径长度。总的来说,这些来自非印欧语言的结果支持了SSD中“缩小”或更浓缩的语义空间的新概念,阻碍了我们在讲话中检索概念的正常心理导航。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatry Research
Psychiatry Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
527
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Psychiatry Research offers swift publication of comprehensive research reports and reviews within the field of psychiatry. The scope of the journal encompasses: Biochemical, physiological, neuroanatomic, genetic, neurocognitive, and psychosocial determinants of psychiatric disorders. Diagnostic assessments of psychiatric disorders. Evaluations that pursue hypotheses about the cause or causes of psychiatric diseases. Evaluations of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic psychiatric treatments. Basic neuroscience studies related to animal or neurochemical models for psychiatric disorders. Methodological advances, such as instrumentation, clinical scales, and assays directly applicable to psychiatric research.
期刊最新文献
Exploring cognitive symptoms in patients with unipolar and bipolar major depression: A comparative evaluation of subjective and objective performance Editorial Board Absence of nonfatal suicidal behavior preceding suicide death reveals differences in clinical risks A systematic review of the etiology and neurobiology of intermittent explosive disorder Mental health clinicians’ practices and perspectives of eating disorder apps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1